The Limbaugh Theorem and Biden/Harris

3,352 Views | 23 Replies | Last: 10 days ago by MookieBlaylock
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those who have been around a while and who listened to Rush Limbaugh may remember The Limbaugh Theorem. Rush came up with The Limbaugh Theorem to explain how Obama remained popular while his governance was often punitive to America and Americans and many of his policies were very unpopular.
Since Limbaugh began talking about this, the term "gaslighting" was coined, and today's marxist democrat party employs the tactic daily. And they openly lie to our faces. They are a completely anti-American political party without a scintilla of ethics among them.

From the transcript of the Rush Limbaugh show June 7, 2013:

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/06/07/try_to_explain_the_limbaugh_theorem/


Quote:

"Basically I evolved the Limbaugh Theorem to explain something that didn't make any sense to me. I saw polls which showed the American people by vast majorities supported Obama's agenda, and yet every aspect of it they opposed. They didn't associate him with it. It was a New York Times story. I'll never forget it. The American people opposed the direction the country's going, and issue by issue by issue they opposed everything Obama was doing. Every element of the Obama agenda, a majority of the people oppose it, and yet they support him by 50, 55%. I said, "How can this be?"

There's only one answer. People do not associate Obama with his agenda, and that's because he's permanently campaigning. He's running against his own agenda, by design, on purpose. He's running against what's happening. He makes people think that he doesn't like what's happening and he's trying to fix it when in fact everything that's happening is precisely because he wants it to and has made it happen."

Once Biden took office, his cabal employed this strategy constantly. Biden (his propagandist mouthpieces mostly) lied to us daily about the things we could see with our own eyes, i.e. "the border is secure," "the economy is great," and many, many more. They went from disassociation to their own policies to flat-out lying about what their policies were. And to make it worse, their tactic was to never explain WHY they opened the border, WHY they spent trillions unnecessarily, WHY they removed sanctions from Iran. WHY their policies on everything put America and Americans last. They just did it.

No legitimate press conferences. No input from Americans. Just ruling by fiat without any accountability.
Enter Kamala Harris. She was installed as the democrat candidate by democrat power brokers AFTER their low information voters had affirmed Biden. Kamala is not intelligent enough to pour piss out of a boot, so she could not possibly give policy positions. She could not possibly answer Americans' questions, so she didn't. She stood before us all and constantly claimed she would do everything as president that she and Biden have not done while in office, while simultaneously claiming that there is nothing she would have done differently than Biden. Americans had long since tired of the excuses and the lies.

I am posting all of this because it comes back to Barack Hussein Obama's "fundamental transformation." Government employees openly revolting against their ultimate boss is something that used to be extremely rare. Now, many leftist "public servants" see it as their duty. Our federal ranks need to face draconian cuts. To the bone.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has anyone else noticed that the left doesn't challenge the politicians they elect? They all seem contempt with "whatever".
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Their tactic that started with Biden was just to do it and never answer for it. We still don't actually know who has run the country since January 20, 2021, and millions of Americans voted to continue with no accountability.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Every new socialist policy has been sold as a fix for the consequences of previous socialist policies.

It's like all the drugs that are taken to deal with the side effects of other drugs.

They are always sold as "we aren't doing enough to combat X" when what they were doing in the first place is what made it worse. You can't even blame it on malfeasance, it's just what happens when their worldview is wrong.
chilimuybueno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Always someone else to blame. Always must be victims. That's the way of the Democratic Party.
Txmoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was recently listening to a podcast that talked about the early days of the socialist/communist/marxist movements in the U.S. that cropped up in the 60s. Early influencers for Obama, like Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrs, etc. While listening to that, I realized that Obama probably realized that the biggest mistakes those early radicals made were being honest about who they were and what they wanted to do. Clearly he learned from their mistakes.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The left has realized that lying is effective, and even moreso when the media carries your water. There is nothing the mainstream media will not cover up for them.
EllisCoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
they were using the Jedi mind trick, "there is nothing to see here"
I wanna see our defense pissed off, not confused, maybe a little murder in their hearts Reload12, 11/4/11
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Has anyone else noticed that the left doesn't challenge the politicians they elect? They all seem contempt with "whatever".
They also never tell you who they are, they only tell you who they aren't.

