Her fat ass is going to get slapped again.

And the libs just can't understand the problem

45-70Ag said:

---

Her fat ass is going to get slapped again.

---

Using tax payers dollars for the appeal, too. Such a waste of resources.

Especially since she has her own sizeable stash of cash from campaign funds in her home, according to her sworn testimony. She just went through reelection, so excess campaign funds have likely replenished her stash within the last few weeks.

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Why does it take years for courts to decide what normal people realize instantly?

---

Lawyers are involved.

Trajan88 said:

---

Will Fani get wiped and flushed?

Magic 8 Ball says: "Yes"

---

Already spanked

I want him to run the damn table, and I believe what outstanding:

1) reverse the monetary damages to the old hag making up sexual allegations from decades ago

2) toss the BS crazy judge-made-up "inflation of asset values" case and huge penalty

3) reverse the BS Bragg paperwork label "conviction" that violates all reasonable application of the recent scotus ruling about official act immunity


He's got work left to do. Don't let up. It's wishful thinking but I'd love some of these clowns behind it to go to jail or get disbarred or both.

Nice. I am no attorney but I bet its not too often a higher court calls out a lower court judge.

After "carefully considering" the trial court's findings, the appeals court found that McAfee "erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office."

JFABNRGR said:

---

Nice. I am no attorney but I bet its not too often a higher court calls out a lower court judge.

After "carefully considering" the trial court's findings, the appeals court found that McAfee "erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office."

---

It happens quite often to various degrees. That's a mild rebuke just saying McAfee did not go quite far enough in his analysis. That was a reference to time. Back to the investigation and pre-indictment decisions. Wade and by extension Willis had financial incentives to draw the case out by needlessly adding defendants and refusing to bring separate criminal cases. To the tune of slightly less than a million dollars Fanni approved and paid to her boo. And the way they both fought the removal showed they did not want the gravy train to end.

Quote:

---

"Georgia appeals court was right to order that Willis and her entire office must be kicked off this case," Breitbart News's senior legal editor Ken Klukowski said in reaction to the court's decision. "This should effectively end the illegal lawfare in Georgia against the incoming president and the other defendants, as now the cases will be transferred to the district attorney of a different county, who should immediately drop the charges unless that person is a rabid, radical partisan hack like Willis."

"It's disappointing that the appeals court didn't go the extra mile to also dismiss the underlying indictments as unconstitutional, essentially punting on that issue without analysis," he continued. "If Willis attempts to appeal this smackdown to the Georgia Supreme Court, hopefully the state's highest court will have the courage to go the extra mile, or at minimum give a full explanation as to why this prosecution is allowed by the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, and if so then perhaps the U.S. Supreme Court could strike down the indictments."

---

LINK

JFABNRGR said:

---

Nice. I am no attorney but I bet its not too often a higher court calls out a lower court judge.

After "carefully considering" the trial court's findings, the appeals court found that McAfee "erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office."

---

Appellate courts exist to review rulings made in lower courts, that's what they do, so every opinion they issue will say "the lower court erred by…" or "did not err by…"

The opinion doesn't mention McAfee's name once, if that's what you're asking about.

TXAggie2011 said:

---

JFABNRGR said:

---

Nice. I am no attorney but I bet its not too often a higher court calls out a lower court judge.

After "carefully considering" the trial court's findings, the appeals court found that McAfee "erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office."

---

Appellate courts exist to review rulings made in lower courts, that's what they do, so every opinion they issue will say "the lower court erred by…" or "did not err by…"

The opinion doesn't mention McAfee's name once, if that's what you're asking about.

---

Thanks yall, I learned something new today.

Watching the YSL case was enough for me to figure out that office is completely corrupt. Their whole case was based on unreliable jail house snitches and instagram posts. DA Love was completely unorganized and unprofessional. The ex parte with the judge and woody who was already under oath was mind boggling.

It was shocking that the DAs office in a huge area like fulton could operate like this. Completely shocking and appalling.

And if they run the YSL case like that you can bet money the trump case is the same old unorganized mess.

Plus the original hearing with Fani… the contempt for the process was visible. She could care less about answering to the public. Of all cases trumps would be the one to be so above board no one could even accuse you of anything. But shes so arrogant she just thinks she can do whatever. And the public will pay for it.

And she must think we are all a bunch of dumbasses to tell us that she keeps large sums of money at home with no record of where it came from. Just magically appears i guess.

SparkleAg said:

---

Watching the YSL case was enough for me to figure out that office is completely corrupt. Their whole case was based on unreliable jail house snitches and instagram posts. DA Love was completely unorganized and unprofessional. The ex parte with the judge and woody who was already under oath was mind boggling.

