C@LAg said:

---

I really really hope she's the first thrown in the gulag

---

I hope he is half the tyrannical fascist they say he will be. Half joking.

The Kraken said:

---

1939 said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

How, exactly, is Liz Cheney a "war hawk"?

---

Give us an example of a single foreign conflict that we have been either directly or indirectly involved in that she hasn't fully supported.

---

Which ones were you not in support of? 95% of F16 was in favor of going to Iraq 22 years ago.

---

We were wrong.

BigFred said:

---

Trump can never commit enough crimes to be a criminal.

He can never perform enough lewd acts to be non-Christian.

He can never say enough stupid things to be stupid.

Maga has made him immune to be anything but Heroic. Yes, It's sad but revealing.

---

Sounds exactly like you with the dems. If this were Biden, Kamala, or anyone else saying this (and yes, they've all said FAR WORSE), you'd be the first defending them and explaining what they meant, or providing the full quote.

He was clearly saying if you send people to war, you may think differently if it was you in their shoes.

I don't always agree with how trump comes off or the exact words he uses. Nor do I need to "defend" him (there's nothing to even need to defend here). But if you aren't so brainwashed, you could see the actual point he makes rather than immediately going to faux outrage.

The House needs to subpoena her and Kinzinger... put them under oath and pick their agenda out ... have them answer for the dog and pony Jan. 6th committee.

Add Stretch Pelosi too if a sitting House member can be subpoenaed.

BusterAg said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

1939 said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

How, exactly, is Liz Cheney a "war hawk"?

---

Give us an example of a single foreign conflict that we have been either directly or indirectly involved in that she hasn't fully supported.

---

Which ones were you not in support of? 95% of F16 was in favor of going to Iraq 22 years ago.

---

That doesn't mean we didn't learn our lesson from that debacle.

I don't think you would find many people on this site that would say, in retrospect, Iraq war was a huge F'ing mistake.

That would be a legitimate case of learning a hard lesson at a giant, unimaginable, heart-breaking cost. Not a flip-flop, as you are insinuating.

---

I think you meant to write "wouldn't say" instead of "would"

Of course Iraq was a mistake. One we all paid a price for, some more deeply than others.

Just curious what constitutes a "war hawk" and why Liz Cheney is being accused of being one. The connection seems to be her father.

1939 said:

---

Their actions and strategy. We were on the brink of war with them prior to Trump being elected and calming the situation.

---

Nobody wants war with N Korea. Let Fat Boy do his thing and keep his country in their dictatorial Communist paradise, just don't threaten the region and the USA with his rhetoric and weapons.

Silent For Too Long said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

1939 said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

How, exactly, is Liz Cheney a "war hawk"?

---

Give us an example of a single foreign conflict that we have been either directly or indirectly involved in that she hasn't fully supported.

---

Which ones were you not in support of? 95% of F16 was in favor of going to Iraq 22 years ago.

---

We were wrong.

---

I agree. Michael Moore was correct.

Silent For Too Long said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

1939 said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

How, exactly, is Liz Cheney a "war hawk"?

---

Give us an example of a single foreign conflict that we have been either directly or indirectly involved in that she hasn't fully supported.

---

Which ones were you not in support of? 95% of F16 was in favor of going to Iraq 22 years ago.

---

We were wrong.

---

We were misled..

The Kraken said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

1939 said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

How, exactly, is Liz Cheney a "war hawk"?

---

Give us an example of a single foreign conflict that we have been either directly or indirectly involved in that she hasn't fully supported.

---

Which ones were you not in support of? 95% of F16 was in favor of going to Iraq 22 years ago.

---

That doesn't mean we didn't learn our lesson from that debacle.

I don't think you would find many people on this site that would say, in retrospect, Iraq war was a huge F'ing mistake.

That would be a legitimate case of learning a hard lesson at a giant, unimaginable, heart-breaking cost. Not a flip-flop, as you are insinuating.

---

I think you meant to write "wouldn't say" instead of "would"

Of course Iraq was a mistake. One we all paid a price for, some more deeply than others.

Just curious what constitutes a "war hawk" and why Liz Cheney is being accused of being one. The connection seems to be her father.

---

You can google the definition.

The faux outrage! Liz Cheney is a clown.

I really don't know how you can't see this my man. The entire reason all the neocons have switched parties is because they are the stooges of the military industrial complex and Trump made it perfectly clear he wasn't going to play their evil little games anymore.

