Do you believe Harris can win 270+ electoral votes without widespread voter fraud?

4,908 Views | 92 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by BenFiasco14
fightingfarmer09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A +10% difference is 41k. That's where it's dangerous to look at EV and spike the football.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
William Foster said:

richardag said:

The most egregious fraud is the MSM incessantly spewing lies and suppressing the truth about the Harris/Walz agendas.
If we had any semblance of an honest media the Harris/Walz campaign would have trouble getting 5% of the vote.
That, and the FBI and intel community literally conspiring with big tech and media to influence the 2020 election. That is ON TOP of the cheating that occured in swing states.
Yes the FBI & Intel community were equally as guilty.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Kellso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mostly Foggy Recollection said:

ScoopsCalla said:

Raiderjay said:

ScoopsCalla said:

With trends increasingly looking like Kamala will win, just curious how people are feeling about this
What "trends"???
early voting returns/analysis and polls in battleground states


I guess you're seeing something different than me. And EV analysis/trends paint a much better picture in 2024 than in 2020. Harris won't capture a single sun belt state.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/
Donald Trump is currently the favorite to win on Tuesday.....but Kamala is making a spirited comeback.
The Democrats think they have the votes in the key states to pull the upset on Tuesday night.

Kamala Harris has 3 days to make her case to become the United States first female president.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PA24 said:

For all practical purposes, the sides are picked with the winner taking all. I believe Trump will be declared the winner and will win with over 300 electoral votes. The democrats can't do massive voter harvesting like they did in 2020, too many eyes are watching and that is the reason their early voting numbers are down.

Trump/Vance 2024
I hope you are correct.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScoopsCalla said:

With trends increasingly looking like Kamala will win, just curious how people are feeling about this
Don't put too much stock in polls run by people who start the day by " Huffing "
#FJB
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, she can
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ScoopsCalla said:




This guys were off in 2020 by
+3.8 D in PA
+5.2 D in MI
+9 D in WI

If the same that means Trump:
+2 in PA
+2 in MI
+6 in WI
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As stated earlier, AtlasIntel was the most accurate pollster in 2020 and they had all swing states going for Trump by varying amounts.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course she cannot win without cheating. And neither could Biden. But this time, their are eyes looking for it.
AC Hopper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Do you believe Harris can win 270+ electoral votes without widespread voter fraud?

I believe Harris will win the contest -- without cheating, fraud, funny business, etc.
Permit me with the following hypothetical to explain why.

Picture a candidate for President, in a contest described from the beginning as a dead heat, buggering a dog on television every day for the past 30 days while making speeches that appeal only to their base of support which is comprised of approximately 35 to 40 per cent of the voting population.

Sorry, my friends, but Donald Trump in my opinion has screwed the pooch. I can see by the look in the eyes of campaign handlers that they too believe that.
Buck Turgidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No way that cackling ****** ever wins anything but California and similarly far left states without rampant cheating.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You talking bout Kamala? The one who only goes on friendly channels, does interviews that last 30 mins or less time in which the questions are highly curated, uses popular bands to get people in the doors of her rallies, doesn't do press conferences? The one who didn't get a single delegate's vote in two presidential primaries? That one?

Or the one who goes on padcast of people for and hour or two or 3 at a time with people who aren't necessarily supportive of him? The one who goes into the Bronx. a place where is sure to lose, and have a rally here?

Shirley, you can't be serious
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thunderstruck xx said:

jejdag said:

It's just galling that this skank is even in the contest. Never voted on by the dems, appointed because of pigmentation and genitalia, no leadership accomplishments of note, no speaking abilities, and I could go on but why? EVERYONE knows it, even the other side, but here we are in a so-called tight race.
It defies logic.



I think this is the media lying about it being close to try to motivate democrats to vote.
And provide cover like 2020. As others have said, if d we had an honest press and not a propaganda wing of the left, it wouldn't even be close. It would rival Mondale bad.
AggieAL1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

This is my map right now. Outside of the seven key battleground states, I think these states are fairly locked up. Am I off base here?



It all comes down to what you think will happen in those seven states.
Can't argue with your map, but it seems Trump faces an uphill battle. He could need two of the three Blue Wall states to pull it off. Pennsylvania is the prize for both.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kellso said:

Mostly Foggy Recollection said:

ScoopsCalla said:

Raiderjay said:

ScoopsCalla said:

With trends increasingly looking like Kamala will win, just curious how people are feeling about this
What "trends"???
early voting returns/analysis and polls in battleground states


I guess you're seeing something different than me. And EV analysis/trends paint a much better picture in 2024 than in 2020. Harris won't capture a single sun belt state.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/
Donald Trump is currently the favorite to win on Tuesday.....but Kamala is making a spirited comeback.
The Democrats think they have the votes in the key states to pull the upset on Tuesday night.

Kamala Harris has 3 days to make her case to become the United States first female president.
Ironic, first female and dumbest president at the same time.
BillYeoman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. I don't think she could win without fraud. Just like I didn't believe Maduro could "win" this last July. Despite the polls and evidence. There will come a time where evidence won't matter and the collective narrative is all the "evidence" you'll need to be a "good"American
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

It doesn't take wide spread voter fraud. It takes very narrow voter fraud in a few select zip codes to turn an election


2020 says Hi.
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
boredatwork08 said:

Is the voter fraud here in the room with us right now?


Wow. I think the election fraud group is nuttier than a fruitcake, this made me spit my food out. Well done.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just to entertain the troll...


No
Danny Vermin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump has never had such backup that resonates with more than just conservatives. If you don't think having Elon, RFK , Tulsi Vivek etc behind him won't make a difference, you're dumber than Kamala.
tizzizzailslf04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some of you can not be real people, lol.

The country is much bigger than your Texas suburb.

But if telling yourself that a democrat winning = voter fraud helps you cope, then you gotta do what you gotta do, I guess?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes I do and easily Kamala is going to win easily and early on Tuesday imo
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tizzizzailslf04 said:

Some of you can not be real people, lol.

The country is much bigger than your Texas suburb.

But if telling yourself that a democrat winning = voter fraud helps you cope, then you gotta do what you gotta do, I guess?


Did you feel a little tingle down your leg when you hit "Post" on this?

CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.