Eye-patch McCain getting primaried?

10,266 Views | 90 Replies | Last: 18 days ago by 94chem
nomad2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If there are 6 people running in this primary, she can come in 6th again and make it a tradition.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:


Is Crenwshaw really as destructive as McCain who delivered what, a third of the medical (or just the) economy into the sociailist govt grip for good? Fulfilled a Dem dream of decades.

He apparently is a neocon type, but is he that bad?


In a world of MAGA totality and purity, yes.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He angry and stemming cause he got his hand caught in candy jar... and it's probably a vid.

Wink wink, say no more.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
torrid said:

titan said:


Is Crenwshaw really as destructive as McCain who delivered what, a third of the medical (or just the) economy into the sociailist govt grip for good? Fulfilled a Dem dream of decades.

He apparently is a neocon type, but is he that bad?


In a world of MAGA totality and purity, yes.
For what though. Voting for Trump doesn't mean anti-Crenshaw. Not without him doing really bad stuff like McCain's pro Obamacare vote?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She has no chance. Wood though.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eye-patch McCain is one of the better ones I have ever heard. Brutal.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:


Is Crenwshaw really as destructive as McCain who delivered what, a third of the medical (or just the) economy into the sociailist govt grip for good? Fulfilled a Dem dream of decades.

He apparently is a neocon type, but is he that bad?


Only thing I know is that he supports helping Ukraine and Tucker Carlson hates him.

He comes out really dewshy and morally superior which is annoying.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought it was "Patches McCain".
Clavell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Personally think he has one of the best podcasts. Lot of great guests and learn a lot about complicated issues.
Bondag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Clavell said:

Personally think he has one of the best podcasts. Lot of great guests and learn a lot about complicated issues.


I listened to him for a while, but it got too left leaning.
Buck Turgidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I lived in that district until 3 years ago. She will not beat Crenshaw.
Gilligan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nanomachines son said:

Farmer_J said:

Shes a loon so it's a long shot, but that's probably the only type of candidate crazy enough to run against him.





No, she's a terrible candidate.


But her shirt says "don't be weak or gay"
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL.

zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can't just 'show up' and expect to be elected in Texas.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eff Dan Crenshaw and I will never forgive him for what he did to Eddie Gallagher. That is a line he can never uncross and it's simple as that.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Capstone said:

My district - hopefully, there is a better candidate when the time rolls around. Tired of D.C., but she wouldn't be any better. What happened to actual quality choices.


Mine too. May be worth getting rid of DC for at least one term so we might be spared dealing with him in public life going forward. It's easy enough to get rid of a one term person. In our district the primary is more difficult than the general.
FJB
Hank the Grifter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I got a kick out of watching her videos during the MO election but at the end of the day, she's a meathead and doesn't stand a chance of winning anything anywhere. Maybe dog catcher.
SociallyConditionedAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stupe said:

aggiepanic95 said:

Not my district, but I hope she wins.
I don't. She's a clown.

Why not? We know Crenshaw is bad, so anyone else can hardly be worse. Even if she is, to primary her next time. There's just no good reason to vote for a self serving RINO.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MarkTwain said:

Eff Dan Crenshaw and I will never forgive him for what he did to Eddie Gallagher. That is a line he can never uncross and it's simple as that.
"This is my community, back out and let me handle it."

Fking scumbag makes my blood boil.
Wildmen06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is my district, i think I'll run myself. I would enjoy coming onto Texags to see how everyone think's i am doing
BarnacleBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He might get primaried but it won't be by the likes of her.
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BenFiasco14 said:

She has no chance. . . . .


To unseat an incumbent crowded primary , to keep him under 50% then push hard on the run off because turnout is so low
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MarkTwain said:

Eff Dan Crenshaw and I will never forgive him for what he did to Eddie Gallagher. That is a line he can never uncross and it's simple as that.

What exactly did he do? Everything I've seen is that Crenshaw supported Gallagher and sought to have Trump intervene on his behalf and it's been recently that Gallagher said Crenshaw didn't do enough for him which pissed off Crenshaw.

Is there more than that?
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MarkTwain said:



How about some actual context here- this isn't giving the government power to shut down news sites which disagree with the government. This is about the TikTok ban.

