Doug Emhoff slapped a former girlfriend in 2012

10,054 Views | 79 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by MaroonStain
Keller6Ag91
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to zag213004 • 3:26p, 10/3/24
zag213004 said:
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:
StandUpforAmerica said:
Chris Cuomo making sense again. What's the world coming to?

My question is : why is this coming out now? To damage Kamala and her team?


All the left ( and right if they were in this situation) would need to say is that the candidate's spouse is not running for office.

Is there an example where a Republican had a spouse be accused of something serious like that and the left tried to use that as ammo to discredit candidate (not rhetorical, I really don't know off the top of my head)? I know they got on to the bush kids and I think it was seen as a bad look in the public's eye to attack the kids of a president... However that was much less serious than a domestic violence accusation


It points to character, and if Kamala knew about it, it pointe to her character
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
Reply Quote
BQ78
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to zag213004 • 3:29p, 10/3/24
Not Republican but they besmirched Andrew Jackson because they accused his wife of being a bigamist, pissed him off royally too, he was wanting to demand satisfaction. Helped literally kill her too.
Reply Quote
Burdizzo
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to zag213004 • 3:51p, 10/3/24
zag213004 said:
Urban Ag said:
zag213004 said:
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:
StandUpforAmerica said:
Chris Cuomo making sense again. What's the world coming to?

My question is : why is this coming out now? To damage Kamala and her team?


All the left ( and right if they were in this situation) would need to say is that the candidate's spouse is not running for office.

Is there an example where a Republican had a spouse be accused of something serious like that and the left tried to use that as ammo to discredit candidate (not rhetorical, I really don't know off the top of my head)? I know they got on to the bush kids and I think it was seen as a bad look in the public's eye to attack the kids of a president... However that was much less serious than a domestic violence accusation
Laura Bush killed a high school classmate in a car wreck. They tried to get some traction on that but I don't recall it going anywhere.


Thanks. I did not know that



It was not going to get any votes, and I think cooler heads at the DNC got the message out not to go there anyway. That was a different DNC, and the hate for Bush was not anything comparable to the hate for Trump.
Reply Quote
LeonardSkinner
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:54p, 10/3/24
"Has the Second Gentleman stopped beating his wives?"
Reply Quote
Burdizzo
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LeonardSkinner • 4:46p, 10/3/24
LeonardSkinner said:
"Has the Second Gentleman stopped beating his wives?"



He will get right on that...


...right after he gets off the nanny.
Reply Quote
zag213004
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Keller6Ag91 • 5:46p, 10/3/24
Keller6Ag91 said:
zag213004 said:
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:
StandUpforAmerica said:
Chris Cuomo making sense again. What's the world coming to?

My question is : why is this coming out now? To damage Kamala and her team?


All the left ( and right if they were in this situation) would need to say is that the candidate's spouse is not running for office.

Is there an example where a Republican had a spouse be accused of something serious like that and the left tried to use that as ammo to discredit candidate (not rhetorical, I really don't know off the top of my head)? I know they got on to the bush kids and I think it was seen as a bad look in the public's eye to attack the kids of a president... However that was much less serious than a domestic violence accusation


It points to character, and if Kamala knew about it, it pointe to her character


So if the spouse of the other candidate is advocating for an an action that results in the killing of millions of babies do the flaws of each other's spouses offset this talking point ? (yes there are other things that either side can say to diminish their opponents character besides the actions of their spouses).
Reply Quote
Post removed:
by user
In reply to zag213004 • 5:54p, 10/3/24
Viper16
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Burdizzo • 9:19p, 10/3/24
Burdizzo said:
LeonardSkinner said:
"Has the Second Gentleman stopped beating his wives?"



He will get right on that...


...right after he gets off the nanny.
LOL! Good one!
Reply Quote
Artimus Gordon
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:17a, 10/4/24
I guess it's time for Jenn psaki to assume the position and succumb to the new masculinity of the Democratic Party.

The need to get Paul Pelosi in town to knock some sense into these wifebeaters
Reply Quote
1 edit
MaroonStain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Artimus Gordon • 8:48a, 10/4/24
Artimus Gordon said:
I guess it's time for Jenn psaki to assume the position and succumb to the new masculinity of the Democratic Party.

The need to get Paul Pelosi in town to knock some sense into these wifebeaters


Ol Paul would be too busy combing the streets for man love.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.