It was shocking that the DAs office in a huge area like fulton could operate like this. Completely shocking and appalling.

And if they run the YSL case like that you can bet money the trump case is the same old unorganized mess.

Plus the original hearing with Fani… the contempt for the process was visible. She could care less about answering to the public. Of all cases trumps would be the one to be so above board no one could even accuse you of anything. But shes so arrogant she just thinks she can do whatever. And the public will pay for it.

And she must think we are all a bunch of dumbasses to tell us that she keeps large sums of money at home with no record of where it came from. Just magically appears i guess.

---

Judge Glanville let her get away with a crap ton of improper procedure and just crappy questioning, constant delays, etc. It took nine months to seat a jury for instance. How they hadn't already lost a few jury members nearly a year later begs believability.

But then Glanville was booted and a new judge assigned who didn't put up with DA Love's nonsense and the case just fell completely apart.

When Ashleigh Merchant was on with Megyn Kelly yesterday, she made reference to Anna Cross, an Assistant DA on the Trump case, who flat out just up and walked away, never to return to the courtroom during Terrance Bradley's hemming and hawing testimony. She quit the case. Unclear if she is even still with Fulton County or has moved on to another county DAs office or in private practice. Probably Anna Cross was the only ethical and competent attorney in that whole office.

Remember that investigator that "lost" all the paperwork? And allowed to testify as some sort of gang expert. I couldnt believe it was allowed to go on and on. They should have offered plea deals long before wasting all that money and time.

SparkleAg said:

---

Remember that investigator that "lost" all the paperwork? And allowed to testify as some sort of gang expert. I couldnt believe it was allowed to go on and on. They should have offered plea deals long before wasting all that money and time.

---

Again, that all went back to Judge Glanville not running his court. And he was the supervising judge for that district so there was not another judge to pull him aside and tell him to cut the crap. As the supervising judge, it was Glanville who oversaw and managed the other judge's dockets so the workloads were pretty much equalized. By allowing his courtroom to be monopolized by this this one case (not the same as saying he did not address other matters during that time but most of his time was spent on just this case) directly affected the other judges within his supervisory control. Not a good way to handle his duties and colleagues.

Quote:

---

there was, in fact, a conflict of interest that arose when Willis hired special prosecutor Nathan Wade and proceeded to have an undisclosed affair with him during the prosecutorial process.

---

Ya think?

91AggieLawyer said:

---

Quote:

---

there was, in fact, a conflict of interest that arose when Willis hired special prosecutor Nathan Wade and proceeded to have an undisclosed affair with him during the prosecutorial process.

---

Ya think?

---

Between us lawyers, neither the trial court or appellate court said there was an actual conflict of interest.

The trial court said the opposite, and the appellate court accepted that and only considered if the trial judge abused his discretion in crafting the remedy.

Not sure where that quote in the OP is from, it is not sourced, but it is incorrect.

Quote:

---

Although the trial court found "insufficient evidence of an actual conflict of interest[,]" it also concluded that the record made at the evidentiary hearing established that the District Attorney's prosecution is encumbered by an appearance of impropriety. (Opinion page 11)

---

Quote:

---

Although the trial court found "insufficient evidence of an actual conflict of interest[,]" it also concluded that the record made at the evidentiary hearing established that the District Attorney's prosecution is encumbered by an appearance of impropriety. (Opinion page 11)

---

And the evidentiary hearing McAfee held, the subject of financial aspects were curtailed by what he would allow as relevant. Having a continuing personal pecuniary interest in pressing this unwieldy case would have been evidence of a conflict. Judge didn't want to hear about that because he had an election to win. As did Fani.

Not that voters of Fulton County GAS about rampant corruption in the DAs office. They are quite used to it by now.

🚨Breaking🚨

Fani Willis has been disqualified from the case against President Trump!pic.twitter.com/xzWQQ5ZOH7

— Brenden Dilley (@WarlordDilley) December 19, 2024

BREAKING: Judicial Watch just announced that they have evidence that confirms that Fani Willis & the Biden DOJ colluded to "get Trump."

"They already lied to me, and to Judicial Watch and the American people that they didn't have any records at all... And now they just confirm… pic.twitter.com/SDdXmTgqRW

— George (@BehizyTweets) December 27, 2024

Now that Trump won all sorts of things will come out about all these lawfare cases.

There needs to be consequences for what Dems tried to do to him or else they'll keep doing it. Justice is not to be weaponized against political opponents.

Rudebaeger said:

---

I am surprised that this has not been brought up, but she committed pergury when lied under oath about not having a relationship with Wade.

The state of Georgia should begin prosecution shortly.

---