Mark Robinson

9,814 Views | 99 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Jack Boyette
Correction
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

If he was watching online porn who cares? It has to be something really freaky and bad.
Guessing you didn't read the actual story or wade through the whole thread.

Watching porn is not a scandal.

Now substitute "watching porn" for "posting frequently on a hardcore porn message board, calling yourself a Black Nazi, talking about wishing you could join the Klan and own slaves, and writing extremely detailed graphic fantasies about sodomizing and urinating on your wife's sister."
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this the guy who called himself a "Black Nazi?" Because if it is, two names come to mind.

The first, Inigo Montoya.

The second, Clayton Bigsby.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If he did all those things...it seems rather unimportant. Like something most dems do in their private lives.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Correction said:

Muy said:

If he was watching online porn who cares? It has to be something really freaky and bad.
Guessing you didn't read the actual story or wade through the whole thread.

Watching porn is not a scandal.

Now substitute "watching porn" for "posting frequently on a hardcore porn message board, calling yourself a Black Nazi, talking about wishing you could join the Klan and own slaves, and writing extremely detailed graphic fantasies about sodomizing and urinating on your wife's sister."
So he is now a crossover vote for liberals...I imagine...
Rex Racer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is Mark Robinson this guy?

oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
yes. that speech went viral years ago and help lead to his rise to Lt. Gov
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Correction said:

Muy said:

If he was watching online porn who cares? It has to be something really freaky and bad.
Guessing you didn't read the actual story or wade through the whole thread.

Watching porn is not a scandal.

Now substitute "watching porn" for "posting frequently on a hardcore porn message board, calling yourself a Black Nazi, talking about wishing you could join the Klan and own slaves, and writing extremely detailed graphic fantasies about sodomizing and urinating on your wife's sister."


I mean, what firebrand religious conservative hasn't spent time posting to porn message boards about their love for some t-girl action…..

This guy is literally so vile that it's hard to make jokes about it that are appropriate even for adult audiences. If republicans were ever going to find a line in the sand you would think this might be an easy one.
Rex Racer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

yes. that speech went viral years ago and help lead to his rise to Lt. Gov
That's who I thought it was. Thanks.
Correction
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Correction said:

Muy said:

If he was watching online porn who cares? It has to be something really freaky and bad.
Guessing you didn't read the actual story or wade through the whole thread.

Watching porn is not a scandal.

Now substitute "watching porn" for "posting frequently on a hardcore porn message board, calling yourself a Black Nazi, talking about wishing you could join the Klan and own slaves, and writing extremely detailed graphic fantasies about sodomizing and urinating on your wife's sister."
Forgot to add the part about virulently hating MLK and suggesting he should be referred to as Martin Lucifer Koon instead.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WestAustinAg said:

If he did all those things...it seems rather unimportant. Like something most dems do in their private lives.

this might be a controversial opinion but i don't think most dems are writing slaveowner and pee fetish fan fiction about their sisters-in-law on porn forums
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

WestAustinAg said:

If he did all those things...it seems rather unimportant. Like something most dems do in their private lives.

this might be a controversial opinion but i don't think most dems are writing slaveowner and pee fetish fan fiction about their sisters-in-law on porn forums
yeah; probably need to change it to brother-in-law
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

WestAustinAg said:

If he did all those things...it seems rather unimportant. Like something most dems do in their private lives.

this might be a controversial opinion but i don't think most dems are writing slaveowner and pee fetish fan fiction about their sisters-in-law on porn forums


It actually might be a bit more controversial than you thought.

https://www.advocate.com/politics/capitol-hill-second-gay-sex

A Senate staffer made headlines earlier this week after a leaked video showed him engaging in sexual acts with another man inside a Senate building. As it turns out, he wasn't the first.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gotta love ABC. They are running with this story, prefaced by "we cannot independently verify this but…"

So they attempted to fact check it, failed and said it anyway.

There was a time when no journalist would ever get a story published if it was not independently verified. Editors wouldn't allow it.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mathguy64 said:

Gotta love ABC. They are running with this story, prefaced by "we cannot independently verify this but…"

So they attempted to fact check it, failed and said it anyway.

There was a time when no journalist would ever get a story published if it was not independently verified. Editors wouldn't allow it.
It is how the media operates.

