SS Director Cheadle resigning on Monday?

10,636 Views | 61 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Only a week late...

aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
aggiepanic95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The whole thing...including her...is PATHETIC.

Add: she should be prosecuted for dereliction of duty
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
She has no choice.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sharpshooter said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
She has no choice.


Understand. Let's see if she shows up.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Buck Turgidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As usual with lefties, the debate rages between incompetence or evil being the motivating factor behind their actions.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Sharpshooter said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
She has no choice.


Understand. Let's see if she shows up.
Agree. I hear jail has three full meals.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artorias said:

Only a week late...


is this being reported/rumored elsewhere?

I do not consider the Chair for TrumpStudents to be a likely source of breaking national policy.
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The right call. Hopefully this news is legit. Heads had to roll and she was the top head. That statement about why nobody was on that roof cause sloped was pretty dumb. Once she opened her mouth and said something like that, any initial benefit of the doubt for some reasonable explanation other than incompetence was flushed.
91Challenger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sharpshooter said:

aginlakeway said:

Sharpshooter said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
She has no choice.


Understand. Let's see if she shows up.
Agree. I hear jail has three full meals.


And the cells do not have a slope.
"A is A”
Cepe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Her and her cronies have been screwing around with security for both Trump and RFK Jr.

It's horrible and damn near got someone killed.

This should never be allowed to happen again.
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biden had such an easy layup to fire her
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How did she become head is security at Pepsi?
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
yup.
jhermon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cepe said:

Her and her cronies have been screwing around with security for both Trump and RFK Jr.

It's horrible and damn near got someone killed.

This should never be allowed to happen again.


They did get someone killed.
TA-OP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cepe said:

It's horrible and damn near got someone killed.
Someone did.
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
deddog said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
yup.

Seems like she would still have to testify, no?
suburban cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

How did she become head is security at Pepsi?


Obviously she was most qualified for the job
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anti-taxxer said:

deddog said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
yup.

Seems like she would still have to testify, no?
only if the DoJ is willing to pursue it. and with Biden's DoJ, that is not a guarantee. The DoJ has no obligation to prosecute for noncompliance
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

Anti-taxxer said:

deddog said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
yup.

Seems like she would still have to testify, no?
only if the DoJ is willing to pursue it. and with Biden's DoJ, that is not a guarantee.
Can't Congress subpoena her?
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artorias said:

C@LAg said:

Anti-taxxer said:

deddog said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
yup.

Seems like she would still have to testify, no?
only if the DoJ is willing to pursue it. and with Biden's DoJ, that is not a guarantee.
Can't Congress subpoena her?
Yes, they can. Does not mean she has to or will show up. I was jumping to the end game.

She can avoid a congressional summons. then it falls to DoJ to pursue it, and that is at their discretion.

Congress can also pursue a civil suit against her, but there is no criminal penalties for that.
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

How did she become head is security at Pepsi?


And she made $1.2 million annually at Pepsi doing that job. Reported net worth of $10 million+ after taking in that Pepsi salary for a few years so nobody should be concerned about her starving once unemployed.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anti-taxxer said:

deddog said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
yup.

Seems like she would still have to testify, no?
Can she plead the 5th and refuse to answer questions?
Oh I see above, she might not even show up.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She prioritized DEI hires, but didn't Mayorkas hire her? Seems like she's an easy fire, but the real target should be Mayorkas. How does he justify hiring her for that position?
Fight! Fight! Fight!
GasAg90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yawn. Another stellar agency within DHS.
Horn_in_Aggieland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She was previously a SS agent with 25+ years of experience.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DEI made her career die.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3476828
I think that, to be very honest with you, I do believe that we should have rightly believed, but we certainly believe that certain issues are just settled.

- Kamala Harris

Vote for Trump.
He took a bullet for America.

PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Evil person
austinag1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cepe said:

Her and her cronies have been screwing around with security for both Trump and RFK Jr.

It's horrible and damn near got someone killed.

This should never be allowed to happen again.


It did get someone killed.
austinag1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

Artorias said:

C@LAg said:

Anti-taxxer said:

deddog said:

aginlakeway said:

Yep. She doesn't want to testify.
yup.

Seems like she would still have to testify, no?
only if the DoJ is willing to pursue it. and with Biden's DoJ, that is not a guarantee.
Can't Congress subpoena her?
Yes, they can. Does not mean she has to or will show up. I was jumping to the end game.

She can avoid a congressional summons. then it falls to DoJ to pursue it, and that is at their discretion.

Congress can also pursue a civil suit against her, but there is no criminal penalties for that.


My understanding is they did subpeona her.
APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just like Mayorkas, why are people demanding her resignation?

Every one the Department heads are incompetent and should have never been given those posts to begin with.

From the Department of Transportation, to Education, to Homeland Security, and especially the Department of Defense.

Even when removing her, another incompetent shrill will be selected to take her place.

In other words, nothing is going to change.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
APHIS AG said:

Just like Mayorkas, why are people demanding her resignation?

Every one the Department heads are incompetent and should have never been given those posts to begin with.

From the Department of Transportation, to Education, to Homeland Security, and especially the Department of Defense.

Even when removing her, another incompetent shrill will be selected to take her place.

In other words, nothing is going to change.

One would think under the Lord willing soon to be here Trump Administration, someone more competent will be appointed.
I think that, to be very honest with you, I do believe that we should have rightly believed, but we certainly believe that certain issues are just settled.

- Kamala Harris

Vote for Trump.
He took a bullet for America.

Artimus Gordon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They are evil first and try to hide behind incompetence. Cross examination gets incompetence out of the way
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JDUB08AG said:

Biden had such an easy layup to fire her
1. When briefed about it for some direction, he looked into the empty space and stated he had never heard of her or the SS.
2. After explaining who she was and what she did, he continued to gaze into nothingness, with an open mouth.
Pretty sure most of you don’t know me.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Horn_in_Aggieland said:

She was previously a SS agent with 25+ years of experience.
And clearly not fit for her job.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.