Gov. Gavin Newsom issues executive order for removal of homeless encampments in Calif

4,541 Views | 44 Replies | Last: 3 mo ago by Aggie97
GenericAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/25/us/gavin-newsom-executive-order-homeless-encampments/index.html

What a political hack! How is he going to reconcile this position with his prior positions? The homeless in CA are pissed, but it won't change anything in CA. They're all indoctrinated into the Borg.

Is he doing this to show Kamala that he's a viable choice?


California Gov. Gavin Newsom, buoyed by a recent US Supreme Court decision, issued an executive order Thursday calling on state officials to begin taking down homeless encampments.

The move to begin dismantling thousands of encampments throughout California comes after the high court ruled last month in favor of an Oregon city that ticketed homeless people for sleeping outside. The ruling rejected arguments that such "anti-camping" ordinances violated the Constitution's ban on "cruel and unusual" punishment.

"This executive order directs state agencies to move urgently to address dangerous encampments while supporting and assisting the individuals living in them and provides guidance for cities and counties to do the same," Newson said in a statement. "There are simply no more excuses. It's time for everyone to do their part."
heavens11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If only we had national elections every year the Democrat leadership might actual govern somewhat intelligently. Alas it's all very temporary window dressing to try and hide their insanity and convince people that the negative consequences they continually experience under far left governance isn't real
"It's just another corps trip boys, we'll march in behind the band"
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe the homeless will attack the governor, rise up in opposition, an insurrection of one homeless person pushing another homeless person in a shopping cart, right through any wall or barricade!!!
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A real tough guy!!
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That one time in 12 months you finally cleaned your room to make your Mom proud, cause you wanted the new Star Wars ATAT toy, when she flipped up your mattress and opened your closet to reveal that instead of solving the dirty room problem , you just re-homed all of your **** under the bed and in the closet.

If you would have had a libtard Democrat Mom, she would have rewarded you with the Presidency of the United States.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So the Chinese premier is visiting again?
Positive Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ANTIFA will surely be at Newsomes door protesting this evening.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So I assume they are calling him a racist now. Right?
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The court decision is cover.

There is nothing like an upcoming election to get a Democrat of their a** and start governing like a Republican that actually knows what they are doing.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And the order will be rescinded come November 6.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.
No, this is a preemptive move to step in as POTUS candidate if the DNC can't agree on Kamala.
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.
No, this is a preemptive move to step in as POTUS candidate if the DNC can't agree on Kamala.
This....or he knows it's going to take a bit of time, so he's cleaning up his room for a 2028 run.


This is what Cali residents should be PISSED about:

Quote:

In an executive order issued Thursday morning, the governor directs agencies to remove encampments that pose a risk to "life, health and safety."
...
The Newsom administration has invested $24 billion in recent years to try to shrink that number but it has only grown.
...
"This executive order directs state agencies to move urgently to address dangerous encampments while supporting and assisting the individuals living in them and provides guidance for cities and counties to do the same," Newsom said in a statement. "The state has been hard at work to address this crisis on our streets. There are simply no more excuses. It's time for everyone to do their part."
He finally does something now, after wasting over 24 BILLION dollars on homelessness, on his policies, that only made it worse.

Now he's saying it's 'urgent' and it's time for everyone to do their part?? After you've grifted BILLIONS from the State, turning a giant surplus into a much larger Deficit?...while making the problem much worse for your citizens??

I'd be livid if I lived there.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.

Nope.

They are both from California and could not get the electoral votes from that state, which would automatically kill their ability to win the general election.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.

Nope.

They are both from California and could not get the electoral votes from that state, which would automatically kill their ability to win the general election.
nope.

her current primary residence is US Naval Observatory.

there is no problem re: electors with her and Newsome.
Krombopulos Michael
How long do you want to ignore this user?


AlaskanAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
$24B didn't reduce the problem of homelessness, now this used car salesman thinks that removing encampment will somehow solve the issue? It's just playing musical chairs and shoving them in different directions.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thats not very liberal of Newsom. How dare he!
Homeless lives matter.
This deplorable nazi garbage voted for Trump.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GenericAggie said:



"This executive order directs state agencies to move urgently to address dangerous encampments while supporting and assisting the individuals living in them and provides guidance for cities and counties to do the same," Newson said in a statement. "There are simply no more excuses. It's time for everyone to do their part."



Oh look.. when his state is item 1 in evidence for what Harris would do to whole country, all of a sudden he is going to tackle a multi decade homeless problem.