Why else did the Cheney's and Bolton and the rest jump ship? Because of principles?

damiond said:

---

This is how dictators destroy free nations. They threaten those who speak against them with death. We cannot entrust our country and our freedom to a petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man who wants to be a tyrant. #Womenwillnotbesilenced #VoteKamala https://t.co/URH5s929Sa

— Liz Cheney (@Liz_Cheney) November 1, 2024

more nazi rhetoric from the radical left and their agents trying to gaslight normies into thinking they are civil

---

There is only one candidate this cycle that was shot by an assassin. And it wasn't a democrat

The Kraken said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

1939 said:

---

The Kraken said:

---

How, exactly, is Liz Cheney a "war hawk"?

---

Give us an example of a single foreign conflict that we have been either directly or indirectly involved in that she hasn't fully supported.

---

Which ones were you not in support of? 95% of F16 was in favor of going to Iraq 22 years ago.

---

That doesn't mean we didn't learn our lesson from that debacle.

I think most people on this site, even the ones that originally supported the IRAQ war, would say, in retrospect, the Iraq war was a huge F'ing mistake.

That would be a legitimate case of learning a hard lesson at a giant, unimaginable, heart-breaking cost. Not a flip-flop, as you are insinuating.

---

I think you meant to write "wouldn't say" instead of "would"

Of course Iraq was a mistake. One we all paid a price for, some more deeply than others.

Just curious what constitutes a "war hawk" and why Liz Cheney is being accused of being one. The connection seems to be her father.

---

Correct. Typo. I cleaned up my double negative in your quote.

MelvinUdall said:

---

What a deceptive piece of editing, everyone should watch the full clip and not just this little part where she made a threat to her…my gosh,

---

Happens allllll the time. Saw on Reddit them quoting JD Vance on Rogan incorrectly to make Jd Look bad.

FriendlyAg said:

---

MelvinUdall said:

---

What a deceptive piece of editing, everyone should watch the full clip and not just this little part where she made a threat to her…my gosh,

---

Happens allllll the time. Saw on Reddit them quoting JD Vance on Rogan incorrectly to make Jd Look bad.

---

anything bad the msm says about the right is actually good

anything good the msm says about the left is actually bad

Who's idea was it to unban Manny the week before the election?

TA-OP said:

---

Do Republicans ever tire of making up excuses for this guy? I'm so tired of the Hitler blame game and claiming their side can ever do anything wrong. Such hypocrites.

---

Says group who found a mysterious apostrophe in Biden's Garbage rant

BigFred said:

---

"Lets put her in front of a firing squad with guns aimed at her face"

Trump says the most bizarre, un-hinged, unsafe things ever spoken as a political candidate, (forget presidential candidate)

---

Is that his quote Fred? At least you have the dem lying part down.

Nine guns? What does that mean? That is reasonably interpreted as a firing squad. Guns pointed at her face? That does not sound like a battle scenario but more like a firing squad.

Great, four more years of, "here's what he really meant to say....." Trump needs a translator to interpret "the weave" a/k/a dementia.

Trump is one or more of these:
1) dumb
2) crazy
3) has dementia
4) a closet (not so closeted, he said it directly) wanna be dictator who will seek retribution against his perceived enemies.

Coulda had DeSantis. I voted Libertarian. Can't vote for either bozo on the ticket. I don't want to hear cackles or "the weave."

GeorgiAg said:

---

Nine guns? What does that mean? That is reasonably interpreted as a firing squad. Guns pointed at her face? That does not sound like a battle scenario but more like a firing squad.

---

9 is a number. Just a number. Would it be better at only 8, or 10?

Not to be a dick, but...you have a law degree!?

Why don't you go read the whole statement by Trump and see what you think. As a lawyer I would think you know what "context" means. But being a lib, maybe not.

"wElL, wHaT hE mEaNt tO sAy wAs..."

GeorgiAg said:

---

Nine guns? What does that mean? That is reasonably interpreted as a firing squad. Guns pointed at her face? That does not sound like a battle scenario but more like a firing squad.

Great, four more years of, "here's what he really meant to say....." Trump needs a translator to interpret "the weave" a/k/a dementia.

Trump is one or more of these:
1) dumb
2) crazy
3) has dementia
4) a closet (not so closeted, he said it directly) wanna be dictator who will seek retribution against his perceived enemies.

Coulda had DeSantis. I voted Libertarian. Can't vote for either bozo on the ticket. I don't want to hear cackles or "the weave."

---

You conveniently left out the rifle she has. I've never personally witnessed one, but I don't think death row inmates, etc. were ever given a rifle at their executions.

As has been said before, this is an absolutely deceptive X post meant to drive the fascist narrative brought to you by the good folks at:

Russia, Russia, Russia
51 former intelligence officials
Mostly peaceful protests
Vax up or lose your job.
Wiped, like with a cloth?
We're coming for your guns.

