Lies about everything, no matter how big or small.
A cheap knock off of an already cheap person
Hoyt Ag said:Quo Vadis? said:
Update?????
Walz could have been the attack dog. He wasn’t. He did seize a moment on Trump’s lies about the 2020 election that will resonate with the Democratic base and likely with swing voters. Vance had a chance to tell the truth about 2020 but he knew the audience of one was watching.
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 2, 2024
Quo Vadis? said:Hoyt Ag said:Quo Vadis? said:
Update?????
Update?
fifyMuy said:GoAgs11 said:Dan Scott said:Here's my honest take. Vance was coming off as reasonable and even likable until he refused to admit that Trump lost the 2020 election. That undermined his whole night.
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) October 2, 2024
Thanks i was wondering what Ro Khanna was thinking
He sure has a crazylazymethod of deciding what's best for America.
Yeppolicywonk98 said:
DailyWire is doing its own discussion of debate. I'm with Shapiro on this. Vance killed Walz in this debate, but what he didn't do is paint Walz and Kamala as the radicals they are. It will be interesting to see if that matters.
The Counterpoint to Shapiro was Boreing who said that Vance would have gained nothing if he attack dogged his way through this debate. He came across as empathetic, smart, and willing to lead changes on things that people care about. He believes that Vance was talking directly to the people that are on the fence about Trump and tonight Vance gave them a reason to trust Trump/Vance.
I agree on both these points.
Neither of them are saying it moves the needle. But to the extent any needles would move, Vance employed the right tactic.
Dan Scott said:
They are running with thisWalz could have been the attack dog. He wasn’t. He did seize a moment on Trump’s lies about the 2020 election that will resonate with the Democratic base and likely with swing voters. Vance had a chance to tell the truth about 2020 but he knew the audience of one was watching.
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 2, 2024
double aught said:
Shoot. Give me a Vance/Walz ticket over either of the presidential candidates.
🚨 The NY Times declares Vance's performance "Dominant" pic.twitter.com/qvT1sjnDLe
— David D. Chapman (@davidchapman141) October 2, 2024
Final focus group vote tonight after the #VPDebate: 12-2 in favor of JD Vance pic.twitter.com/LgahO2za7C
— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) October 2, 2024
BREAKING: CNN admits Tim Walz lost the debate pic.twitter.com/VrHrNzrNKT
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) October 2, 2024
🚨ABC News reporter Linsey Davis compares Tim Walz's debate performance to Joe Biden's debate performance🚨
— Red Lion Politics (@lion_politics) October 2, 2024
— Red Lion Politics (@lion_politics) October 2, 2024
BREAKING: Even Chris Cuomo is blasting the CBS moderators for trying to "fact-check" JD Vance
— George (@BehizyTweets) October 2, 2024
"And look, Vance WAS RIGHT. There's nuance to it... And you gotta let them have their speak because now you created a story where you're the problem."
Everyone sees through the bull. pic.twitter.com/NtYyH3nt7M
Tampa Bay News 👇 pic.twitter.com/VXzvBa2KT1
— Red Lion Politics (@lion_politics) October 2, 2024
rsf0626 said:
Declaring who won the debate is pointless. People are only going to hear what they want to hear
JWinTX said:rsf0626 said:
Declaring who won the debate is pointless. People are only going to hear what they want to hear
Who are you voting for?
Newsflash.Dan Scott said:
They are running with thisWalz could have been the attack dog. He wasn’t. He did seize a moment on Trump’s lies about the 2020 election that will resonate with the Democratic base and likely with swing voters. Vance had a chance to tell the truth about 2020 but he knew the audience of one was watching.
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 2, 2024
rsf0626 said:JWinTX said:rsf0626 said:
Declaring who won the debate is pointless. People are only going to hear what they want to hear
Who are you voting for?
Doesnt matter. I'm just bringing up the very true fact that people have selective hearing
Trump just posted this on Truth 😂 pic.twitter.com/EoZbVieCYn
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) October 2, 2024
AND IT MEANS NOTHING EXCEPT TO TRUMP HATING LEFTIST AND CONCERNED MODERATES LIKE YOU!!!Dan Scott said:
They are running with thisWalz could have been the attack dog. He wasn’t. He did seize a moment on Trump’s lies about the 2020 election that will resonate with the Democratic base and likely with swing voters. Vance had a chance to tell the truth about 2020 but he knew the audience of one was watching.
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 2, 2024
Agreed, just watched a replay provided after my post that showed otherwise. In real time I thought it was Walz trying to cut in.Who?mikejones! said:
You're not right. They muted once, to cut off vance
Walz - “Crossings are down compared to when Donald Trump left office.”
— Chad Wolf (@ChadFWolf) October 2, 2024
Hmmm. CBP data shows the complete opposite ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/Jf2A3mFsNx
And announced by the mods.Cargo Shorts FTW said:Agreed, just watched a replay provided after my post that showed otherwise. In real time I thought it was Walz trying to cut in.Who?mikejones! said:
You're not right. They muted once, to cut off vance
And THAT is why they ended the debate with that question...Dan Scott said:
They are running with thisWalz could have been the attack dog. He wasn’t. He did seize a moment on Trump’s lies about the 2020 election that will resonate with the Democratic base and likely with swing voters. Vance had a chance to tell the truth about 2020 but he knew the audience of one was watching.
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 2, 2024
Barnyard96 said:
Missed the debate.
Did Walz win?
It went that bad huh pic.twitter.com/rUArTyNDgK
— DeepBunk (@Deepbunk) October 2, 2024
The longshoremen strike may drive this point home.Who?mikejones! said:
The Dems have convinced themselves that Jan 6th will determine this election. Npr said the same thing as Acosta. The reality is only the Dems care, along with a few squishy righties.
The grocery store will determine this election