These people are disgusting scum bags.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.

Nope.

They are both from California and could not get the electoral votes from that state, which would automatically kill their ability to win the general election.



I don't know why people continually get this wrong. The Presidential candidate gets the electors. If they are both from the same state the VP candidate does not. The VP is just along for the ride anyway. The President is up for election and that's all that matters
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
sharpdressedman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where will the homeless go? Can they disappear?
TheCurl84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sharpdressedman said:

Where will the homeless go? Can they disappear?
Look out Portland!!!!

Incoming Seattle!!!!
2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Homeless island

That would be a cool show, find a decent size island, buy it and dump a couple thousand homeless people there. And just video

Have hidden treasure maps that lead to drugs, water or a feral hog.

Can you imagine the drug addict when he sees a hog and not drugs? BBQ time

Kashchei
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Buncha bigots on here using the term "homeless." It's now "unhoused."
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How can they run 2 candidates from California
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kashchei said:

Buncha bigots on here using the term "homeless." It's now "unhoused."
And you're not a landlord, you're a "housing provider"
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course he does this now......He wants to be VP......
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

How can they run 2 candidates from California
her primary residence is not California.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_One_Observatory_Circle
Aggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

4 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.

Nope.

They are both from California and could not get the electoral votes from that state, which would automatically kill their ability to win the general election.
nope.

her current primary residence is US Naval Observatory.

there is no problem re: electors with her and Newsome.


Nope that is her temporary residence as VP. She still is a permanent resident of CA. She has a CA DL and is registered to vote in CA.
Cowboy Curtis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In Austin the City audits the homeless, gathers their personal information, and provides them a PO Box. Sounds like a ballot harvesting scheme to me. Between canvassing the 40 Acres and filling out ballots for bums Dems can sway local elections in their favor.

Mayor Adler and cronies once traveled to LA to learn how they deal with those experiencing homelessness. California may be shipping off bus loads to Red states to vote this upcoming election.

YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2023NCAggies said:

Homeless Manhattan island

That would be a cool show, find a decent size island, buy it and dump a couple thousand homeless people there. And just video

Have hidden treasure maps that lead to drugs, water or a feral hog.

Can you imagine the drug addict when he sees a hog and not drugs? BBQ time


nomad2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MarkTwain said:

4 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.

Nope.

They are both from California and could not get the electoral votes from that state, which would automatically kill their ability to win the general election.



I don't know why people continually get this wrong. The Presidential candidate gets the electors. If they are both from the same state the VP candidate does not. The VP is just along for the ride anyway. The President is up for election and that's all that matters


The 12th amendment disagrees. Electors vote for both president and vice president, and one of those must be from a different state as the elector.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie97 said:

C@LAg said:

4 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.

Nope.

They are both from California and could not get the electoral votes from that state, which would automatically kill their ability to win the general election.
nope.

her current primary residence is US Naval Observatory.

there is no problem re: electors with her and Newsome.


Nope that is her temporary residence as VP. She still is a permanent resident of CA. She has a CA DL and is registered to vote in CA.
then she can change her address of residence and register to vote in DC up to 21 days before the election.

this is not a problem for them.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nomad2007 said:

MarkTwain said:

4 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

Confirmed.

Sounds like we have our VP candidate for the Democrats.

Nope.

They are both from California and could not get the electoral votes from that state, which would automatically kill their ability to win the general election.



I don't know why people continually get this wrong. The Presidential candidate gets the electors. If they are both from the same state the VP candidate does not. The VP is just along for the ride anyway. The President is up for election and that's all that matters


The 12th amendment disagrees. Electors vote for both president and vice president, and one of those must be from a different state as the elector.



Sorry but you're incorrect. It simply states delegates can't vote for two people from the same state! Okay so what, Kamala gets the delegates for California and Newsome doesn't. The only requirement for the candidate for POTUS is the accumulate enough delegates to reach 270 that's it. There is constitutional requirement for the VP candidates however they are just along for the ride. If by chance the VP candidate falls short of 270 the Senate elects the Vice President from the two Vice Presidential candidates with the most electoral votes. Each Senator casts one vote for Vice President by a simple majority.


But NOTHING prevents the candidates of one party being from the same state.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's not cleaning his room to be VP.... He's cleaning his room so that when the Dems kick Kamala to the curb, he'll be the Presidential Candidate. Book it.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.