The Commandant while I was there was Col. Parsons for whom Parson's Mounted Calvary is named. He was an outstanding Commandant. It's not the rank that makes a good leader. I don't believe we should limit out search to General Officers.
I believe that Tyson was basically being fast tracked for flag officer when family priorities drove him to resign. I think his senior executive experience with the Foundation more than makes up for his lack of military seniority.oldag941 said:
Didn't he resign from the army as a Captain? I'm all about re-looking the general officer precedent, but some military seniority is probably valuable and necessary.
Yes, no one saw it coming and predicted it weeks ago...HollywoodBQ said:
Wow, I knew Ramirez was going to retire, I didn't know the announcement had already been made.
Looks like it happened today.
https://wtaw.com/texas-am-vice-president-of-student-affairs-and-former-corps-of-cadets-commandant-joe-ramirez-announces-his-retirement/
I'm most familiar with VMI.musicman55 said:
A number of years ago the administration at A&M decided that they preferred to have a flag officer as Commandant because the other SMCs have them, and our folks didn't want our Commandant to be at a disadvantage when dealing with them.
I've spoken with him several times in the past two years. He's not woke.v1rotate92 said:
Only "Knew of" him back in the CorpsHe had an excellent reputation
As long as he isn't woke I'm a yes vote. The fact that he's not a general is good news
I wouldn't think a good strong Colonel is really at any disadvantage dealing with a flag officer. Colonel is the lynchpin positon - one foot in the flag officer political arena, one foot still in the trenches with the men and getting dirty.musicman55 said:
A number of years ago the administration at A&M decided that they preferred to have a flag officer as Commandant because the other SMCs have them, and our folks didn't want our Commandant to be at a disadvantage when dealing with them.