"Right to Vote"?

4,270 Views | 37 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Max Boredom
DOCAG79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can someone please explain to me why the Dems keep pushing the "right to vote" on their agenda? As far I know, if you are of legal age and a United States Citizen, you are eligible to vote! Am I wrong? They keep throwing that one out there with abortion and losing our democracy.

Is it about the inability to register? If so, if one is so incompetent/lazy to register, you should not vote in the first place. Still think all should show some form of ID at the very least.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They want no hindrances to stealing the election
flakrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ballot boxes on the Rio Grande
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They want to enable as much ballot harvesting as possible. It is really that simple.
rondis23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The intent is to get the 7 Plue Million they Ushered in without having to wait in line by claiming "Asylum", their children in the future, and their children's children to vote Blue.

That's why Kamala wants to provide ALL with Healthcare as well regardless if they are citizens.
It's pandering 101.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It is more than that. It is propaganda to convince the citizens that there is a threat to someone's right to vote. It is to help create bogeymen out of the opposition to their cheating designs. It's all a lie of course because all legal citizens have the right already, but the dems will never miss an opportunity to create division for their own gain.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because all they have is lying about what Republicans want to do.

In this case, they are claiming Republicans want to take away your right to vote, especially if you're not white.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Gigem_94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't forget the right to vote for dead people and locked up felons.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

They want to enable as much ballot harvesting as possible. It is really that simple.
Bingo. The more people they have registered, the larger the pool of votes to harvest.

Republicans better either figure out how to get these harvesting laws changed or get real good at ballot harvesting quickly, because the Democrats have been and currently are pedal to the metal with it.
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fear and division. Thats all democrats have. They spread the "right to vote" stuff to piss AA's into thinking this is the 1920s Mississippi. They spread their propaganda to piss off Hispanics, saying showing an ID is racist. (LOL, even though they show ID everywhere else)
Its all orchestrated words. That's all democrats have. Then when elected they dont know what the hell to do-- but, by God they have arrived!
No mention of our safety, taxes, inflation, violence in our cities-- just "fairness". issues. And LOL, they are worst at taking folks rights away.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This coming from the party that is running a candidate that absolutely no one had the opportunity to exercise their right to vote for.

You really can't make this shlt up
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The idea that the abortion ruling was a "threat to democracy" or asking for voter ID is a threat to the right to vote is absurd.

The abortion ruling was actually the very essence of our Constitutional Republic form of gov't in action: Trump won the 2016 election, appointed 3 SCOTUS judges during his term which was his right as defined by the Constitution, those judges were approved by Congress, and they issued a ruling based on the Constitutional principles of states rights. The very essence of our Constitutional Republic in action with all three separate but equal branches of gov't playing a role.

The outcome wasn't to the Dems liking so they want to gaslight Americans and tell lies that the Republicans are trying to take away women's right to "health care".
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

They want no hindrances to stealing the election
By rigging elections the Democrats steal my legitimate "right to vote". So back at you libs...
dustin999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The irony of it all is, the Democrats haven't held a legitimate presidential primary in 4 election cycles (Obama uncontested, Hillary superdelegates, Biden superdelegates, Kamala appointed), yet they somehow get the moniker of being the right to vote party?!?
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the right to vote is a brilliant marketing tactic by the left. the actual slogan was the "right to vote for anyone who hates America". but they took that last part out so when you look at it that way it makes alot of sense.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flakrat said:

Ballot boxes on the Rio Grande
…and Rikers Island
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They want the right to overthrow this country by illegally voting.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood said:

It is more than that. It is propaganda to convince the citizens that there is a threat to someone's right to vote. It is to help create bogeymen out of the opposition to their cheating designs. It's all a lie of course because all legal citizens have the right already, but the dems will never miss an opportunity to create division for their own gain.


There is a threat to our vote and it's from the democrats.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They always have a bit of trouble getting the Russian, Korean, and Iraqi votes in and counted. For some reason a bunch of people don't think those countries should vote in US elections.
CampSkunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The question is, why do Dems think that dead people have the right to vote but they don't give the vote to live people who suffer from the inconvenience of still be located within the womb?
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sure it's a right, but that right has its foundations in being 18 years old, a U.S. citizen, and a non-felon.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because taking the initiative to register and prove residency/ citizenship, especially more than thirty days before an election, is apparently just too difficult for some people.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the premise:

lib=liar /Titan


Once you approach everything a lib does or says with that premise, it all makes sense.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I heard that Trump wants to take away "all rights" from women, so I assume that includes the right to vote.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They always frame their agenda as something reasonable so that they can point to the big bad republicans for stupidly objecting to it.

