DC Appeals court (1st circuit) nukes EPA regs

1,566 Views | 8 Replies | Last: 16 days ago by Clavell
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, really, that happened today, during the transition of power.

Quote:

The decision was written by Karen LeCraft Henderson (George H. W. Bush) and A. Raymond Randolph (George H. W. Bush) with Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan (Joe Biden) dissenting, and it found:
Quote:

As the parties argue the case, it centers on whether the Agencies complied with regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality, an entity within the Executive Office of the President. We will not address these arguments. The CEQ regulations, which purport to govern how all federal agencies must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, are ultra vires.
Ultra vires means the CEQ was acting "beyond the legal scope of it authority."

The court goes on to detail the shenanigans by which an advisory body with no regulatory authority was able to write environmental regulations for the entire United States for nearly a half-century just because it decided it could.

Making the case even more awesome is that it was set off by enviro-wackos suing the FAA for allowing sightseeing flights near some national parts. The enviros claimed the FAA used the wrong standard established by the CEQ to permit the flight. They ended up being right in a backhanded kind of way.

This decision throws the entire environmental regulation scheme governing the federal government into chaos. I suspect that many of the CEQs regulations will be reissued by other agencies, but after Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (see The Supreme Court Firebombs the Administrative State and Tells Congress to Get Off Its Butt and Work) that slew the medusa called "Chevron deference, the survival of those replacement regulations is not assured.
Is anyone tired of winning, yet?
Quote:

The silver lining is that Trump's EPA, under Lee Zeldin (see We Have Another Trump Cabinet Pick: Lee Zeldin Gets the Nod), will get the first crack at reworking useless and expensive regulations.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a huge win. Burdensome regulation kills business. It's a much needed step in taking back power and drastically reducing the impact of the federal bureacracy.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Making the case even more awesome is that it was set off by enviro-wackos suing the FAA for allowing sightseeing flights near some national parts."



Sounds like the federal version of peeping Toms.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Huge win.


(Fyi: this was DC Circuit, not First Circuit)

I'm Gipper
Mr. Fingerbottom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amazing how everyone is deciding to behave all of a sudden
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep!!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good catch, my bad. Thinking USPTO etc. Got excited.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Yes, really, that happened today, during the transition of power.

Quote:

The decision was written by Karen LeCraft Henderson (George H. W. Bush) and A. Raymond Randolph (George H. W. Bush) with Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan (Joe Biden) dissenting, and it found:
Quote:

As the parties argue the case, it centers on whether the Agencies complied with regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality, an entity within the Executive Office of the President. We will not address these arguments. The CEQ regulations, which purport to govern how all federal agencies must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, are ultra vires.
Ultra vires means the CEQ was acting "beyond the legal scope of it authority."

The court goes on to detail the shenanigans by which an advisory body with no regulatory authority was able to write environmental regulations for the entire United States for nearly a half-century just because it decided it could.

Making the case even more awesome is that it was set off by enviro-wackos suing the FAA for allowing sightseeing flights near some national parts. The enviros claimed the FAA used the wrong standard established by the CEQ to permit the flight. They ended up being right in a backhanded kind of way.

This decision throws the entire environmental regulation scheme governing the federal government into chaos. I suspect that many of the CEQs regulations will be reissued by other agencies, but after Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (see The Supreme Court Firebombs the Administrative State and Tells Congress to Get Off Its Butt and Work) that slew the medusa called "Chevron deference, the survival of those replacement regulations is not assured.
Is anyone tired of winning, yet?
Quote:

The silver lining is that Trump's EPA, under Lee Zeldin (see We Have Another Trump Cabinet Pick: Lee Zeldin Gets the Nod), will get the first crack at reworking useless and expensive regulations.


Clavell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spent most of my 36 year career dealing with environmental issues for a chemical company. You can follow all the regulations, court decisions, EPA guidelines, and federal register discussions all you want, but if the EPA regulator wants to decide against you have no chance. At the end of the day their interpretation of the nebulous and conflicting regulations rule.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.