Oh…. I joined the military 2 months after the attacks, and left that August. Yes, I was tricked.
Yeah, that early incarnation of the web pretty much slowed to a crawl that day. I think CNN resorted to posting information in a plain format resembling a 1980s BBS just to preserve bandwidth.Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
So I tried to get onto CNN.com for the news (first "news" site that occurred to me). I couldn't get on. My browser tab just sat there with one of those circles running, which was because that server was overloaded with requests. I then opened another browser tab and went to the only other "news" site that I could think of, chron.com for the Houston Chronicle. That one popped right up.
C@LAg said:
That was back when CNN was awesome.
Wall-to-wall coverage for days.
My ass was on the couch most waking moments for several days
CDUB98 said:
Sadly, the type of fireproofing they used played a role.
According to one engineering show I watched, they used a type of blown fiberglass, kind of like that loose stuff in our attics that they just blow in.
When the planes hit, the rush of air with them blew that proofing off of the girders in places, exposing the steel directly to the fire.
If they had used the more expensive cementatious proofing, it would have mostly stayed and the towers likely not have fallen.
Muy said:
Driving to work in Las Colinas, listening to The Ticket that stopped to air the news of the first plane. Then damn near pulled over in shock when they screamed the 2nd tower was hit.
Got to the office and we watched the news in a board room. Since we were near DFW we were asked to leave the office and go home.
Our 2nd son was born 6 days earlier and when I got home my wife said we needed to take him to the ER. He has thick yellow tears show up that day from jaundice, so we spent the next couple of days by him at the hospital. It was actually a complete distraction for us.