Shots fired at Trump [Keep it factual -- Staff]

847,476 Views | 6497 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by gigemags-99
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The more Cheatle speaks, the worse this gets. She needs to be fired immediately, at minimum. I look forward to the investigation and her eventual downfall....
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Foreverconservative said:

agracer said:

Foreverconservative said:

P.U.T.U said:

Now there are videos of a SS agent crouching down beside the stage right before the shooting happened. Keeps getting weirder and weirder


Another female

You have no clue if that photo is before the shots were fired.

In fact, there is more than one person reacting to 'something' based on the folks in the stands in the background and the other guy in the suite (SS??) on the right side of the photo.



I know for a fact it was after the shots were fired you're the one that has no clue
I thought you were agreeing with the poster who said the SS was crouching down before the shots.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mods can you add a header to my thread with a warning like you did for the Ukraine thread to keep this thread populated with facts and actual updates and take the Qanon level conspiracy garbage to another thread
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
TheRealCoachO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RED AG 98 said:

The more Cheatle speaks, the worse this gets. She needs to be fired immediately, at minimum. I look forward to the investigation and her eventual downfall....



I don't think she will get fired. She probably knows too much.

The more that comes out, the more it looks like it wasn't incompetence…shooter was allowed to be there.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheRealCoachO said:

RED AG 98 said:

The more Cheatle speaks, the worse this gets. She needs to be fired immediately, at minimum. I look forward to the investigation and her eventual downfall....



I don't think she will get fired. She probably knows too much.

The more that comes out, the more it looks like it wasn't incompetence…shooter was allowed to be there.
She'll be fired in January. Then maybe the real investigation can start.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm going to guess this: nobody on the security detail thought that the shooter would climb the designated security headquarters post to take the shot. I imagine the thought of the possibility didn't cross their mind that the shooter would not know or care that the building had officers inside.
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RED AG 98 said:

The more Cheatle speaks, the worse this gets. She needs to be fired immediately, at minimum. I look forward to the investigation and her eventual downfall....
where has she spoken? Not random one off tweets "quoting" where is an actual interview please
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

A direct line of sight like that to the former president of the United States should not occur

DHS head Mayorkas seems to agree with what people saying on here.

But also, this is Exxon's Captain Hazelwood saying 'contact with our oil tanker to the rocks should not occur.'
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

I'm going to guess this: nobody on the security detail thought that the shooter would climb the designated security headquarters post to take the shot. I imagine the thought of the possibility didn't cross their mind that the shooter would not know or care that the building had officers inside.


They didn't take any measure to actually secure the roof. They didn't post people around the building or have someone at a post where they could observe the roof.

agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RED AG 98 said:

I guess you missed Ms. DEI's reasoning: too slopey. Taking a bullet for Prez, sure. Securing a position on a 1:12 roof, no way!!!!
Lest we forget, not only was it a slopey roof, it was a hot slopey roof. Perfect storm scenario...

/s
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agent-maroon said:

RED AG 98 said:

I guess you missed Ms. DEI's reasoning: too slopey. Taking a bullet for Prez, sure. Securing a position on a 1:12 roof, no way!!!!
Lest we forget, not only was it a slopey roof, it was a hot slopey roof. Perfect storm scenario...

/s


Not too hot or inclined for an assassin.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. I think they assumed because they were in it and in front of it, it would be the last place a shooter would go to. They were oblivious to the fact it was still accessible and unguarded on top.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lonestar_Ag09 said:

RED AG 98 said:

The more Cheatle speaks, the worse this gets. She needs to be fired immediately, at minimum. I look forward to the investigation and her eventual downfall....
where has she spoken? Not random one off tweets "quoting" where is an actual interview please


She's made two interviews. Both with ABC. None on FNC.

First interview she didn't want to comment about an ongoing investigation, so that was worthless

After that blew up in her face see had a second interview and shifted blame to local LEA and lame excuses for the lack of security and lapses in protocol

“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As a point of reference, if the slope of that roof is actually 1:12 then it is the exact same slope as an ADA compliant wheelchair ramp. But it's too dangerous.
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlackLab said:

One of the most ridiculous things I've heard is that this nerd took a clear shot at the president from the roof of the building that housed the LEO command center- like he was some kind of Jason Bourne.
Yet had a car full of explosives. Where did he get the explosives? How much explosives? What was in his house/room? I love the fact that all these questions plus the 30 minutes of no action are just there to be ignored. Any that asks is a certified loon that doesn't believe in Occam and his razor.
MsDoubleD81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reports that he bought a ladder before shooting.

