Washington Examiner: Senate GOP must stop Tulsi Gabbard

1,762 Views | 19 Replies | Last: 10 days ago by AgNav93
agaberto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
her views toward all of the United States's key adversaries make her plainly unsuited for this role. Put simply, Gabbard openly blames the U.S. rather than its adversaries for the threats they pose to U.S. national security.

On China, in a statement happily regurgitated by Chinese state media, Gabbard previously called on Trump to end the "destructive trade war with China." The former congresswoman also pushed the narrative offered by China sympathizers, such as Ray Dalio, that China should be treated as a partner rather than as an exigent national security threat.

On Russia, Gabbard opposed Trump's removal from the Intermediate Nuclear Forces treaty in response to rampant Russian breaches of that treaty. She has blamed NATO and the U.S. for Russia's invasion of Ukraine (again, to the celebration of both Russian and Chinese state media), has repeated Russian propaganda claims that the U.S. has set up secret bioweapons labs in that country, and has argued that the U.S. not Russia is wholly responsible for Putin's nuclear brinkmanship.

On Syria, Gabbard has gone far beyond Trump's skepticism for continued U.S. military presence in the country. Regurgitating propaganda from Syrian President Bashar al Assad's regime, she has blamed Trump for Syria's challenges and expressed sympathy for Assad's leadership. Assad, it should be noted, has starved, barrel bombed, and otherwise taken the lives of hundreds of thousands of his own people since the 2011 start of the Syrian civil war.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/3229135/senate-gop-must-stop-tulsi-gabbard-from-getting-keys-to-intelligence-castle/

The swamp is filled with NeoCon warhawks just like the Cheney's. They are servants of the Military Industrial Complex. We do not need that anymore.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's apparent the Washington Examiner missed what happened last week.
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know people don't want to hear this, but there are going to be complications with including known liberals in the administration.
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Your post doesn't make sense. Her views on China, Russia, and Syria are all de-escalating, not pro-war Neocon views. Yet you end your post with...

"The swamp is filled with NeoCon warhawks just like the Cheney's. They are servants of the Military Industrial Complex. We do not need that anymore."

She's the opposite of the swamp. Pretty much the same views as RFK as well.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The world needs peace first and foremost, as long as we can get a good deal. I trust the Trump administration
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Washington examiner article reads like it was written by Dick Cheney
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JB99 said:

The Washington examiner article reads like it was written by Dick Cheney

"Did you know some people don't like drone striking weddings in the Middle East?? What sort of traitors are they??"
TexasAggie_97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If the media is against anything Trump is trying to do, then I am all for it.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phatbob said:

I know people don't want to hear this, but there are going to be complications with including known liberals in the administration.

Did you know Trump used to be a democrat? Just like Tulsi.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Phatbob said:

I know people don't want to hear this, but there are going to be complications with including known liberals in the administration.

Did you know Trump used to be a democrat? Just like Tulsi.
Yes, my statement still stands.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phatbob said:

Rockdoc said:

Phatbob said:

I know people don't want to hear this, but there are going to be complications with including known liberals in the administration.

Did you know Trump used to be a democrat? Just like Tulsi.
Yes, my statement still stands.

You'll be ok. Take a pill.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr. Fingerbottom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

Phatbob said:

Rockdoc said:

Phatbob said:

I know people don't want to hear this, but there are going to be complications with including known liberals in the administration.

Did you know Trump used to be a democrat? Just like Tulsi.
Yes, my statement still stands.

You'll be ok. Take a pill.


Maybe not


Some cms stay broken
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tulsi Gabbard was put on a flying watch list that very few knew even existed. And for what, because she refused to be a token democrat. I for one am happy of her role at the DNI. Maybe she can find actually intelligence inside the intelligence agency.
The voices in my head are fighting, one of my imaginary friends is running with scissors and 2 of my personalities have escaped.
geoag58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Phatbob said:

Rockdoc said:

Phatbob said:

I know people don't want to hear this, but there are going to be complications with including known liberals in the administration.

Did you know Trump used to be a democrat? Just like Tulsi.
Yes, my statement still stands.

You'll be ok. Take a pill.


And make sure it is the red pill.
Fight against the dictatorship of the federal bureaucracy!
Texas Yarddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JB99 said:

The Washington examiner article reads like it was written by Dick Cheney


Probably isn't too far off. I expect some MIC clown wrote it. Forever wars and money laundering in the form of rebuilding countries that we just destroyed brings in a lot of money.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Psycho Bunny said:

Tulsi Gabbard was put on a flying watch list that very few knew even existed. And for what, because she refused to be a token democrat. I for one am happy of her role at the DNI. Maybe she can find actually intelligence inside the intelligence agency.


That alone can create a rethink regarding every aspect your party and your peers told you was truth about the nation.


Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas Yarddog said:

JB99 said:

The Washington examiner article reads like it was written by Dick Cheney


Probably isn't too far off. I expect some MIC clown wrote it. Forever wars and money laundering in the form of rebuilding countries that we just destroyed brings in a lot of money.

Don't let the "we need Ukraine and Russia to slaughter each other for our country's military to function" posters hear you. They are so bloodthirsty.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
they must have done something bad to Tulsi and now know that she will try to get them back? wonder what she knows?
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rocky the dog said:

It's apparent the Washington Examiner missed what happened last week.
Who once said, "elections have consequences?" If the pigs in the uni-party are squealing I'm good with it. Enough with the status quo.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.