Family of 2 year old Nikki Curtis, who was murdered by Robert Roberson, speak out

1,874 Views | 13 Replies | Last: 10 days ago by eric76
TheWoodlandsTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Family members of Nikki Curtis, the 2-year-old murdered by Robert Roberson, have written to the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee blasting the "one-sided" portrayal given of the killer in their attempt to exonerate him.

Nikki's brother, Matthew Bowman, as well as her aunt Jessica Carriere, and grandfather, Larry Bowman, say they felt the need to come forward due to the committee's actions:

In the ongoing saga surrounding the case of Robert Roberson, we have heard from a wide array of people proclaiming his innocence: from a law enforcement officer who investigated the case, a juror who found him guilty, so-called experts in the media, and even acclaimed TV personalities and best-selling authors. Now, in a last-ditch effort, some members of your committee are proclaiming his innocence, and you have held hearings in an attempt to halt Roberson's execution.


Lost in this parade of people who are overeager to proclaim the innocence of a man found guilty by a jury of his peers are the facts about Nikki Curtis' murder and the voices of those who knew him best and who witnessed the repeated abuse by Mr. Roberson Nikki's family.

Given the one-sided picture of Mr. Roberson that has been recently portrayed in the media, we feel obliged to speak up and defend the real victim in this case, whose life was taken by the hands of Robert Roberson, Nikki Curtis. Nikki's story must be told.

To that end, the family says that Roberson should be put to death based on the facts of the case and the evidence that led to the jury's verdict.

Because so many facts seem to have been intentionally left out of the current conversation surrounding Mr. Roberson's case, we wanted to reiterate several facts, all of which were presented at the trial:
  • When Nikki was brought to the hospital, the following injuries were found:
    • Extensive bruising to her chin, face, ears, eyes, and mouth
    • Handprint on her face
    • Bruised and mushy back of skull
  • The Medical Examiner, Dr. Jill Urban, testified that Nikki died from blunt force head injuries, not from being shaken:
    • 6 supervising medical officers concurred with this assessment
    • No one testified in the original trial that Nikki died because of being shaken
  • Dr. Urban confirmed this assessment in 2016, noting additional evidence Nikki did not die from being shaken, including:
    • Lacerations inside Nikki's mouth
    • Red bruising on the left side and top of Nikki's head Trauma to Nikki's spine, including bleeding of the spine
    • Trauma to Nikki's entire brain that caused Nikki's brain to shift inside her skull, compress her spinal cord, and impede her breathing
  • Robert Roberson had a reported history of sexually and physically abusing two-year-old Nikki Curtis, as well as another little girl, including:
    • Putting his ***** in two-year-old Nikki's mouth
      Rubbing his ***** against two-year-old Nikki's vagina
      Placing a child in a bed of fire ants
      Whipping Nikki when she cried
      Assaulting Nikki with a board and paddle
      Throwing Nikki on the bed so hard she bounced off and hit the floor

Meanwhile, Gov. Greg Abbott has filed a brief in the Supreme Court of Texas to say the committee has overstepped its authority in its efforts to delay Roberson's execution. Last week, a group of lawmakers led by State Rep. Cody Harris, who represents Palestine where the murder occurred, also filed a brief saying the committee was usurping power in its quest to exonerate Roberson.

https://texasscorecard.com/state/family-of-murdered-child-speak-out-as-house-committee-attempts-to-free-killer/

Please stay active in Texas politics. 24 incumbent RINO country club establishment center left liberal Republicans lost in the 2024 Texas Primaries to grassroots and constitutional conservative Republicans. RINOs like Kronda Thimesch, Lynn Stucky, Jacey Jetton, Steve Allison, and former Majority Leader Stephanie Klick. They will be leaving office in January. Stay active in Texas politics by reading Texas Scorecard and keep voting these RINOs out of office in the primaries. The Texas Senate is RINO free, but the Texas House still has some left even after 24 of them lost. Steve Toth and Tony Tinderholt have done an excellent job at exposing the RINO frauds.
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is a very special place in hell for anyone who would do ANY of those things to a child.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Move Robert Roberson to gen pop and let the inmates take care of business
The voices in my head are fighting, one of my imaginary friends is running with scissors and 2 of my personalities have escaped.
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Behind the scenes on this:

  • Scorecard promotes what Tim Dunn wants promoted and Dunn is all about Ken Paxton.
  • Rep Cody Harris (HD-8, Palestine) wants to get back into Paxton's good graces after failed Paxton impeachment trial so he's the henchman behind this from the TXLEGE side.
  • Abbott has dug in his heels on the separation of powers and Roberson will be executed, likely in early 2025

And then there is this:

San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
Ag in Tiger Country
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"On next week's episode..."; this is a ready-made HBO series.