Who would be against the right to vote? "Reeeee! Republicans are against it!".

This passes the very low bar smell test for Democrat voters who never read the fine print. Meanwhile the more educated voters who vote Republican know this is really more about letting illegals vote and relaxing voting standards from which they can make cheating easier.
olarmy96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ballot harvesting and even mail-in voting undermine the power of the secret ballot.

There's no such thing as a non-partisan ballot harvester. Do you really think they don't watch the ballot being filled out? Do ballots for the "other side" really make it to the ballot box?

How many husbands would decline this scenario? "Honey, I filled out your ballot for you. I just need you to sign it. I know you'd never support the other side, RIGHT?"

What about young adults living with their parents? "No one who supports THEM, will be living under this roof"! Do they really have a free choice with a mail-in ballot watched or filled-out by mom or dad?

Removing the secret ballot allows others to strong arm fellow voters into supporting their candidates, and that's wrong. It's also cheating, and no Aggie should support it.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Because all they have is lying about what Republicans want to do.

In this case, they are claiming Republicans want to take away your right to vote, especially if you're not white.
Very true, like always.

One of the MANY things the dems don't get is those minorities as a whole don't need saving, but you can tell the Dems can't find new ways to court those voters, so they go back to the same playbook of making it seem as if they're the ones who can "save" them. Minorities don't need to be saved, they need to be heard, and right now, especially when it comes to "it's the economy stupid," the right is leaps and bounds a better option for them, and it isn't even close.

The fact is, every citizen, POC or white AF, has the exact same rights, and has had them for over half a century.

It's this mindset that keeps pushing more and more POC away from them and into the GOP tent.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

They want to enable as much ballot harvesting as possible. It is really that simple.

EOT.

CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

Because taking the initiative to register and prove residency/ citizenship, especially more than thirty days before an election, is apparently just too difficult for some people.

Frankly, if you don't have that much interest and initiative…

You are likely uninformed and don't need to vote
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some of us have been banging on the drum that Amerika got its start in 2008, got derailed in 2016, and the Amerikan machine overran the democratic election process by using Covid to control the entire vote gathering/creation in certain states that were easy to take over.

When communists have to fight capitalism, it takes all forms of weaponry to defeat it. But communists don't have morons in charge, they have tyrants. IOW, think Obama, not Kamala. They need a person at the top who can motivate, inspire, scare, and intimidate. Again, that ain;t Kamala.

If she does get installed as the President, the world order will change ASAP. We will be a European/Canadian/Japanese type of country, but China and Russia will be the Super Powers and those European countries, Japan, Korea, Australia, and India are all going to be setup for an AXIS style takeover. And we won't be able to do one thing about it. We will just have to wait for it to end.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B-1 83 said:

Sure it's a right, but that right has its foundations in being 18 years old, a U.S. citizen, and a non-felon.
It has its foundations in being a taxpayer.

Not a "pay some taxes in and get 10x that value back through BS government programs", but an actual "pay taxes in" foundation.
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The right to vote (as embraced by Ds even if they don't say it all out loud*)-
Asylum seekers need it.
Convicted felons need it.
16 year olds need it.
Dominion voting machines need it.
No voter ID needed (because that is "racist").
Ballot harvesting is needed.
Should not be infringed by having independent or Republican oversight of vote counting.
Candidates you can vote for must pass evolving litmus test.
Can only be protected by D AGs and Secretary of States.

*List subject to change at any time D establishment deems helpful.
trailrunner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Basic fear tactics. Just like existential threat to democracy, their going to take away your "reproductive rights", project 2025, etc
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

American Hardwood said:

It is more than that. It is propaganda to convince the citizens that there is a threat to someone's right to vote. It is to help create bogeymen out of the opposition to their cheating designs. It's all a lie of course because all legal citizens have the right already, but the dems will never miss an opportunity to create division for their own gain.


There is a threat to our vote and it's from the democrats.
Well yes, of course. I assumed that it would be understood that I was talking about the left's playbook. This issue like just about everything else the left does. "Accuse others of what you do" is sadly so applicable on a daily basis that the phrase is becoming tired and worn out.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.