November Surprise by the Daily Beast: Trump & Epstein in the 90s

4,658 Views | 71 Replies | Last: 16 hrs ago by austinAG90
Kunkle for Congress TX-34
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:59a, 11/1/24
Last ditch effort by the left...Tying Epstein to Trump in the 90s. Supposed photos.

Breaking now:
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."
Reply Quote
bmks270
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:09p, 11/1/24
AG
100 hours of tapes of Epstein talking about Trump?

I just flatly don't believe that.

100 hours is a lot of hours and beyond believable.

That would be 50 two-hour conversations.

Does he have tapes? Maybe, but if these tapes exist it's way more likely to be less than 10 hours.

And such tapes would have already been released if there was anything really damning.
Reply Quote
57
1 edit
VegasAg86
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kunkle for Congress TX-34 • 12:09p, 11/1/24
AG
Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:
Last ditch effort by the left...Tying Epstein to Trump in the 90s. Supposed photos.

Breaking now:
lol, the FBI has pictures of Trump at Epstein's pool with topless young girls sitting on his lap, and they're sitting on them?
Reply Quote
58
Get Off My Lawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bmks270 • 12:11p, 11/1/24
The only way you get to 100 hours is with ai fabrication
Reply Quote
33
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:14p, 11/1/24
I said two weeks ago that they were going to play the Epstein card on Trump just before the election.

Democrats are nothing if not predictable.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
27
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:18p, 11/1/24
AG
Ok, show us the Epstein card. Let's see the pics.
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:20p, 11/1/24
AG
So the FBI had all this for 5 years and has been sitting on it all this time, being reported by a left wing hack that wrote 3 books about disfunction in the Trump administration. If it even exists, which I doubt, it's highly likely 100% deep fake.
Reply Quote
30
C@LAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:22p, 11/1/24
if i were trump, i would demand they release the actual evidence publicly.

Reply Quote
12
bmks270
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:22p, 11/1/24
AG
Why is this guy meeting with Epstein in 2017, and recording it, and what would Epstein know about Trumps administration?
Reply Quote
4
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag87H2O • 12:23p, 11/1/24
Ag87H2O said:
So the FBI had all this for 5 years and has been sitting on it all this time, being reported by a left wing hack that wrote 3 books about disfunction in the Trump administration. If it even exists, which I doubt, it's highly likely 100% deep fake.
If they were going to drop an Epstein nuke on Trump, it would have been just before early voting started to ensure maximum damage.

Since this is just some hack making claims, without any kind of proof, it reeks of just throwing **** against the wall and hoping it sticks.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
22
SW-14
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 12:24p, 11/1/24
AG
Yep, if it actually were real, it doesn't make sense to release now that millions of votes have already been cast.
Reply Quote
3
C@LAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:24p, 11/1/24
In before NYT and WAPO have it as the main headline.
Reply Quote
8
BenFiasco14
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 12:24p, 11/1/24
AG
Rapier108 said:
I said two weeks ago that they were going to play the Epstein card on Trump just before the election.

Democrats are nothing if not predictable.


And yet again it's projection. Trump wants to jail his enemies they say, as Steve Bannon and Paul Manafort just got out of prison. As j6 inmates locked up as political prisoners. As Trump under countless indictments.

Now this laughable attempt to connect Trump to Epstein. Where's the Epstein client list? Can someone explain the bill clinton painting? Why did William Barrs father hire Jeffrey Epstein to teach at a college with no experience? Why was Barr the one who put Epstein away? Why are certain names in the client list circled? Why was an investigation into Epstein in the early 2000s squashed? Why was bill gates hanging out with them all the time? Why was Prince Andrew involved? Did the royal family play a part in this too? How about Hollywood?

Trumps connection to Epstein is de minimis at best yet we know for a fact countless celebrities and politicians from all over the world are implicated in underage sex trafficking. The details have been under intense lock and key. Yet, the daily beast somehow is able to access some of this and it's magically only about Trump?

**** off. Nobody's buying this ****
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Reply Quote
18
MostlyHarmless
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to C@LAg • 12:30p, 11/1/24
AG
C@LAg said:
if i were trump, i would demand they release the actual evidence publicly.


Release ALL evidence related to Epstein, including the Epstein list. If Dems want to play with fire, let them get burned.
Reply Quote
18
bmks270
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 12:30p, 11/1/24
AG
Rapier108 said:
Ag87H2O said:
So the FBI had all this for 5 years and has been sitting on it all this time, being reported by a left wing hack that wrote 3 books about disfunction in the Trump administration. If it even exists, which I doubt, it's highly likely 100% deep fake.
If they were going to drop an Epstein nuke on Trump, it would have been just before early voting started to ensure maximum damage.

Since this is just some hack making claims, without any kind of proof, it reeks of just throwing **** against the wall and hoping it sticks.


