Gaetz steps down from AG Nomination

16,904 Views | 258 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by Fat Black Swan
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phatbob said:

Say what you want about the accusations against him, but the way this all went down looks bad for him. He resigned immediately the week before the ethics report would have been release for a job he decided he wasn't going to even try to get confirmed for? Even if the reports are 100% false, this just has very bad optics.


The only thing with the potential to be false at this point are the accusations of underage sexual encounters. For everything else there are receipts.

The guy is obviously a sexual deviant regardless
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Blackhorse83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Plug in Kash Patel for DOJ instead of FBI. He can root out the scummers in the FBI at the same time.
Scouts Out
WestTexasAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaetz is a clown. Plus he looks like Butthead. BYE.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WestTexasAg said:

Plus he looks like Butthead. BYE.
Hard-hitting analysis.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Either this was some 4D Chess move that is hard to see at this point or someone really screwed up advising Trump to do this. If it is the latter it's a really foolish maneuver showing that there are some folks advising Trump that don't know how to play the game. I have my suspicions but I'll see how this plays out. It definitely is an egg on face move that gives the Dems and RINOs a W right now.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good to know Trump has learned from the past and had a game plan going forward
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

The Swamp


Nah, the walls are just closing in on a guy with too many skeletons in the closet.

It's incredibly obvious at this point there's some really damning stuff that was going to come to light if he remained in public life.

Completely baseless accusation. Nice.


There are financial records and emails documenting his use of prostitutes.

Now sure, the underage boy/girl stuff may very well be false. But we're at the point where that's a question for the legal side of things. He's clearly not a viable candidate for AG of the United States regardless.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Part of me wants him to nominate Paxton now, but I'm afraid that would cause just as many issues/distractions.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The libs are out in force.

I hope you reap what you sow
William Foster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BoydCrowder13 said:

Dude a coward or are there actual skeletons?
Definitely doesn't help that he looks like a sleazy Dick Tracy villain.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

Logos Stick said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

The Swamp


Nah, the walls are just closing in on a guy with too many skeletons in the closet.

It's incredibly obvious at this point there's some really damning stuff that was going to come to light if he remained in public life.

Completely baseless accusation. Nice.


There are financial records and emails documenting his use of prostitutes.

Now sure, the underage boy/girl stuff may very well be false. But we're at the point where that's a question for the legal side of things. He's clearly not a viable candidate for AG of the United States regardless.


Your DOJ investigated and cleared him. Just stop with your bull**** accusations.
halfbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If it had been a 17-year-old boy he wouldn't have had any problems
Bob Knights Paper Hands
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The media, the left, and the establishment Rs will come after anyone Trump nominates for AG. Change the name but not the game. Burn it all down.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
now is not the time for boneheaded picks

just because the guy hangs out like a sycophant at Mar A Lago as often as he can.
William Foster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Serious question, how do Trump and/or his advisors not completely vet someone like this before nominating them? There shoul dbe no stone left unturned...I would even subject an AG candidate who has been accused of sexual improprieties to a polygraph test.
SA68AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaetz was a bad choice.

Hopefully DeSantis, Cruz, Lee or Whitacker will be nominated
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Obligatory headline...

Gaetz Pulls Out!
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Logos Stick said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

The Swamp


Nah, the walls are just closing in on a guy with too many skeletons in the closet.

It's incredibly obvious at this point there's some really damning stuff that was going to come to light if he remained in public life.

Completely baseless accusation. Nice.


There are financial records and emails documenting his use of prostitutes.

Now sure, the underage boy/girl stuff may very well be false. But we're at the point where that's a question for the legal side of things. He's clearly not a viable candidate for AG of the United States regardless.


Your DOJ investigated and cleared him. Just stop with your bull**** accusations.


They cleared and didn't want to release. Aka persecution didn't look good.

Hell, it might be lots of their coffins once Trump is in office
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
William Foster said:

Serious question, how do Trump and/or his advisors not completely vet someone like this before nominating them?
They did vet him.

They miscalculated their ability to get 50 votes.

I'm Gipper
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

Logos Stick said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

The Swamp


Nah, the walls are just closing in on a guy with too many skeletons in the closet.

It's incredibly obvious at this point there's some really damning stuff that was going to come to light if he remained in public life.

Completely baseless accusation. Nice.


There are financial records and emails documenting his use of prostitutes.

