It has been over a month and it seems that everything we know today surfaced in the first few days after the shooting. How is it that there has not been any new release of information or confirmation of his activities or motives related to the assassination attempt? Anyone else feel the same way?

This is a non issue now and not important enough for any news cycle today. He didn't complete his mission. Anyear from now, most people will even know his name. Welcome to the 2024 society. May the odds be ever in your favor.

Government can't uncover themselves...

It's like Dan Bongino said - If you want to do everything possible to create a feeling of a conspiracy regarding an assassination attempt, this is how you would do it.

News started spreading that he was a bleeding heart liberal. Like Vegas, Nashville, Pulse, etc.

If liberals were serious about banning guns, they should ban themselves from owning them first and let us see if that fixes the problem. If it does, we'll leave it at that.

There's an argument to be made that people on hormone replacement therapy/SSRI prescriptions should actually not have a right to bear arms. Basically, mental illness is not a safe condition to walk around with a gun among us. People who don't accept the gender God created them as, for sure are crazy.

However, in practical terms, it's pretty dangerous to ever infringe on the 2nd amendment because we know the communists would only expand on it.

nortex97 said:

---

There's an argument to be made that people on hormone replacement therapy/SSRI prescriptions should actually not have a right to bear arms. Basically, mental illness is not a safe condition to walk around with a gun among us. People who don't accept the gender God created them as, for sure are crazy.

However, in practical terms, it's pretty dangerous to ever infringe on the 2nd amendment because we know the communists would only expand on it.

---

Truth….the 2A has been infringed upon enough

AgResearch said:

---

Government can't uncover themselves...

---

Combine this with Zuckerberg admitting working with the government to censor information regarding Hunters laptop. It's not a conspiracy theory, it's grounds for a huge investigation. The fact there isn't one ? You do the math.

Hoyt Ag said:

---

This is a non issue now and not important enough for any news cycle today. He didn't complete his mission. Anyear from now, most people will even know his name. Welcome to the 2024 society. May the odds be ever in your favor.

---

TBH, I had to open this thread to even see who Thomas Crooks was.

So yeah, we went from assassination attempt, to government incompetence, to Trump faked it himself, to nothing at all in just a month and a half.

atmtws said:

---

If liberals were serious about banning guns, they should ban themselves from owning them first and let us see if that fixes the problem. If it does, we'll leave it at that.

---

I cannot possibly upvote this enough

The Feds have been very busy covering their tracks since the shooting, including silencing people.

The same DEI hires that screwed things up and now investigating it.... What do you think would happen.

Hoyt Ag said:

---

This is a non issue now and not important enough for any news cycle today. He didn't complete his mission. Anyear from now, most people will even know his name. Welcome to the 2024 society. May the odds be ever in your favor.

---

I don't know about this one. Seems overblown. Crooks went to that range quite a lot. Even on holidays. Always by himself which is odd. But it appears the DHS signed in only once as "DHS" during that period, a day after Crooks. Seems more like coincidence.

Now if we knew some names of agents and could check for individual log ins and found a lot more visits by agents then there might be more to the story. But on the face of what is in the news, I'm chalking this up to coincidence.

American Hardwood said:

---

I don't know about this one. Seems overblown. Crooks went to that range quite a lot. Even on holidays. Always by himself which is odd. But it appears the DHS signed in only once as "DHS" during that period, a day after Crooks. Seems more like coincidence.

Now if we knew some names of agents and could check for individual log ins and found a lot more visits by agents then there might be more to the story. But on the face of what is in the news, I'm chalking this up to coincidence.

---

You are showcasing exactly what the problem is.... there is so little information about Crooks and the investigation being shared

"Why is there no further information about Thomas Crooks?" isn't the real question. The real question is, "why is there no further coverage of the assassination attempt at all?"

The answer to that question, which everyone here already knows, is that anything that could remotely help Trump and his campaign is suppressed.

Hoyt Ag said:

---

This is a non issue now and not important enough for any news cycle today. He didn't complete his mission. Anyear from now, most people will even know his name. Welcome to the 2024 society. May the odds be ever in your favor.

---

And people are STILL being prosecuted and imprisoned (for YEARS), because they stood on the steps of the Capitol with a MAGA hat on 4 years ago....

Dems and MSM:

"someone did something"....."at this point why does it even matter??"

but January 6...REEEEEEEEEE

Quote:

---

"Why is there no further information about Thomas Crooks?" isn't the real question. The real question is, "why is there no further coverage of the assassination attempt at all?"

The answer to that question, which everyone here already knows, is that anything that could remotely help Trump and his campaign is suppressed.

---

What I question about the story is why are Federal LEOs at the same range as Crooks. They have their own ranges and don't go where he would go. So was Crooks at a Fed range or the FBI at a public range, either makes me go, hmmm.

C@LAg said:

---

see: Las Vegas shooting.

---

Vegas shooting was totally different. Most likely involved a dispute between a jaded high stakes video poker player who lost it all, and the casino. Not revealing motive or other details that implicate the casino and expose them to an extreme amount of liability, is understandable. Like bankruptcy type liability that harms innocent investors who had nothing to do with the lunatic. That's exactly the outcome the shooter likely wanted....blame the casino who wronged him.

Is this certainly the case? No. Is it the most likely scenario given all the facts we know about the shooter and his casino dealings, Yes.

NO ONE had the Vegas shooter in their cross hairs before he fired. On the other hand, Crooks was captured aiming a gun at Trump in the sight picture of a SS sniper scope BEFORE he shot Trump. The rationale for why SS didn't pull trigger has yet to be explained.

BQ78 said:

---

What I question about the story is why are Federal LEOs at the same range as Crooks. They have their own ranges and don't go where he would go. So was Crooks at a Fed range or the FBI at a public range, either makes me go, hmmm.

---

From what I understand from the Paramount Tactical streams on this, because of required proficiency tests, most large gun ranges will see all kinds of law enforcement regularly. Particularly because this range has varied terrain and different shooting presentations and not just target practice.

At the same time the public is there?

BQ78 said:

---

At the same time the public is there?

---

Yes. Again according to Paramount Tactical and his wife. They travel to gun ranges (to conduct training sessions) all over the country and said it was quite usual to see various law enforcement personnel at every range.

American Hardwood said:

---

I don't know about this one. Seems overblown. Crooks went to that range quite a lot. Even on holidays. Always by himself which is odd. But it appears the DHS signed in only once as "DHS" during that period, a day after Crooks. Seems more like coincidence.

Now if we knew some names of agents and could check for individual log ins and found a lot more visits by agents then there might be more to the story. But on the face of what is in the news, I'm chalking this up to coincidence.

---

. Odd to go to a gun range by yourself?

Tex100 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

I don't know about this one. Seems overblown. Crooks went to that range quite a lot. Even on holidays. Always by himself which is odd. But it appears the DHS signed in only once as "DHS" during that period, a day after Crooks. Seems more like coincidence.

Now if we knew some names of agents and could check for individual log ins and found a lot more visits by agents then there might be more to the story. But on the face of what is in the news, I'm chalking this up to coincidence.

---

. Odd to go to a gun range by yourself?

---

When he didn't have many friends to pal around with, not surprising.

Bookmarked for reply later...

No

atmtws said:

---

News started spreading that he was a bleeding heart liberal. Like Vegas, Nashville, Pulse, etc.

If liberals were serious about banning guns, they should ban themselves from owning them first and let us see if that fixes the problem. If it does, we'll leave it at that.

---

Yep, Republicans should submit a bill that only registered voters can own guns. If you don't have Voter ID, then you can't ID gun owners either.