It's all just smoke, mirrors, & posturing for the limelight; meanwhile, a pedo has also been thrust into the public view, but he is enjoying both sympathy & notoriety, which is repulsive as such undoubtedly feeds his ego.

What a shame; just hang the MF'er. The End.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The following are the committee members according to https://house.texas.gov/committees/committee/220

Joe Moody, El Paso, Chair
David Cook, Mansfield, Vice Chair
Salman Bhojani, Euless
Rhetta Andrews Bowers, Garland
Drew Darby, San Angelo
Brian Harrison, Waxahachie
Jeff Leach, McKinney or Allen (not sure)
Christina Morales, Houston
Nate Schatzline,, Fort Worth

https://texasscorecard.com/state/gov-abbott-challenges-house-effort-to-stop-execution-asserts-sole-authority-on-delays/

Quote:

n a last-minute effort, House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee membersled by Democrat State Rep. Joe Moody of El Pasosubpoenaed Roberson to testify before the committee, raising legal questions about the separation of powers.

...

Republican State Rep. Jeff Leach of Allen, a member of the committee, then filed a petition with the Texas Supreme Court, claiming to represent the Texas House of Representatives in the matter.

...

Republican State Rep. Brian Harrison, a member of the Criminal Jurisprudence Committee, is among those backing the efforts of Moody and Leach.

Note that this link about what they are doing is worth reading. I only used it here to identify at least three committee members acting on behalf of Robinson in spite of a lack of standing to do so.
ef857002-e9da-4375-b80a-869a3518bb00@8shield.net
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The committee wanted a stay so they could hear more information on the case related to a Texas law on junk science.

I'm assuming many members of this committee may eventually support execution.

And I will point out again that there's no reliable evidence that the child was ever sexually assaulted. That information came from a cellmate (which makes it highly unlikely to be true) and was not presented at trial.

How much shaken baby syndrome evidence was presented at trial seems to be an issue of quite a bit of dispute.

The committee heard a lot of evidence and then asked for the TRO. They must have heard evidence that caused them concern.

I'm not overly sympathetic to this guy, just concerned about due process. Have to protect his rights so we don't start down the slippery slope of violating everyone else's. If for whatever reason he didn't get a completely fair trial, hold him and give a new trial.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What are they trying to hide?

It appears that the committee's meeting was last Monday (October 21, 2024). Here is the public notice of the meeting:
Quote:

* REVISION **
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING



COMMITTEE: Criminal Jurisprudence

TIME & DATE: 12:00 PM, Monday, October 21, 2024

PLACE: E2.010
CHAIR: Rep. Joe Moody

PLEASE NOTE THE HEARING HAS BEEN MOVED TO E2.010



The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence will hear invited testimony only on the following:

Criminal procedure related to capital punishment and new science writs under Article 11.073, Code of Criminal Procedure.

Electronic public comments may be submitted for:

Criminal Procedure Article 11.073

For those persons who will be testifying, information for in-person witness registration, can be found here: https://mytxlegis.capitol.texas.gov/HWRSPublic/About.aspx

A live video broadcast of this hearing will be available here: https://house.texas.gov/video-audio/

Instructions related to public access to the meeting location are available here: https://house.texas.gov/committees/public-access-house-committee-meetings/

Texas residents who wish to electronically submit comments related to agenda items on this notice without testifying in person can do so until the hearing is adjourned by visiting: https://comments.house.texas.gov/home?c=c220
If that is the meeting in question, they sure do go out of the way to not say what they are doing.

And here are the minutes of the meeting:
Quote:

The House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

88th Legislature

October 21, 2024

12:00 p.m.

Continued on October 22, 2024

E2.010

Pursuant to a notice posted on October 16, 2024, revised on October 18, 2024, the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence met in a public hearing and was called to order by the chair, Representative Moody, at 12:36 p.m.

The initial quorum call was answered as follows: Representatives Moody; Cook; Bhojani; Bowers; Darby; Harrison; Leach; Morales, Christina; and Schatzline.