Media outlet X runs a story, then all the others run a story that simply reports what X's story is about.

It is how they "verified" the Russia collusion hoax.

And for the record, I have no idea if this guy did what CNN claims or not. However, he is another bad candidate even before this came out that Trump/MAGA selected in the primary to be the designated loser in a race that the Republican should have easily won.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Harris going to the airwaves to attack Trump via Robinson.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WestAustinAg said:

If he did all those things...it seems rather unimportant. Like something most dems do in their private lives.



So you support what Dems do?
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, the real question is obviously whether he did this or not. And with technology being the way it is, it's almost impossible to truly know. He says its not him. CNN is saying it is. I guess it all depends on who you trust and if you believe a guy like this would've spouted this stuff out on an adult website chat.

If it's true, he deserves to lose, similar to that woman doctor who was doing porn for campaign dollars in Virginia. But if it's not, if CNN is getting used again, just like Harry Reid did to them and the MSM with the cries about Romney not paying taxes, which was completely false, their answer is always, "did he win or lose?'. IOW, nothing matters but winning, not lying, not cheating, not murder attempts.

Again, I don't know this guy from Adam. But he seems like a very likeable guy, who obviously made it to being Lt. Governor in NC on his record and persona. If this isn't true, which I have no idea on if it is or not, as I don't rust any MSM outlet at all, but it just exacerbates the issue of decent people just looking at politics and saying, "No thanks--I'm not putting myself or my loved ones thru that", which is why we have dimwits like AOC, brother-marrying Ilhan Omar, and deadbeats like Eric Swalwell, who is in for Chinese girls, as much as he is for himself.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JWinTX said:

So, the real question is obviously whether he did this or not. And with technology being the way it is, it's almost impossible to truly know. He says its not him. CNN is saying it is. I guess it all depends on who you trust and if you believe a guy like this would've spouted this stuff out on an adult website chat.

If it's true, he deserves to lose, similar to that woman doctor who was doing porn for campaign dollars in Virginia. But if it's not, if CNN is getting used again, just like Harry Reid did to them and the MSM with the cries about Romney not paying taxes, which was completely false, their answer is always, "did he win or lose?'. IOW, nothing matters but winning, not lying, not cheating, not murder attempts.

Again, I don't know this guy from Adam. But he seems like a very likeable guy, who obviously made it to being Lt. Governor in NC on his record and persona. If this isn't true, which I have no idea on if it is or not, as I don't rust any MSM outlet at all, but it just exacerbates the issue of decent people just looking at politics and saying, "No thanks--I'm not putting myself or my loved ones thru that", which is why we have dimwits like AOC, brother-marrying Ilhan Omar, and deadbeats like Eric Swalwell, who is in for Chinese girls, as much as he is for himself.
That video of him ranting to Greensboro city council about guns is his record, his sole political accomplishment that he rode all the way to the lt. gov office. He's just a blowhard, which makes him popular with the MAGA GOP base.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bad news about him coming out before the election should end this guy, right?

if only some bad news, like proof of his obvious public corruption, had come out about Biden before the last election.

oh wait, this is (d)ifferent, isn't it?
Robert C. Christian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WestAustinAg said:

Old McDonald said:

WestAustinAg said:

If he did all those things...it seems rather unimportant. Like something most dems do in their private lives.

this might be a controversial opinion but i don't think most dems are writing slaveowner and pee fetish fan fiction about their sisters-in-law on porn forums


It actually might be a bit more controversial than you thought.

https://www.advocate.com/politics/capitol-hill-second-gay-sex

A Senate staffer made headlines earlier this week after a leaked video showed him engaging in sexual acts with another man inside a Senate building. As it turns out, he wasn't the first.
And the staffer was let go within days of it happening. Maybe a good precedence to follow?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-staffer-alleged-conservative-outlets-sex-hearing-room-rcna130095
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

JWinTX said:

So, the real question is obviously whether he did this or not. And with technology being the way it is, it's almost impossible to truly know. He says its not him. CNN is saying it is. I guess it all depends on who you trust and if you believe a guy like this would've spouted this stuff out on an adult website chat.

