How the White House kept Brandon hidden

10,270 Views | 90 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by Trajan88
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

i think it's funny that the white house and media think they kept old dirty diaper hidden. everyone knew he was a vegetable when he took office. this came as no surprise to really anyone. the media acts surprised but they were part of the cover. this surprised no one.


You're right when it comes to people who actually are in tune, political junkies, but the average or below average person which is the vast majority of Americans didn't know they truly did not know, and they believed anything that the media would tell them outside of Fox News and Newsmax
Rex Racer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Rex Racer said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

What a scam. It's unreal that people voted for that lying, unethical vegetable.
That's correct. It is unreal. It didn't happen.
Well, some people voted for him. There are even Concerned Moderates on here who did so.
True enough. Just not 80 million.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hard to believe there are posters on this forum who actually defended this POS throughout his term. They are either blind, dishonest, or dumb.
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somewhere in hospice, Jimmy Carter is breathing a sigh of relief...
jefftip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just wait till the next wave of pardons. Thats who has been running the country for 4 years. It's going to be a long list.
milner79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kool said:

LMCane said:

fc2112 said:

titan said:

THAT is what needs to be revealed. Who were the unelected individuals criminally running American from Jan 2021 to actually the present still?


This has been discussed at length here. It starts with Jill Biden, who was the driving force behind his reelection campaign since she liked the power so much.

Ron Klain and Jeff Zients have been flying cover on a day to day basis.

the WSJ article lists some of them:

Blinken
NSA Sullivan
Yellen
True. I didn't want to just cut and paste the entire article. Not sure how long it takes before it comes out from behind the paywall. With regards to some of the other comments here, I really don't think the Wall Street Journal has been very complicit in helping to hide Brandon all of these years. They have moved from the right to right-of-center over the years in my opinion, but they have been plenty critical of him during his Administration.

Disagree. WSJ, in my observation, for four years never dug deep into or pushed the issue of Biden's lack of fitness for office and the inarguable national security issues attached to his health condition (until now, I guess; I've not read this article yet). WSJ has its place in the line of complicit media.
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

Once again F16 posters have been proven correct...

Now Sharp should definitely give us the reward he offered.
Farmer_J
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Not one single story, leak. or unnamed source reported on his mental condition.

Every journalist that covered this up needs to be banned from the white house press corps
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The hell of it is, the level of gaslighting was every bit as strong, to pretend Heels had a brain and the capability to run the country - by these same despicable, America-hating commie *******s. 100% treasonous.

I hope we eventually find out more and shine a light on the players. In fact we piss off so much money anyway, Kash should set up a task force to uncover the truth. This would be run independently of his primary job of gutting the agency of bad actors.
I don't think you know me.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

THAT. Very much so.
BboroAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Journalist? If you are employed by the MSM you are lots of things, but journalist ain't one of them
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
milner79 said:



Disagree. WSJ, in my observation, for four years never dug deep into or pushed the issue of Biden's lack of fitness for office and the inarguable national security issues attached to his health condition (until now, I guess; I've not read this article yet). WSJ has its place in the line of complicit media.
And clear constitutional issues, since the people running the country and making decisions are in no way accountable to the electorate.
BigOil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Sharp as a tack"
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another thread devoid of libs.

Hmmmmm.
Red Dane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's funny to me is that Politico hailed the Haitians eating pets as their "Lie of the Year" and not the fact that they and every other media DNC puppet has spent half a decade telling us that Biden is sharp only to have to pivot 180 degrees after an hour of debate.
NU '95 Texas A&M '97
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't forget how enabling the Republican congress sheep that allowed all of this to persist.
Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Highway6 said:

Worst President in history. Thanks libs
Hands down. And oddly enough, we're lucky they didn't invoke the 25th amendment. Harris would have been even worse. Not to mention, what a huge disappointment it would have been for her to have been the first female president and to also back into it. Wouldn't have been deserving or qualified in any capacity.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Touchless said:


And oddly enough, we're lucky they didn't invoke the 25th amendment.
yet
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Touchless said:

Highway6 said:

Worst President in history. Thanks libs
Hands down. And oddly enough, we're lucky they didn't invoke the 25th amendment. Harris would have been even worse. Not to mention, what a huge disappointment it would have been for her to have been the first female president and to also back into it. Wouldn't have been deserving or qualified in any capacity.
Not to mention would have been truly a case of the Democrat's claim and complaint about W happening - - "Selected, not Elected" -not even by a primary! By none of their voters.