A quorum was present.

The Chair made opening remarks.

The Committee heard testimony on Criminal Procedure Article 11.073.

Testimony taken/registration recorded. (See attached witness list.)

(Representative Cook in chair.)

Testimony taken/registration recorded. (See attached witness list.)

(Representative Moody in chair.)

Testimony taken/registration recorded. (See attached witness list.)

(Representative Cook in chair.)

Testimony taken/registration recorded. (See attached witness list.)

(Representative Moody in chair.)

Representative Moody moved that the October 16, 2024 minutes for the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence be corrected. The corrected minutes were authorized without objection.

At 9:46 PM, the Chair announced that the Committee would stand at ease pending notification by the chair of a time for reconvening.

Pursuant to a courtesy notice posted on October 21st, 2024, revised on October 22nd, 2024, the Chair called the Committee back to order on October 22nd, 2024 at 2:21 p.m.

At 2:22 p.m. on October 22nd, 2024, on the motion of Representative Moody and without objection, the meeting was adjourned subject to the call of the chair.

If game reports of the LSU game were like this, we wouldn't even know who played, much less who won.
ef857002-e9da-4375-b80a-869a3518bb00@8shield.net
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AtticusMatlock said:

The committee wanted a stay so they could hear more information on the case related to a Texas law on junk science.

I'm assuming many members of this committee may eventually support execution.

And I will point out again that there's no reliable evidence that the child was ever sexually assaulted. That information came from a cellmate (which makes it highly unlikely to be true) and was not presented at trial.

How much shaken baby syndrome evidence was presented at trial seems to be an issue of quite a bit of dispute.

The committee heard a lot of evidence and then asked for the TRO. They must have heard evidence that caused them concern.

I'm not overly sympathetic to this guy, just concerned about due process. Have to protect his rights so we don't start down the slippery slope of violating everyone else's. If for whatever reason he didn't get a completely fair trial, hold him and give a new trial.
He has had his due process.
ef857002-e9da-4375-b80a-869a3518bb00@8shield.net
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And the weird thing about it is he never got to testify. Wasn't the whole point of the TRO so they could have him appear before the committee? That part never happened.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AtticusMatlock said:

And the weird thing about it is he never got to testify. Wasn't the whole point of the TRO so they could have him appear before the committee? That part never happened.
Here is the witness list for the hearing:
Quote:

WITNESS LIST
Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
October 21, 2024 - 12:00 PM
Criminal Procedure Article 11.073

On:

Alcala, Elsa (Self)
Compton, Terre (Self)
Grisham, John (Self)
Judson, Katherine (The Center for Integrity in Forensic Sciences)
McGraw, Ph.D., Phillip (Self)
Montfort, Natalie (Self)
Salzman, Donald (Self)
Sween, Gretchen (Self)


ef857002-e9da-4375-b80a-869a3518bb00@8shield.net
SidetrackAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anti-taxxer said:

There is a very special place in hell for anyone who would do ANY of those things to a child.
Need to make sure his journey there is long slow and painful as possible.
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AtticusMatlock said:

The committee wanted a stay so they could hear more information on the case related to a Texas law on junk science.

I'm assuming many members of this committee may eventually support execution.

And I will point out again that there's no reliable evidence that the child was ever sexually assaulted. That information came from a cellmate (which makes it highly unlikely to be true) and was not presented at trial.

How much shaken baby syndrome evidence was presented at trial seems to be an issue of quite a bit of dispute.

The committee heard a lot of evidence and then asked for the TRO. They must have heard evidence that caused them concern.

I'm not overly sympathetic to this guy, just concerned about due process. Have to protect his rights so we don't start down the slippery slope of violating everyone else's. If for whatever reason he didn't get a completely fair trial, hold him and give a new trial.
I think he had his due process when he went to trial.

From what I have read, it appears that the shaken baby syndrome mentioned at trial was by the defense team. In particular, they seemed to be claiming that he could not have murdered her because he was shaking her. That seems to be a rather interesting, but not real convincing defense strategy.

As I understand it, even if she had died as a result of something he did earlier, it would still be murder. From time to time, people die years after an assault and that results in murder charges. For example, in the bowling alley massacre in Las Cruces, one murder victim died nine years after the massacre.
ef857002-e9da-4375-b80a-869a3518bb00@8shield.net
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.