The same TikTok which is controlled by the ChiComs and has a demonstrated history of passing off user data to the Chinese government/military. And has been proven to be using algorithms which promote Chinese propaganda.

You're good with a ChiCom controlled entity operating essentially as an espionage network, is that your take?
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TarponChaser said:

MarkTwain said:



How about some actual context here- this isn't giving the government power to shut down news sites which disagree with the government. This is about the TikTok ban.

The same TikTok which is controlled by the ChiComs and has a demonstrated history of passing off user data to the Chinese government/military. And has been proven to be using algorithms which promote Chinese propaganda.

You're good with a ChiCom controlled entity operating essentially as an espionage network, is that your take?



Obviously you didn't watch the video


Crenshaw denying that the alphabet agencies were not manipulating media and social media is laughable, given the absolute history of operation mockingbird and the release of the Twitter Files and that traitorous POS defending them is all the context you need.


And as I have stated in a prior post on this thread, what he attempted to do to Eddie Gallagher is unforgivable, end of story
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MarkTwain said:

TarponChaser said:

MarkTwain said:



How about some actual context here- this isn't giving the government power to shut down news sites which disagree with the government. This is about the TikTok ban.

The same TikTok which is controlled by the ChiComs and has a demonstrated history of passing off user data to the Chinese government/military. And has been proven to be using algorithms which promote Chinese propaganda.

You're good with a ChiCom controlled entity operating essentially as an espionage network, is that your take?



Obviously you didn't watch the video


Crenshaw denying that the alphabet agencies were not manipulating media and social media is laughable, given the absolute history of operation mockingbird and the release of the Twitter Files and that traitorous POS defending them is all the context you need.


And as I have stated in a prior post on this thread, what he attempted to do to Eddie Gallagher is unforgivable, end of story

I did watch it.

And I also asked what he did to Gallagher. Specifically. Because everything I can find is that before and during the trial Crenshaw sought to help Gallagher. It's only been recently that Gallagher has made some accusations of which I can find no corroboration.
Gaw617
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing will change until we have term limits. Serving in congress was meant to be a sacrifice for a short time to help the American people then you would go home and get back to your career. Politics should not be a career. It should not be a way to make money.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TarponChaser said:

MarkTwain said:

TarponChaser said:

MarkTwain said:



How about some actual context here- this isn't giving the government power to shut down news sites which disagree with the government. This is about the TikTok ban.

The same TikTok which is controlled by the ChiComs and has a demonstrated history of passing off user data to the Chinese government/military. And has been proven to be using algorithms which promote Chinese propaganda.

You're good with a ChiCom controlled entity operating essentially as an espionage network, is that your take?



Obviously you didn't watch the video


Crenshaw denying that the alphabet agencies were not manipulating media and social media is laughable, given the absolute history of operation mockingbird and the release of the Twitter Files and that traitorous POS defending them is all the context you need.


And as I have stated in a prior post on this thread, what he attempted to do to Eddie Gallagher is unforgivable, end of story

I did watch it.

And I also asked what he did to Gallagher. Specifically. Because everything I can find is that before and during the trial Crenshaw sought to help Gallagher. It's only been recently that Gallagher has made some accusations of which I can find no corroboration.



Well there's plenty of corroboration out there and I'm certainly not going to waste my breath with anyone defending this POS


Merry Christmas
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
AgCat93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Farmer_J said:

Sid Farkas said:

Need a better rule #1 before I can weigh in...




Wood

Wrapping paper is nice but inside the box?

Meh.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BASED

Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgCat93 said:

Ag with kids said:

Farmer_J said:

Sid Farkas said:

Need a better rule #1 before I can weigh in...




Wood

Wrapping paper is nice but inside the box?

Meh.
Yeah...

I'd like to get inside that box.

But, what box are YOU talking about?
Old Sarge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

titan said:


Is Crenwshaw really as destructive as McCain who delivered what, a third of the medical (or just the) economy into the sociailist govt grip for good? Fulfilled a Dem dream of decades.

He apparently is a neocon type, but is he that bad?


In a world of MAGA totality and purity, yes.
Music to my ears.

Primary his ass with an electable candidate. Eypatch McCain has to go.
"Green" is the new RED.
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I just want to see more of her antics. She seems like she may have a screw loose but those types are a ton of fun. Give me another campaign with her.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.