If it's true, he deserves to lose, similar to that woman doctor who was doing porn for campaign dollars in Virginia. But if it's not, if CNN is getting used again, just like Harry Reid did to them and the MSM with the cries about Romney not paying taxes, which was completely false, their answer is always, "did he win or lose?'. IOW, nothing matters but winning, not lying, not cheating, not murder attempts.

Again, I don't know this guy from Adam. But he seems like a very likeable guy, who obviously made it to being Lt. Governor in NC on his record and persona. If this isn't true, which I have no idea on if it is or not, as I don't rust any MSM outlet at all, but it just exacerbates the issue of decent people just looking at politics and saying, "No thanks--I'm not putting myself or my loved ones thru that", which is why we have dimwits like AOC, brother-marrying Ilhan Omar, and deadbeats like Eric Swalwell, who is in for Chinese girls, as much as he is for himself.
That video of him ranting to Greensboro city council about guns is his record, his sole political accomplishment that he rode all the way to the lt. gov office. He's just a blowhard, which makes him popular with the MAGA GOP base.
I'll believe you; I know nothing about him or his record. But I truly think if this is false, it's just another reason to never even look at anything a MSM outlet reports. If its true, all is deserved for what happens from it, as his people should've known this would get out since its so old. And that's exactly why I have a hard time believing it in its entirety--its almost too much to believe at one time, like the Jussie Smollett accusation.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRM said:

Harris going to the airwaves to attack Trump via Robinson.

No surprise. They likely knew about this for sometime, and it was all planned to be released when they thought it could cause maximum harm.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

TRM said:

Harris going to the airwaves to attack Trump via Robinson.

No surprise. They likely knew about this for sometime, and it was all planned to be released when they thought it could cause maximum harm.
Largely the same commercial Stein has been running against Robinson for some time, recycled to tie him close to Trump:

DanielDay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JWinTX said:

So, the real question is obviously whether he did this or not. And with technology being the way it is, it's almost impossible to truly know. He says its not him. CNN is saying it is. I guess it all depends on who you trust and if you believe a guy like this would've spouted this stuff out on an adult website chat.

If it's true, he deserves to lose, similar to that woman doctor who was doing porn for campaign dollars in Virginia. But if it's not, if CNN is getting used again, just like Harry Reid did to them and the MSM with the cries about Romney not paying taxes, which was completely false, their answer is always, "did he win or lose?'. IOW, nothing matters but winning, not lying, not cheating, not murder attempts.

Again, I don't know this guy from Adam. But he seems like a very likeable guy, who obviously made it to being Lt. Governor in NC on his record and persona. If this isn't true, which I have no idea on if it is or not, as I don't rust any MSM outlet at all, but it just exacerbates the issue of decent people just looking at politics and saying, "No thanks--I'm not putting myself or my loved ones thru that", which is why we have dimwits like AOC, brother-marrying Ilhan Omar, and deadbeats like Eric Swalwell, who is in for Chinese girls, as much as he is for himself.
Technology being the way it is? What are you talking about? You think CNN is going to risk the existence of their own company to go after a NC governor candidate who was losing before this story?
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Muy said:

If he was watching online porn who cares? It has to be something really freaky and bad.
Making America Great Again with people like that leading us? So much for bringing Christianity back. And it sounds like it was freaky and bad. Dude mentioned ******'s.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red Red Wine said:

Dude - if a person has a D or an R by their name. They are 99% corrupt and probably not a very good person.

Politics has devolved into a game of "who is worse than this person" when it comes to picking someone.

Both sides need to be removed and start over with NO MEDIA coverage allowed. Candidates have to run in their voting precincts door to door, town halls, grass roots, etc

Maybe that will start to clean out some of the garbage.
Well I guess to quote the late Burgess Meredith, "you can wish in one hand and crap in the other...See which one fills up first". I guess folks are cool with trying to make America great again by overlooking the immorality of elected officials. Sounds like the answer is just 'meh'. If so, then I don't want those folks using their faith and certainly not our Lords name in their elections. Just sad our only options for nominees have less moral discipline than probably many of those voting for them.

BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

Gotta love ABC. They are running with this story, prefaced by "we cannot independently verify this but…"

So they attempted to fact check it, failed and said it anyway.