https://kion546.com/news/national-world/cnn-national/2024/07/15/a-shooting-range-a-gun-store-and-a-ladder-purchase-tracking-the-trump-rally-gunmans-movements-leading-up-to-his-attack-3/
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

BlackLab said:

One of the most ridiculous things I've heard is that this nerd took a clear shot at the president from the roof of the building that housed the LEO command center- like he was some kind of Jason Bourne.
Yet had a car full of explosives. Where did he get the explosives? How much explosives? What was in his house/room? I love the fact that all these questions plus the 30 minutes of no action are just there to be ignored. Any that asks is a certified loon that doesn't believe in Occam and his razor.



The explosives were likely homemade, bomb making materials were confiscated from the parents home.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This thread has become silly. BUT its understandable. If we had a government and a media that was honest and truthful with the people, we could count on them for a full and accurate reports.

Well, we dont have an honest, accountable government. And we damn sure dont have an honest and accountable media.

So we speculate on and on as normal humans without the truth tend to do. And the theories get wilder and wilder with time as they tend to do.

Totally understandable.

F* Biden and F* the MSM.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Explosives? Fireworks? Tannerite? Gunpowder? A kid can make a simple bomb. I wouldn't put too much into that. Gives the shooter too much credit. It's frankly almost amazing the cops didn't catch him, but Hanlon's razor applies. Complacency, incompetence, inexperience with the locals, poor coordination, and maybe dumb rules for follow ups and engagement, and for delaying the event to investigate a threat.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I made the pitch up in my post. I have no idea what it really is so just used something very benign...
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lonestar_Ag09 said:

RED AG 98 said:

The more Cheatle speaks, the worse this gets. She needs to be fired immediately, at minimum. I look forward to the investigation and her eventual downfall....
where has she spoken? Not random one off tweets "quoting" where is an actual interview please
It was an interview with ABC, if that is sufficient.

outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MsDoubleD81 said:

Reports that he bought a ladder before shooting.

https://kion546.com/news/national-world/cnn-national/2024/07/15/a-shooting-range-a-gun-store-and-a-ladder-purchase-tracking-the-trump-rally-gunmans-movements-leading-up-to-his-attack-3/


Quote:

It's not clear whether Crooks used the ammunition or the ladder that he bought on Saturday during his attack later that day.

So much for the theory that he stashed it in advance of the shooting. Unless they left the whole site unsecured until just before the event, which would be worse.

The stench of this is rising up, not going away
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SeanAg05 said:

That SS ***** on the radio just said they didn't have somebody on that roof because it was sloped and they were worried about their safety… Are you freaking kidding me… The counter snipers were on a sloped roof


Doesn't look more than a 5/12 pitch. It actually looks closer to 3 or 4 on 12, aka, not steep
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like the shooter probably used google maps or similar to pre-survey the site, then checked it out on the ground and determined no ladder was needed and the line of sight was good and the security had a coverage gap.

He then left and got is weapon and returned.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I would agree, but never forget someone had to assemble this team and someone had to be in charge. Calling something a conspiracy sounds harsh and is likely incorrect. Setting things up to fail? Pretty obvious and it would be the best way to do it-if, of course, that was your goal...
Saw a former SS agent on TV this morning. She said that there is always a command center with the liasions for each agency involved in security. They are together in the same room and communicate via their distinct communications channels at all times. So if a local PD radioed in that a man had been spotted on that roof, the SS officer in commnd could immediately alert the sniper teams on which grid and zone to look while simultaneously confirming with the counterparts it was not a friendly up there.

That commander on scene is the person who knows what happened. I'd wager there is some type of recording as well.

Which makes it all the more curious about the story of the cop who did get up to the roof, whether by ladder or boosted by another officer, that there should have been radio contact before that saying they were going to take a look. Again, grids and zones. The entire site is mapped out and where security is stationed is mapped out. Those maps are in the command center so they could pinpoint which officers were where and which were responding to the reports of a man on the roof and where located.
I cant speak for the SS, but 27 years ago my lil rag tag unit kept a log book of all voice coms into and out of the TOC between infil and exfil+. All resupplys and STANO dumps were also recorded. Digital bursts recorded. I rarely worked the TOC but that information RECORDED is vital. Sometimes it was just us and one other LEA, other times it was us and 8+ LEAs local, state, fed, with a liaison from every significantly contributing entity in the TOC or at least a radio way to communicate with all.

