I think she's going to win, and yes, I agree with you. It will be one-party rule in the federal executive branch going forward.

Kamala wins, I'll enjoy sitting back and watching the world burn.

If nothing else, the post on F16 will be entertainment.

BMX Bandit said:

---

A Republican will win in 2028 no matter what happens Tuesday

---

Agreed, she will fail, and people will want her out, plus you won't have the Trump effect for some of those voters.

She will replace an aging Thomas, Alito, and/or Roberts with radical leftists.

If she got the House and Senate, they will destroy the filibuster, and she can pick the whole slate of new judges. THAT would be the final trigger for secession because there would be NO safeguards for the GOP/Non-Leftist citizens any longer.

Seems that , no matter the result, some sort of conflict between rioting and street violence, something that resembles the Irish troubles, and/or full on Civil War 2 and secession are all in the 50% or greater possibility. Polling data of the populace seems to confirm this as well.

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

If she wins of course there will be another republican to think otherwise would be extreme. Even if they somehow abolish the electoral college; the party will adapt to the will of the people. The electorate changes over time and the parties must adapt. You could argue there hasn't been a republican president since 2007.

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

Muy said:

---

If she does win, we need the Senate and Hoise to be led by a GOP Majority, and block everything she and the left want to do.

---

You mean the same way they blocked Trump after he won?

Muy said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

---

Blue parachute good sir!!

Honest answer is the Republican Party would spaz out and reflexively nominate the most DEI candidate ever

BMX Bandit said:

---

A Republican will win in 2028 no matter what happens Tuesday

---

Not it Trump wins and the economy nose-dives on his watch thanks to decades of leftists policies.

TheEternalOptimist said:

---

She will replace an aging Thomas, Alito, and/or Roberts with radical leftists.

If she got the House and Senate, they will destroy the filibuster, and she can pick the whole slate of new judges. THAT would be the final trigger for secession because there would be NO safeguards for the GOP/Non-Leftist citizens any longer.

Seems that , no matter the result, some sort of conflict between rioting and street violence, something that resembles the Irish troubles, and/or full on Civil War 2 and secession are all in the 50% or greater possibility. Polling data of the populace seems to confirm this as well.

---

Not very optimistic of you!

Muy said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

---

I'd be okay with bringing along West Virginia, as well. I'm sure we could find plenty of uses for that coal. Charging the northeast a most obscene price for us to "export" it, for example.

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Muy said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

---

I'd be okay with bringing along West Virginia, as well. I'm sure we could find plenty of uses for that coal. Charging the northeast a most obscene price for us to "export" it, for example.

---

Hell, might as well bring in Ohio and Indiana too then. Huge boost on several ag inputs

Gaeilge said:

---

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Muy said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

---

I'd be okay with bringing along West Virginia, as well. I'm sure we could find plenty of uses for that coal. Charging the northeast a most obscene price for us to "export" it, for example.

---

Hell, might as well bring in Ohio and Indiana too then. Huge boost on several ag inputs

---

If succession requires bringing along Dallas, Houston, Austin, San Antonio and the RGV, might as well stay put in the USA. Everywhere is woke AF, even Texas.

sanangelo said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Muy said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

---

I'd be okay with bringing along West Virginia, as well. I'm sure we could find plenty of uses for that coal. Charging the northeast a most obscene price for us to "export" it, for example.

---

Hell, might as well bring in Ohio and Indiana too then. Huge boost on several ag inputs

---

If succession requires bringing along Dallas, Houston, Austin, San Antonio and the RGV, might as well stay put in the USA. Everywhere is woke AF, even Texas.

---

Those cities don't matter when the state is still carried by the non-urban voters. If those cities controlled the state, we'd be deep blue. It would be a hell of a lot easier to control those cities too w/o the backdrop of a liberal federal government.

Ag97 said:

---

The swamp will allow a Republican winner again to make the illusion that we actually have a choice. In truth, the beurocracy controls the government. That's why the beurocracy hates Trump. He isn't part of the club and isn't controllable.

---

I'm forty and just now figuring out we've had an illusion of choice (nearly) my entire life. Thanks Trump.

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

So, SEC ready?

Ag97 said:

---

The swamp will allow a Republican winner again to make the illusion that we actually have a choice. In truth, the beurocracy controls the government. That's why the beurocracy hates Trump. He isn't part of the club and isn't controllable.

---

And this is also why there'll likely never be anyone even remotely like Trump again for the GOP.

Will there be someone who literally signs the exact same EOs that Trump would? Yes. Talk about the exact same issues as Trump would? Yes. Speak in the way maga loves to see Trump speak, though? No, he's one and done.

Even Vance and DeSantis, for as much as they're like by maga, they don't act or speak anywhere near the way Trump does, nor do they "mean tweet". Hence why although they're more conservative than Trump, they're not the top name on the ticket.

There'll be plenty of Republican president's in the future, it's highly likely there'll never be anyone as close to how Trump acts or speaks again, or at least for the near future.

FL_Ag1998 said:

---

TheEternalOptimist said:

---

She will replace an aging Thomas, Alito, and/or Roberts with radical leftists.

If she got the House and Senate, they will destroy the filibuster, and she can pick the whole slate of new judges. THAT would be the final trigger for secession because there would be NO safeguards for the GOP/Non-Leftist citizens any longer.

Seems that , no matter the result, some sort of conflict between rioting and street violence, something that resembles the Irish troubles, and/or full on Civil War 2 and secession are all in the 50% or greater possibility. Polling data of the populace seems to confirm this as well.

---

Not very optimistic of you!

---

He didn't tell you who wins yet

I honestly think Kamala winning would help the Republican party and Conservatism more over the long run than Trump winning. Most citizens haven't suffered or lost enough to truly change their ways and realize the poison dems are peddling.

Sometimes things have to get much worse before they can get better.

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Muy said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

---

I'd be okay with bringing along West Virginia, as well. I'm sure we could find plenty of uses for that coal. Charging the northeast a most obscene price for us to "export" it, for example.

---

Bring Ohio, West Virginia, Nebraska, Indiana, the Dakotas, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Utah and Kansas along for the contiguous new Republic. Arizona and Nevada have to prove themselves.

We would run energy, agriculture for the most part and have most of the beautiful parts of the old republic. Oh, and we would have an insane majority of the guns.....legally purchased ones.

Muy said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

BQAG02 said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

But we'll have a R in the United States of Texas!

---

You misspelled "Republic of Texas"

---

I think if Texas were to ever split (which I don't see happening in my lifetime) you would end up with multiple 'states' along with Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana tagging along at the minimum.

---

Just make the SEC states a new country.

---

If the Tarheel state flips red, North Carolina can tag along too.

Im notnsure Trump will actually prevent it, but we absolutely would be nearing near total de-dolorization and/or a major war before we could assume people caught on to that.

the most cool guy said:

---

I think she's going to win, and yes, I agree with you. It will be one-party rule in the federal executive branch going forward.

---

What was your username last week?

Muy said:

---

If she does win, we need the Senate and Hoise to be led by a GOP Majority, and block everything she and the left want to do.

---

Do you think Harris' puppet masters would give a **** about GOP majorities in the Congress? They'll just go right on doing whatever the f they want, damn the law and damn the will of the voters.

aTmAg said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

A Republican will win in 2028 no matter what happens Tuesday

---

Not it Trump wins and the economy nose-dives on his watch thanks to decades of leftists policies.

---

This is my biggest fear.

After the Spanish flu there was a recessionary period around in 1920/1921 before the Depression hit. We're already seen post-covid recession despite what the Biden Admin says. Right now the economy is a hot potato to saddle around the party in power.