Now sure, the underage boy/girl stuff may very well be false. But we're at the point where that's a question for the legal side of things. He's clearly not a viable candidate for AG of the United States regardless.

win a massive landslide victory in November.

then spend first weeks of Administration defending a Botox blowhard Florida State grad

who most likely used prostitutes and leftists have all the receipts.

there are a lot of dumb people in the country- but NO ONE can believe that is a good strategy for a new Administration!
knoxtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Central Committee said:

It was a horrible nomination by Trump. I love most of his picks but not this one. Everyone hates this guy. Trump needs a bulldog AG like Obama had in Holder, but appointing someone that even your own party hates is not a smart move.

On an unrelated note, I am holding out hope that Trump nominates Cruz to the SCOTUS when Clarence Thonas retires. That would cause the most epic meltdown by the Dems.


I am a moderate dem and I wouldn't be overly upset by Cruz.

Cruz wouldn't do it as it would cost him too much money.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gaeilge said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

Dude a coward or are there actual skeletons?


He's pissed in too many RINOs cheerios. Can't get enough GOP senate votes

He pissed off more than RINO republicans.
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Bob Knights Paper Hands said:

The media, the left, and the establishment Rs will come after anyone Trump nominates for AG. Change the name but not the game. Burn it all down.
Yeah. This is the fault of the media. The guy is probably a pedo, but let's ***** about the messenger.
Gig 'Em
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
William Foster said:

Serious question, how do Trump and/or his advisors not completely vet someone like this before nominating them? There shoul dbe no stone left unturned...I would even subject an AG candidate who has been accused of sexual improprieties to a polygraph test.


8 years later and they still can't figure out the personnel part.

Dems will cry foul on most nominees. The important thing is to not make their jobs easy. Gaetz was an easy target. Trump's team should have known that.

Most of the other positions are getting support.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't understand that pick anyway.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

Gaeilge said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

Dude a coward or are there actual skeletons?


He's pissed in too many RINOs cheerios. Can't get enough GOP senate votes

He pissed off more than RINO republicans.


Lots of bleeding liberals

just look at the posters here trying to post in a "got ya" way
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MTG and Grassley should release all of the covered up payments and investigations. Let's have a true bonfire on the Hill. Then Trump release the Epstein lists once in office and all the evidence that goes with that.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

William Foster said:

Serious question, how do Trump and/or his advisors not completely vet someone like this before nominating them?
They did vet him.

They miscalculated their ability to get 50 votes.

Yes they should have vetted.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
infinity ag said:

Im Gipper said:

William Foster said:

Serious question, how do Trump and/or his advisors not completely vet someone like this before nominating them?
They did vet him.

They miscalculated their ability to get 50 votes.

Yes they should have vetted.
They did.

None of this stuff in the House Ethics Committee reports is new information.

I'm Gipper
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

why do so many Trump fans believe there is ONLY ONE qualified person in a country of 330 million -

I think after Sessions and Barr, and then the complete weaponization of DOJ and FBI that we've seen for the past four years under Merrick, people want the opposite to come in with a sledge hammer to that department and were open to the idea of brining in one that has been attacked by it before.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

Im Gipper said:

William Foster said:

Serious question, how do Trump and/or his advisors not completely vet someone like this before nominating them?
They did vet him.

They miscalculated their ability to get 50 votes.

Yes they should have vetted.


I know you're a troll and you know that he had been. Do better
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

Kansas Kid said:

Gaeilge said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

Dude a coward or are there actual skeletons?


He's pissed in too many RINOs cheerios. Can't get enough GOP senate votes

He pissed off more than RINO republicans.


Lots of bleeding liberals

just look at the posters here trying to post in a "got ya" way

It's funny. They've been missing since Kamala got her A handed to her. They got a victory here and are back to gloat.

It's like when we celebrated a defensive stop when OU kicked our rear 77-0.
TexasAggie81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Central Committee said:

It was a horrible nomination by Trump. I love most of his picks but not this one. Everyone hates this guy. Trump needs a bulldog AG like Obama had in Holder, but appointing someone that even your own party hates is not a smart move.

On an unrelated note, I am holding out hope that Trump nominates Cruz to the SCOTUS when Clarence Thonas retires. That would cause the most epic meltdown by the Dems.


1000 stars for this comment. I said from the beginning that he was not a good pick and that he would end up being a liability.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexasAggie81 said:

Central Committee said:

It was a horrible nomination by Trump. I love most of his picks but not this one. Everyone hates this guy. Trump needs a bulldog AG like Obama had in Holder, but appointing someone that even your own party hates is not a smart move.

On an unrelated note, I am holding out hope that Trump nominates Cruz to the SCOTUS when Clarence Thonas retires. That would cause the most epic meltdown by the Dems.


1000 stars for this comment. I said from the beginning that he was not a good pick and that he would end up being a liability.


You get that he still has picks and is playing a good game?
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Self described moderate dem?

Pretty sure the regular democrats think you are Nazi.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.