In an event like this they would absolutely have both a Commander (HMFIC) and 1 or more COMS managers coordinating communications.

27 years ago we could pass out radios to everyone, INFIL them over the AIR, with Channel 1 ALL call, Channel 2 only us, Channel 3 only Air, Channel 4 a mix and on and on and on. The TOC always sounded like a drone(s) with all the battery chargers burring away for hours, days, weeks, and even months.

Beyond incompetent if this wasn't being done and with todays technology should be automatic and on a visual timeline providing a clear & concise who, what, where, when. just like 911 software does.

Will the public ever see it in this case only God knows.

RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So much slope. These folks really need to have been tethered for safety.

She needs to be fired. And then she needs to be prosecuted.

Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFABNRGR said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I would agree, but never forget someone had to assemble this team and someone had to be in charge. Calling something a conspiracy sounds harsh and is likely incorrect. Setting things up to fail? Pretty obvious and it would be the best way to do it-if, of course, that was your goal...
Saw a former SS agent on TV this morning. She said that there is always a command center with the liasions for each agency involved in security. They are together in the same room and communicate via their distinct communications channels at all times. So if a local PD radioed in that a man had been spotted on that roof, the SS officer in commnd could immediately alert the sniper teams on which grid and zone to look while simultaneously confirming with the counterparts it was not a friendly up there.

That commander on scene is the person who knows what happened. I'd wager there is some type of recording as well.

Which makes it all the more curious about the story of the cop who did get up to the roof, whether by ladder or boosted by another officer, that there should have been radio contact before that saying they were going to take a look. Again, grids and zones. The entire site is mapped out and where security is stationed is mapped out. Those maps are in the command center so they could pinpoint which officers were where and which were responding to the reports of a man on the roof and where located.
I cant speak for the SS, but 27 years ago my lil rag tag unit kept a log book of all voice coms into and out of the TOC between infil and exfil+. All resupplys and STANO dumps were also recorded. Digital bursts recorded. I rarely worked the TOC but that information RECORDED is vital. Sometimes it was just us and one other LEA, other times it was us and 8+ LEAs local, state, fed, with a liaison from every significantly contributing entity in the TOC or at least a radio way to communicate with all.

In an event like this they would absolutely have both a Commander (HMFIC) and 1 or more COMS managers coordinating communications.

27 years ago we could pass out radios to everyone, INFIL them over the AIR, with Channel 1 ALL call, Channel 2 only us, Channel 3 only Air, Channel 4 a mix and on and on and on. The TOC always sounded like a drone(s) with all the battery chargers burring away for hours, days, weeks, and even months.

Beyond incompetent if this wasn't being done and with todays technology should be automatic and on a visual timeline providing a clear & concise who, what, where, when. just like 911 software does.

Will the public ever see it in this case only God knows.


I'm am going to go out on the shortest of limbs and say that these tapes and communication are going to be lost in the same place that the 33k emails are located as well as the contents of Hunter's laptop.

No. Chance. In. Hell.
AW 1880
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's 1/12.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL @ Can't adequately protect the President because the slope of the roof is too great.

It's like a 5-10 degree pitch, but lets get the President killed over it!
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Here is a good pic of the vantage point from Trumps perspective. The roof of the building in the top left was the shooter's perch.

There is no way you don't have that building secured and someone on top of of it.



Building the shooter was on is to the right of this photo. See location of the red combine relative to the path of the shots

agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The biggest concern of a roof with that slope is if it could hold up & shed the snow in some unusually heavy winter event. And like others have pointed out, you already had snipers on a roof with more slope than that.

That roof might the only thing that they might be able to get any of the BS they're slinging to stick to, only because of it's ever so gentle slope...
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They want you to believe it's incompetence, because if you don't believe it's incompetence the only other thing to believe is that it was intentional. So they will continue to shift blame like three card monty and hide behind a shield of incompetence to cover for their crimes…
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Foreverconservative said:

Lonestar_Ag09 said:

RED AG 98 said:

The more Cheatle speaks, the worse this gets. She needs to be fired immediately, at minimum. I look forward to the investigation and her eventual downfall....
where has she spoken? Not random one off tweets "quoting" where is an actual interview please


She's made two interviews. Both with ABC. None on FNC.

First interview she didn't want to comment about an ongoing investigation, so that was worthless

After that blew up in her face see had a second interview and shifted blame to local LEA and lame excuses for the lack of security and lapses in protocol



Ladder is still there per this video
First Page Last Page
Page 101 of 186
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.