dvldog said:

---

ABattJudd said:

---

Is this being reported anywhere else? I'd love to see an actual network or other known news source run with this, especially in light of rumors that Joe's gone tits-up.

---

Tomorrow evening at 8 PM ET, I will address the nation from the Oval Office on what lies ahead, and how I will finish the job for the American people.

— President Biden (@POTUS) July 23, 2024

---

Cue Beavis and Butthead... "heh, heh, heh... he said 'Lies'... heh, heh, heh"

DogCo84 said:

---

And......the "adults in charge" get busted. I've been using ElevenLabs for narration on a YouTube channel. It's very good, but also has a tool to investigate possible AI generated audio. Something just did not sound right about Joe's phone call. There's no way Joe could even READ over 3 minutes of script all in one go.

From the post:

"BREAKING The Whitehouse Gets Caught Using Popular AI Voice Cloning Tool...To Fake Call To Vice PResident Kamala's HQ Event"

---

What their spiritual medium was not available?

real life Dave happening before our eyes.

crowman2010 said:

---

Raiderjay said:

---

Biden to address nation from Oval Office Wed per admin

---

What's the over/under on this actually happening?

---

I'll take over 2.5 for 1,000, Alex.

But Joe promised us transparency in his administration,. What a crock of bs.

25th and impeachment now

This should be 100% illegal because of it's deceptive nature.

dvldog said:

---

ABattJudd said:

---

Is this being reported anywhere else? I'd love to see an actual network or other known news source run with this, especially in light of rumors that Joe's gone tits-up.

---

Tomorrow evening at 8 PM ET, I will address the nation from the Oval Office on what lies ahead, and how I will finish the job for the American people.

— President Biden (@POTUS) July 23, 2024

---

I'm thinking Max Headroom.

edit - I see I wasn't the first.

Is the OP's post being reported on anywhere else?

Raiderjay said:

---

Biden to address nation from Oval Office Wed per admin

---

Will he hold up a newspaper?

Does anyone have 11 Labs? Can you reproduce this?

I think one of our saving graces will be .. Yes, those in charge are evil and are willing to do anything to keep power... but also they are in government, and therefore have a high level of incompetence.

Phatbob said:

---

I think one of our saving graces will be .. Yes, those in charge are evil and are willing to do anything to keep power... but also they are in government, and therefore have a high level of incompetence.

---

Beautifully said Phatbob

TexAgs91 said:

---

Does anyone have 11 Labs? Can you reproduce this?

---

Yeah. That video could be a lot better. I'd like to see this reproduced.

Marlin39m said:

---

Is the OP's post being reported on anywhere else?

---

This is s a bit like the A&M-Commerce professor who used ChatGPT to determine his students wrote their term papers using ChatGPT.

For some reason he still appears to have a job there.

Every time I say it can't get weirder I get proven wrong. I'm done with that . It's gonna get weirder.

Right now AI is good enough to fool at least half the people. That's all you need.

TexAgs91 said:

---

Raiderjay said:

---

Biden to address nation from Oval Office Wed per admin

---

---

That ST episode has been the first thing my mind has gone to during "his" whole administration. Biden has never been the president, he's just the face of it.

Biden doesn't even know he isn't running

The groundhog has emerged from his burrow

https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/kamala-harris-campaign-running-mate-pick-endorsements-biden

OK, I'm going to call myself out on this one. I'm coming to the conclusion that the X post is probably a fake (outing a fake). The devil, as they say, is in the details--and time will tell. Even if that X post was fake though, it doesn't RULE OUT the use of some other tool to create Biden's unlikely, non-stop, one-way, 3+ minute statement to campaign staff. Why not do it via Zoom with video and remove all (most?) doubt?

Ag87H2O said:

---

And the crap show continues.

Once again, Democrats are proving the fact that they are the real threat to Democracy.

---

Democrats are a far bigger threat to America than ISIS ever was as well as a far bigger threat to American than were the Nazis or the Japanese. Unfortunately, we don't have an ocean between them and us.

So they're just using Schwarzenegger soundboards from the 90's/2000's to make prank phone calls to the American people?

Enough with the conspiracy theories. Y'all are just making yourselves look foolish.
Biden's not dead (technically).

Is he old and frail and demented? Yes. But he's still alive.

There's no way they can cover up his death. Y'all have watched the movie Dave too many times.

if you scroll down to one of the first replies someone uploads the entire speech, not just a tiny sample, and that tool says 2% chance it was AI generated.

pic.twitter.com/dF74honbIL

— Ben Jiles (@BenSJiles) July 23, 2024

I don't know how this software works, but wouldn't the longer a clip be, the less likely it would say it is a match?

Also, could you run an audio clip through a filter to change it up slightly, not enough to hear much difference, but enough to throw off the match detection of the analytical software and make it report that it is unlikely to have been faked? Could the same be done in reverse to make it appear more likely to be faked?

Just questions. I am unfamiliar with the technology.

Ooh ooh good movie…. great cast! Frank Langella plays a fantastic henchman.

Hey libtarded idiots how much more do you need to see(or hear)?

geoag58 said:

---

Hey libtarded idiots how much more do you need to see(or hear)?

---

It was proven to be false with the full clip but you do you.

American Hardwood said:

---

I don't know how this software works, but wouldn't the longer a clip be, the less likely it would say it is a match?

---

No, it is likely the opposite. The longer the audio sample, the more accurately the model should be to predict if it is AI generated or not. It is similar to any other prediction made from data: generally, the more data one has, the more certainty one can have in any inferences produced from that data.

American Hardwood said:

---

Also, could you run an audio clip through a filter to change it up slightly, not enough to hear much difference, but enough to throw off the match detection of the analytical software and make it report that it is unlikely to have been faked? Could the same be done in reverse to make it appear more likely to be faked?

---

This is the link to ElevenLabs page on the AI Speech Classifier (https://elevenlabs.io/blog/ai-speech-classifier). They claim the following on the accuracy of their model:

Quote:

---

Audio generated by our models has certain detectable characteristics. When you upload an audio sample to the AI Speech Classifier, our algorithm will scan for them to assess whether the content was indeed generated by our platform, currently maintaining >99% accuracy if the input was unmodified. If it underwent Codec or reverb transformations, the Classifier is over 90% accurate. This figure drops the more the content has been post-processed. Adding more audio tracks will also affect the result.

---

The model is a proprietary black-box, and they provide no further information on their validation methods, so I would take the above statement with a huge grain of salt. Further, the tool only claims to estimate the probability that the speech is generated from their own speech generation model, so who knows how this model would perform for more general detection of AI generated speech. I think that the model produces two wildly different predictions from different lengths of the same clip also indicates the tool is probably not as reliable as they claim.