This is probably the best conversation with a politician I've heard. Good questions and actual answers from JD Vance even on the harder questions. I was meh on JD Vance as a VP candidate but no more.
He needs to stack Walz during their debate. You could give Walz the questions beforehand and Vance would still win the debate.William Foster said:
He just stacks bodies.
He's a great communicator!mslags97 said:
He has really grown on me as well…. I wasn't thrilled with him being the choice initially, but I am liking it more and more the more I hear things like this.
Dan Scott said:
This is probably the best conversation with a politician I've heard. Good questions and actual answers from JD Vance even on the harder questions. I was meh on JD Vance as a VP candidate but no more.
From my observations of Walz, that should not be that hard. Walz is not very good at deflections, choosing poor grammar as the only reason for his misrepresenting his NG service since 2005 dozens and dozens of times?AJCB said:He needs to stack Walz during their debate. You could give Walz the questions beforehand and Vance would still win the debate.William Foster said:
He just stacks bodies.
Absolutely agree. I have been a fan of his since I first heard him speak. I might not agree with him on everything, but there is no doubt he knows the issues and he can use facts (not bluster, insults and hyperbole) to make his point. He answers directly when it is appropriate, or he rejects the premise of the question if it is inappropriate. I would hate to be a Leftist reporter interviewing him.William Foster said:
Gotten through most of it and am VERY impressed. By far the brightest person in the running and is so good at navigating his way through tough "gotcha" questions and then flipping the script on that person and dominating them, but somehow doing so respectfully, with a smile on his face.
He just stacks bodies.