I'm one of the few gringos reading this that has been to Culiacan Sinaloa (I feel relatively confident saying that usually regardless of company). During COVID when Mexico was open, many trips between Cancun, PV and Cabo. I've spent probably 8-10 nights at Distrito Cinco restaurant in PV (the same Distrito Cinco where the former governor of Jalisco was killed mere weeks after I was there). I usually opt to go outside the tourist area when I'm in any foreign town. I've been to Medellin multiple times and own property there (imho mexico is def more dangerous). I can legit say that I 'felt' more nervous/anxious/unsafe in NOLA or NYC.Bayou City said:
Maybe of you don't speak Spanish. I speak Spanish and grew up speaking Spanish so I don't let it bother me.
Mexico right now is much safer than Colombia. I guess it's about how you blend in and how much you stick out.
However, to act like Mexico is not completely lawless or it is not a legitimate concern/opinion to not travel to Mexico is, imho, a bit missing the reality on the ground there. We can say 'its no more dangerous than the south-side of chicago' but that is one area in one state. the ENTIRE country of Mexico is generally like that. it could almost be exactly reversed - in America, there are places to not go at certain times; in Mexico, there are a few places that you CAN go to. And even those places are still run by the cartels. Look at what you even describe - no taxis, don't do this/dress this way, etc. etc. Even on the south-side of chicago, I'd feel comfortable approaching a cop for assistance. The same absolutely cannot be said for Mexico. There are no doubt some small towns that are 'safe.' And I will say it is very sad for the people of Mexico. But it is generally lawless. the cartels run that country. A country run by the cartels is not 'safe,' except and unless the cartels want it to be safe for that person.