NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory laying off 5%

786 Views | 3 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by torrid
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like they cannot compete with SpaceX. Musk owning SpaceX and being in charge of cutting waste means JPL is in trouble. You cannot just take in billions and not deliver anything like the good old days.

Layoffs hit NASA Jet Propulsion Lab

By Emma W. Thorne, Editor at LinkedIn News
Updated 1 hour ago

Quote:

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory is laying off about 5% of its workforce on Wednesday. That's 325 jobs lost, on top of the 530 cut in February. The lab, which is responsible for developing robotic space probes, has faced a number of challenges this year, including a pause in some funding. The cuts are hitting "essentially all areas of the Lab," Director Laurie Leshin wrote in a memo to staff. In recent years, JPL has seen increased competition from a number of private companies, including SpaceX and Lockheed Martin.


Here is what someone says on Linkedin.
Quote:

Kevin Watson Principal Engineer, Flight Computing at The Exploration Company

JPL is having another large round of layoffs this week. I spent the first twenty-three years of my career there and it was a pretty amazing experience. However, times have changed and finding the budget for a $2B Mars rover is going to be hard when SpaceX can do it for $200M. NASA needs to adapt and work on cutting-edge projects that industry can't or won't do. I left JPL in 2008 for SpaceX and haven't looked back. The job market is pretty hot in the Los Angeles area and hopefully those that lost their job can find a fun job elsewhere.



Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mouthball NASA and award contracts to SpaceX and Blue Origin.

**** Boeing until they get their **** together.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SpaceX should have no effect on JPL, which builds and handle the probes and rovers.

The only launch vehicle NASA even has is the SLS. Every other US launch vehicle is by either SpaceX, ULA, Northrop Grumman, or Blue Origin, assuming the latter ever actually flies. (Yes, there are some other start ups, but as of right now, they don't matter.)
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

SpaceX should have no effect on JPL, which builds and handle the probes and rovers.

The only launch vehicle NASA even has is the SLS. Every other US launch vehicle is by either SpaceX, ULA, Northrop Grumman, or Blue Origin, assuming the latter ever actually flies. (Yes, there are some other start ups, but as of right now, they don't matter.)
This. JPL makes stuff that goes on SpaceX rockets. This probably means less stuff for SpaceX to launch. All of the best NASA stuff is done out of JPL.

I worked on the fringe of the space program for a few years. I was turned off by the bureaucracy, but I got to work on one JPL-led project. Probably the highlight of my career.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.