This author has already written 3 books in Trump since 2018. So why drop this news now when these supposed conversations and recordings with Epstein supposedly go back to at least 2017…???

Looking over the author's body of work and criticisms he seems like a hack who makes stuff up to get sales.
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 12:30p, 11/1/24
AG
Rapier108 said:
Ag87H2O said:
So the FBI had all this for 5 years and has been sitting on it all this time, being reported by a left wing hack that wrote 3 books about disfunction in the Trump administration. If it even exists, which I doubt, it's highly likely 100% deep fake.
If they were going to drop an Epstein nuke on Trump, it would have been just before early voting started to ensure maximum damage.

Since this is just some hack making claims, without any kind of proof, it reeks of just throwing **** against the wall and hoping it sticks.
Yeah, if they really had anything like this they would have used it during the 2020 campaign, or at any time between then and now to keep Trump from even running again.

This late in the game means it's just another desperate attempt by the left to sway the naive masses.

Reply Quote
5
agsalaska
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:32p, 11/1/24
AG
If true it Would have been released two weeks ago.
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.



Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Yukon Cornelius
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:33p, 11/1/24
AG
So why not just release the Epstein client list?
Reply Quote
18
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:33p, 11/1/24
"I think we have a snippet of one of the conversations I recorded...."

"I think this was in a restaurant in 2017..


what does he mean "I think"
this is some dodgy ****
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
f1ghtintexasaggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:33p, 11/1/24
Release the unredacted client list, you ****ing cowards!
Reply Quote
16
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:35p, 11/1/24
AG
It's garbage stories seeking attention and relevance and possibly fake. They need to release it late enough to possibly matter without time to verify and discredit it.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Bobaloo
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:36p, 11/1/24
Lets see the photos and if the girls were hot...
Reply Quote
1
4stringAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:38p, 11/1/24
AG
Nothing surprises me at this point. I wouldn't doubt at least MSNBC picks this up if not the major networks as well. They are "all in" on getting Trump so it doesn't matter to them whether its vetted or not. One source is enough.
Reply Quote
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to C@LAg • 12:40p, 11/1/24
AG
C@LAg said:
In before NYT and WAPO have it as the main headline.


This is Steele dossier revisited. They will say "according to an article in daily beast" that way when proven false they can say they didn't break the story.
Reply Quote
2
The Banned
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag87H2O • 12:41p, 11/1/24
Ag87H2O said:
So the FBI had all this for 5 years and has been sitting on it all this time, being reported by a left wing hack that wrote 3 books about disfunction in the Trump administration. If it even exists, which I doubt, it's highly likely 100% deep fake.


Yep. Done all they can to convict him of a crime and just let this one slide. Totally buying it
Reply Quote
5
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:41p, 11/1/24
just from that snippet it sounds like Epstein is frustrated he can't get a good read or grip on the Trump admin.
Reply Quote
1
Woods Ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:42p, 11/1/24
AG
Right before the election, without any time for it to be destroyed and tossed away as another lie.

Get ****ed you pieces of ***** Burn in hell
Reply Quote
1
P.U.T.U
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:42p, 11/1/24
AG
If the Dems are so much against Epstein then release everything on him, if it takes down both parties so be it.
Reply Quote
4
Fishing Fools
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:43p, 11/1/24
Not sure how this would affect Trump voters since we're all deplorables and garbage. Throw in ignorant white trash?
Reply Quote
3
policywonk98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:45p, 11/1/24
AG
Who's going to change their vote or go from not voting to voting against Trump based of this information 5 days before Election Day? A five day window that includes a weekend.

At best I suppose it fires up the progressive faithful. Making sure they maximize their turnout.

But stories like this, since they harken back to the FBI/Hillary created PeePee tapes, also helps to maximize the turnout for those in the electorate that see this for what it is.

The libs must be feeling pretty desperate.



Reply Quote
2
Wabs
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:48p, 11/1/24
AG
Reply Quote
9
Thunderstruck xx
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kunkle for Congress TX-34 • 12:49p, 11/1/24
Didn't read LOL.

Already early voted for Trump.
Reply Quote
3
Bob Knights Paper Hands
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:50p, 11/1/24
From the available clip, it sounds like this guy followed Espstein around and recorded him ranting about Trump. Is that the bombshell? That a liberal was recorded complaining about Trump during his first term?
Reply Quote
1
schmellba99
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:52p, 11/1/24
AG
Go ahead and dump all of these pics and proof. Along with the list of Epstein's clients and every single bit of pics of everybody else. Let the chips fall where they fall.

I'm betting the fallout would be world wide and brutal, and doubt seriously it would end the way this author and every TDS CM and libtard think it would.
Reply Quote
3
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:52p, 11/1/24
AG
No one is changing their vote at this point.

They sure are desperate over there.
Reply Quote
4
Last Page
Page 1 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.