But remember, we're the:
Irredeemable, deplorable, garbage

Dude, just watch the entire video. The context is completely obvious.

Why are you so determined to believe lies just so you can fuel your TDS?

GeorgiAg said:

---

Nine guns? What does that mean? That is reasonably interpreted as a firing squad. Guns pointed at her face? That does not sound like a battle scenario but more like a firing squad.

Great, four more years of, "here's what he really meant to say....." Trump needs a translator to interpret "the weave" a/k/a dementia.

Trump is one or more of these:
1) dumb
2) crazy
3) has dementia
4) a closet (not so closeted, he said it directly) wanna be dictator who will seek retribution against his perceived enemies.

Coulda had DeSantis. I voted Libertarian. Can't vote for either bozo on the ticket. I don't want to hear cackles or "the weave."

---

You can't understand or read English?

Ag In Ok said:

---

Pretty sure trump was commenting on her love of war - how would she handle being shot at, no?

Fwiw - I've done a 170 on W, and a full 180 on Cheney - that guy is dark, very dark.

---

It took you guys a couple of decades, pathetic war choices, billions of dollars wasted to make big oil and the MIC rich to come around to how do many of us on the left have always seen Cheney, and I couldn't be more glad to see it.

If I could, I'd throw a "Welcome to the party, pal" meme here for ya.

Anonymous Source said:

---

"wElL, wHaT hE mEaNt tO sAy wAs..."

---

Lol. I mean it's not even what he said.

Context is important. Both sides are great at chopping up videos to show how evil the other side is. It's weak tea.

Having said, Trump know this happens. Hell, he does it. So saying this out loud is pretty f***ing dumb.

You clearly didn't listen. He said if she's such a big fan of sending people to war, why doesn't she go? See how she feels when there's guns pointed at her.

He's making a good point. Not threatening her.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Nine guns? What does that mean? That is reasonably interpreted as a firing squad. Guns pointed at her face? That does not sound like a battle scenario but more like a firing squad.

Great, four more years of, "here's what he really meant to say....." Trump needs a translator to interpret "the weave" a/k/a dementia.

Trump is one or more of these:
1) dumb
2) crazy
3) has dementia
4) a closet (not so closeted, he said it directly) wanna be dictator who will seek retribution against his perceived enemies.

Coulda had DeSantis. I voted Libertarian. Can't vote for either bozo on the ticket. I don't want to hear cackles or "the weave."

---

Good lord man. He was making a point that if she's such a big war hawk and sending people to war she should go out there herself.

Source: I watched this live last night

Ag In Ok said:

---

Pretty sure trump was commenting on her love of war - how would she handle being shot at, no?

Fwiw - I've done a 170 on W, and a full 180 on Cheney - that guy is dark, very dark.

---

Agree Cheney was a snake. But I'll take W over Trump any day of the week and Reagan over both. The only thing that's going to move this country forward is the R's gaining majority in Congress. If the House is lost to the Dems and the Senate doesn't change, Trump will have a very hard time moving the needle with out compromise.

akm91 said:

---

She's the 2024 Cindy Sheehan

---

Sheehan lost a child. Cheney lost an election. Guess which one gets more respect from me.

Everybody knows what Trump was saying. If Cheney was facing guns in HER face in the context of a military war, she probably wouldn't be such a warhawk. That's what he said in context and everyone who is not being fooled by the left knows it. Trump is always and routinely taken out of context in order to make him evil. The left has mastered the art of it. There is no truth in them.

In contrast, I don't think Biden's "garbage" comment was taken out of context. He meant what he said. He may have been thinking about just some of Trump's supporters, but even so, it was still insulting to Trump supporters and he meant it.

Silent For Too Long said:

---

I really don't know how you can't see this my man. The entire reason all the neocons have switched parties is because they are the stooges of the military industrial complex and Trump made it perfectly clear he wasn't going to play their evil little games anymore.

Why else did the Cheney's and Bolton and the rest jump ship? Because of principles?

---

Cheney voted with Trump's position with about 93% of the time, which was more than many other colleagues. She voted against the first impeachment. Why didn't she "jump ship" then?

It was only after the events of Jan 6 that she decided she'd seen enough and voted for the second impeachment. So basically, Trumpers are against her because she called him out on his BS election denialism, claim she's a "warmonger" because her father is Dick Cheney and basically demonize her because she had the political courage to do what she felt was right, unlike most of the GOP who have grown spineless to criticize Dear Leader in the face of MAGA cultism.