There was a time when no journalist would ever get a story published if it was not independently verified. Editors wouldn't allow it.
Actually, it was fact checked by the sources that broke it. The guy wrote his full name and used an email address that he continued to use up until he got into politics. People can choose to believe it or not but I know if it was Dem, I'd believe it in heart beat. I just hold my side to the same standards.
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanielDay said:

JWinTX said:

So, the real question is obviously whether he did this or not. And with technology being the way it is, it's almost impossible to truly know. He says its not him. CNN is saying it is. I guess it all depends on who you trust and if you believe a guy like this would've spouted this stuff out on an adult website chat.

If it's true, he deserves to lose, similar to that woman doctor who was doing porn for campaign dollars in Virginia. But if it's not, if CNN is getting used again, just like Harry Reid did to them and the MSM with the cries about Romney not paying taxes, which was completely false, their answer is always, "did he win or lose?'. IOW, nothing matters but winning, not lying, not cheating, not murder attempts.

Again, I don't know this guy from Adam. But he seems like a very likeable guy, who obviously made it to being Lt. Governor in NC on his record and persona. If this isn't true, which I have no idea on if it is or not, as I don't rust any MSM outlet at all, but it just exacerbates the issue of decent people just looking at politics and saying, "No thanks--I'm not putting myself or my loved ones thru that", which is why we have dimwits like AOC, brother-marrying Ilhan Omar, and deadbeats like Eric Swalwell, who is in for Chinese girls, as much as he is for himself.
Technology being the way it is? What are you talking about? You think CNN is going to risk the existence of their own company to go after a NC governor candidate who was losing before this story?

These MSM outlets have one dutyprotect and preserve the Democrat Party. Dan Rather and CBS did it with a lot less technology in 2004. We have several mods that have looked like DNC operatives for debates.

So, yeah, I think CNN is trash. And judging by their abysmal ratings, so does most of America.
Deputy Travis Junior
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Red Red Wine said:

Dude - if a person has a D or an R by their name. They are 99% corrupt and probably not a very good person.

Politics has devolved into a game of "who is worse than this person" when it comes to picking someone.

Both sides need to be removed and start over with NO MEDIA coverage allowed. Candidates have to run in their voting precincts door to door, town halls, grass roots, etc

Maybe that will start to clean out some of the garbage.


Campaigning has become so unbelievably toxic that no normal person would put his/her family through it these days, which, with a few exceptions, leaves us to choose from a bunch of sociopaths who don't care about anything but themselves.

I would never run for anything beyond city council at this point. If I ran for an important office, some democrat diehard would buy my AOL Instant Messenger history from 25+ years ago, find one instance of 10-year-old me quoting a rap song to a friend, and then picketers would show up at my kids' school to get in their faces and scream that I'm a racist until they cry.

It's that unhinged. Nobody in their right mind would run for office anymore. As soon as you announce, the opposition sets out to ruin your life.
Jack Boyette
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

JWinTX said:

So, the real question is obviously whether he did this or not. And with technology being the way it is, it's almost impossible to truly know. He says its not him. CNN is saying it is. I guess it all depends on who you trust and if you believe a guy like this would've spouted this stuff out on an adult website chat.

If it's true, he deserves to lose, similar to that woman doctor who was doing porn for campaign dollars in Virginia. But if it's not, if CNN is getting used again, just like Harry Reid did to them and the MSM with the cries about Romney not paying taxes, which was completely false, their answer is always, "did he win or lose?'. IOW, nothing matters but winning, not lying, not cheating, not murder attempts.

Again, I don't know this guy from Adam. But he seems like a very likeable guy, who obviously made it to being Lt. Governor in NC on his record and persona. If this isn't true, which I have no idea on if it is or not, as I don't rust any MSM outlet at all, but it just exacerbates the issue of decent people just looking at politics and saying, "No thanks--I'm not putting myself or my loved ones thru that", which is why we have dimwits like AOC, brother-marrying Ilhan Omar, and deadbeats like Eric Swalwell, who is in for Chinese girls, as much as he is for himself.
That video of him ranting to Greensboro city council about guns is his record, his sole political accomplishment that he rode all the way to the lt. gov office. He's just a blowhard, which makes him popular with the MAGA GOP base.


A blowhard like telling minorities for decades you care about them, when in reality, you're just using them for votes?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.