Glad women realized not to fall for the MSM pitch on that score -- the first female President needs to be a positive and memorable.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kool said:

LMCane said:

fc2112 said:

titan said:

THAT is what needs to be revealed. Who were the unelected individuals criminally running American from Jan 2021 to actually the present still?


This has been discussed at length here. It starts with Jill Biden, who was the driving force behind his reelection campaign since she liked the power so much.

Ron Klain and Jeff Zients have been flying cover on a day to day basis.

the WSJ article lists some of them:

Blinken
NSA Sullivan
Yellen
With regards to some of the other comments here, I really don't think the Wall Street Journal has been very complicit in helping to hide Brandon all of these years. They have moved from the right to right-of-center over the years in my opinion, but they have been plenty critical of him during his Administration.


Editorial page - yes, plenty critical

The WSJ news side is just the straight propaganda you would find at the NYT, CNN, ABC, etc.
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty ironic the dems pushed the 25th on Trump based on mental fitness. He called out Biden years ago. Now look at Biden.

Farmer_J
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BboroAg said:

Journalist? If you are employed by the MSM you are lots of things, but journalist ain't one of them


I was too lazy to put "journalist" in quotes.
laavispa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK so what we all suspected is now in the sunshine now begs the question: ' How exactly legal are the documents Biden signed in the past 4 years?"

Obviously the WH, VP and cabinet members FAILED their responsibility under the 25th Amendment,
--------------
Nobody with open eyes can any longer doubt that the danger to personal freedom comes chiefly from the left. F. A. Hayek



SuhrThang
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden doesn't deserve the blame. He didn't call the plays. Let's blame Obama and his band of freaks.

It's time for Jill to spill the beans!
“A drunkard’s dream if I ever did see one”
EskimoJoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The same people who lied about Biden's mental decline also told you Kamala is not dumb, she ran a perfect campaign, and is very qualified to win the presidency.

They wonder why fewer and fewer trust the mainstream media.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Highway6 said:

Worst President in history. Thanks libs
If we elected Kamala, Biden would have definitely lost that title. That woman is a walking, talking, and addled cretin.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big Al 1992 said:

From Hot Air - we've all known this.

"Joe Biden's legacy is not going to be a good one, and it's not just because he was rotten on domestic policy, worse on foreign affairs, and decaying faster than the Halloween Jack-O-Lantern in November. All that is true. But the reason Biden will not age will in the history books is because deep down, he's a nasty, bitter, vindictive, corrupt old man who has treated everyone around him akin to how Capone treated Chicago. 32 Days to go, and they can't fall off the calendar fast enough. "
It's a shame the senility seems to have deflected all the evidence of corruption, in most people's minds.

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

titan said:

THAT is what needs to be revealed. Who were the unelected individuals criminally running American from Jan 2021 to actually the present still?


This has been discussed at length here. It starts with Jill Biden, who was the driving force behind his reelection campaign since she liked the power so much.

Ron Klain and Jeff Zients have been flying cover on a day to day basis.
I suspect Joe ran for President to run out the clock on SOL, and paper over the Obama/Biden crimes and pardon his family's criminal acts.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember when the media and Democrats said Trump was unfit for office because he held a handrail and walked slowly down a metal ramp with dress shoes on?
laavispa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

MAUREEN CALLAHAN: The terrifying scandal is that Biden was NEVER president. The full truth about the cover-up, Bad Doctor Jill and all the enemies within must be exposed
Quote:

We've always known Biden's legacy was going to be one of decrepitude, deceit and dirty dealings. But on his ignominious way out the door, Biden has revealed his true self: Perpetually aggrieved.
A malignant narcissist who put his own thirst for power above party and country.
A loser so sore that he pardoned his son Hunter defying a pledge never to do so, a pledge he made repeatedly and more than 1,500 others, including: Two Chinese spies who stole top-secret American tech information and the relative of a Chinese Communist Party member who possessed thousands of child porn images.
That's Biden for you, the man Barack Obama said has an uncanny ability to 'f*** things up'.
The biggest humiliation of all: it now seems clear that Joe Biden, who only ever wanted to be president, was never running the world. He was never the actual American president. There will forever be an asterisk next to his name.
So, we ask again: Just who has been running the country for the past four years? As that live TV debate proved beyond a doubt, it sure as hell hasn't been Joe.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14211289/Joe-Biden-health-Jill-exposed-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html

IMO this coverup is light years worse than Watergate................
--------------
Nobody with open eyes can any longer doubt that the danger to personal freedom comes chiefly from the left. F. A. Hayek



annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

What a scam. It's unreal that people voted for that lying, unethical vegetable.


Mainly because they knew he wouldn't be in charge. And their irrational hatred of Trump makes them idiots.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EskimoJoe said:

The same people who lied about Biden's mental decline also told you Kamala is not dumb, she ran a perfect campaign, and is very qualified to win the presidency.

They wonder why fewer and fewer trust the mainstream media.
not perfect..

FLAWLESS CAMPAIGN!!
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Martin Q. Blank said:

Highway6 said:

Worst President in history. Thanks libs
If we knew who that was. "His aides did this, his aides did that..." Was the country being run by a group of interns in their 20s?

Some lawmakers on the call believed someone behind the camera was shutting it down.

Who were these people behind the camera and what authority did they have?
That has been the important question from the beginning. Biden would be in public and shoot his mouth off about something like saying we support Taiwan's indeoendence, then the next morning some minor state department underling would come out and say "oh the president just misspoke, of course we still be in the one china policy and nothing has changed in that relationship". Says who? I know what the guy that was actually elected to run the country just said. Now who is going around behind him and deciding he didn't mean what he just said and telling some state dept flunky to go countermand the statement by the elected president of the country? Who has been doing that for the last four years and under what authority?
Kool
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

Martin Q. Blank said:

Highway6 said:

Worst President in history. Thanks libs
If we knew who that was. "His aides did this, his aides did that..." Was the country being run by a group of interns in their 20s?

Some lawmakers on the call believed someone behind the camera was shutting it down.

Who were these people behind the camera and what authority did they have?
That has been the important question from the beginning. Biden would be in public and shoot his mouth off about something like saying we support Taiwan's indeoendence, then the next morning some minor state department underling would come out and say "oh the president just misspoke, of course we still be in the one china policy and nothing has changed in that relationship". Says who? I know what the guy that was actually elected to run the country just said. Now who is going around behind him and deciding he didn't mean what he just said and telling some state dept flunky to go countermand the statement by the elected president of the country? Who has been doing that for the last four years and under what authority?
From the article:

"Senior advisers were often put into roles that some administration officials and lawmakers thought Biden should occupy, with people such as National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, senior counselor Steve Ricchetti and National Economic Council head Lael Brainard and her predecessor frequently in the position of being go-betweens for the president."

"Some donors said they noticed how staff stepped in to mask other signs of decline. Throughout his presidencyand especially later in the termBiden was assisted by a small group of aides who were laser focused on him in a far different way than when he was vice president, or how former presidents Bill Clinton or Obama were staffed during their presidencies, people who have witnessed their interactions said."

These aides, which include Annie Tomasini and Ashley Williams, were often with the president as he traveled and stayed within earshot or eye distance, the people said. They would often repeat basic instructions to him, such as where to enter or exit a stage."

Obviously, it was a carefully choreographed process with lots of enablers. I thought it was always understood that it was Ron Klain who was the actual President for the first two years, the only question was just how far up his tookus Obama's hand went. My assumption would be it went up very far.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Fins Up!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stolen elections have consequences.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.