If I recall correctly, we were at 18% coming out of the Carter administration.
Friend of mine moved to rural Mississippi. Paid $400k for a big house on a couple of acres.AgFan1974 said:Been looking too. Curious... what areas were you looking at?Tree Hugger said:
yeah we are at 2.5% and 4 years into a 15 year note, I don't see us going anywhere for a while. We have enough equity in the house to pay cash in a less expensive area but my current job wouldn't support a move to one of those areas.
2.75 but should be done with it in 10 years now. Can't wait for that feeling.Tailgate88 said:Damn! We are sitting at 2.5 and thought WE had gotten a great rate!Hoyt Ag said:
1.99%
I'm stuck with this house forever.
Hoyt Ag said:
1.99%
I'm stuck with this house forever.
When the FED does QE like 2008, they purchase assets like treasuries. Those assets go on the FED balance sheet. The money used to purchase them was taken from the banks with full approval of the banks and government. But the FED itself is a bank. They have to hold 10% of everything they loan out as reserve. Well, those new assets can be considered 10% of money that will now be loaned out. So they can loan out 10x the value of the assets they bought.halfastros81 said:
Retired Engineer here . Not well versed in finance , money supply , etc. I invested consistently well and diversified but do not understand all the inner workings
Can I ask you to walk us thru what the deflationary period and unwinding those derivatives looks like in financial laymen's terms .
Yeah. That's pretty close to when I was finishing up school, then in law school. Adjustable rate mortgages were a thing plus there were still assumable loans in existence, if lucky enough to find them.Funky Winkerbean said:
If I recall correctly, we were at 18% coming out of the Carter administration.
Mathguy64 said:Mine has been paid off for a long time. Moving upwards just means higher property taxes, higher insurance and a mortgage north of 7%.Hoyt Ag said:
1.99%
I'm stuck with this house forever.
Yeah, thats a no for me Dawg.
3.5% here, with less than 80k left on the house, I'm not moving.Hoyt Ag said:
1.99%
I'm stuck with this house forever.
infinity ag said:
Paid off my house in 2018 after owning it for 8 years.
No more mortgage, no more debt, no more fretting about interest rates.
I love my house and area but this stinks for jobs. I plan to move to the West in a year and will rent out my house.
Freedom.
Yukon Cornelius said:
The federal reserve isn't a government. It's our overlord.
Yukon Cornelius said:infinity ag said:
Paid off my house in 2018 after owning it for 8 years.
No more mortgage, no more debt, no more fretting about interest rates.
I love my house and area but this stinks for jobs. I plan to move to the West in a year and will rent out my house.
Freedom.
Curious question: why not sell your home and put the money in an ETF that does rental properties?
kb2001 said:
Deflation can spiral and quickly, all non-liquid assets devalue, and the real cost of debt increases. If you have debt, this can be crushing. Most companies carry debt, this is where the real pain comes in. Once jobs start getting cut, and salaries start dropping, anybody with a mortgage or a car payment could quickly find themselves in over their head. We've seen expectations for car loans get insane the last decade, even going out to 8 year loans, which is crazy.
The risks of deflation are substantial, and our economic system is very scared of this happening. This is why it's designed to maintain 1-2% rate of inflation, that is the target. For better or worse, this is the system we live in.
Yukon Cornelius said:
You're right. Large part of it is driven by regulations, impact fees and property taxes.
Tree Hugger said:
yeah we are at 2.5% and 4 years into a 15 year note, I don't see us going anywhere for a while. We have enough equity in the house to pay cash in a less expensive area but my current job wouldn't support a move to one of those areas.
There have been times when I have fantacized about going back renting, not gonna lie. Typically when 2 or 3 things go wrong with the house back to back...or when stressing about a flood or hurricane or busted pipes from freeze in Houston. I miss not having to worry about that stuff, but I have very simple tastes, which most females don't share. I just need a sturdy place, preferably with a covered back patio.tysker said:Work flexibility will keep a particular segment of the workforce in the rental market, imo.Hoyt Ag said:My company is begging me to relocate but it doesn't make a lot of financial sense for me. I will stay a few more years and make a decision then and most likely keep this as a rental. With a note of $1200 and the home able to rent for $3500, its a no brainer.Mathguy64 said:Mine has been paid off for a long time. Moving upwards just means higher property taxes, higher insurance and a mortgage north of 7%.Hoyt Ag said:
1.99%
I'm stuck with this house forever.
Yeah, thats a no for me Dawg.
Homeownership isn't all it's cracked up to be, and public school zones, aren't going to be as important as they once were. The younger generations don't have as much 'stuff,' and even furniture is becoming more disposable.
DallasAg 94 said:
I look at our Insurance renewal... we're sub 3 on Interest rate... there is no chance people are going to buy houses.
Our escrow is now 144% of our P&I.
Part of it is the value of the house has more than doubled since we bought it... so the Taxes have grown rapidly. And then, if you want to be Insured for the full value... well, you'll Insured for twice what you paid.
The Squeeze is on.
I don’t know who did this but it’s awesome. pic.twitter.com/NXLhj0Vr0r
— Peter Mallouk (@PeterMallouk) January 16, 2025
Yukon Cornelius said:
I thought you said you were moving and keeping paid off house as rental. Maybe I misunderstood.
DallasAg 94 said:Technically, doesn't the Insurance just need to cover the loan?!ABATTBQ11 said:DallasAg 94 said:
I look at our Insurance renewal... we're sub 3 on Interest rate... there is no chance people are going to buy houses.
Our escrow is now 144% of our P&I.
Part of it is the value of the house has more than doubled since we bought it... so the Taxes have grown rapidly. And then, if you want to be Insured for the full value... well, you'll Insured for twice what you paid.
The Squeeze is on.
The house doesn't need to be insured to the property value, just the cost to rebuild. My in-laws place has absolutely skyrocketed in value strictly because of the land value, so the rate of insurance increase for them has not been nearly the same as the total property valuation.