Remember Kamala saying - "I'm not Joe Biden" and "I'm not Donald Trump"

A guy I used to enjoy listening to on the radio during afternoon drive in Los Angeles was Tom Leykis.

Leykis's intro focused on who he was NOT. It's kind of sad but he's really losing it over Trump getting elected a 2nd time.

In fact, so much so that he's bailed out of X and apparently the new Lefty safe space on social media is called Blue Sky.
https://bsky.app/profile/tomleykis.bsky.social

agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't recall which poster said it but in 2012 they started a thread entitled "I know how Obama is going to win a second term"

The text of the post was "he's going to lie"
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't need any algorithims or stats to come to that conclusion.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Since Limbaugh began talking about this, the term "gaslighting" was coined, and today's marxist democrat party employs the tactic daily


Quote:

Movie - 1944

After the death of her famous opera-singing aunt, Paula Alquist (Ingrid Bergman) is sent to study in Italy to become a great opera singer as well. While there, she falls in love with charming Gregory Anton (Charles Boyer). After the two return to London, Paula begins to notice strange goings-on: missing pictures, strange footsteps in the night, and gaslights that dim without being touched. As she fights to retain her sanity, her new husband's intentions come into question
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sometimes ai pulls facts outta its digital ass.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe I should have said "gaslighting became a mainstream political term."

We have never seen the blatant gaslighting and lying that we are seeing now.
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obama was an Alisky-ite and followed his strategies to a tee. Tell everyone that you hate what is happening and that's it's because of the political enemies, all while you are doing, planning, or have done everything that you are complaining about in public.
He did this with Wall Street. Called them Fat Cat Brokers all the time. Yet always got their financial backing. Why? Because he used legislation to "protect investors" by making managed accounts mandatory as a "fiduciary standard". That made those fat cat brokers on Wall Street about 4-5x what they made on investment accounts. What a joke that all wasand then used the Department of Labor, not the SEC or Treasury to enforce it.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OP - so true. Rush is missed. He must be smiling.
Marvin J. Schiller
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most of the left are either rich elites who don't care how bad things are or dip**** marxist converts who revel in how bad things are.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see this has been answered
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Maybe I should have said "gaslighting became a mainstream political term."

We have never seen the blatant gaslighting and lying that we are seeing now.

Agreed. Politicians always lie, but the Democrats of today have turned it up to 11.

Fifty years ago, you could hide the truth. Not so much now. Yet, that just seems to make them lie harder.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Every new socialist policy has been sold as a fix for the consequences of previous socialist policies.
Truer words were never spoken.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Maybe I should have said "gaslighting became a mainstream political term."

We have never seen the blatant gaslighting and lying that we are seeing now.

Agreed. Politicians always lie, but the Democrats of today have turned it up to 11.

Fifty years ago, you could hide the truth. Not so much now. Yet, that just seems to make them lie harder.
For sure. The campaign commercials this cycle from Allred and Harris were 12 Pinocchios bad. I don't even think their true believers believed them. I cannot understand how anyone can defend those lies, much less vote for the liars who push them. It's insulting to our intelligence.
Ridgeback85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77 said:

Quote:

Since Limbaugh began talking about this, the term "gaslighting" was coined, and today's marxist democrat party employs the tactic daily


Quote:

Movie - 1944

After the death of her famous opera-singing aunt, Paula Alquist (Ingrid Bergman) is sent to study in Italy to become a great opera singer as well. While there, she falls in love with charming Gregory Anton (Charles Boyer). After the two return to London, Paula begins to notice strange goings-on: missing pictures, strange footsteps in the night, and gaslights that dim without being touched. As she fights to retain her sanity, her new husband's intentions come into question

The term doesn't even make sense unless you have seen the movie.
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Maybe I should have said "gaslighting became a mainstream political term."

We have never seen the blatant gaslighting and lying that we are seeing now.


take the L - you are making it worser
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.