Ahhhh…….the interweb. Home of the deepest, darkest truths.

Quote:

---

They wanted us to see the kid, he was the patsy…

Edit: It also addresses the question of why would the CIA send out an inexperienced kid to do the job? Because the wasn't making the initial kill shot, he was just taking the blame.

The real trigger man flubbed only because Trumped turned his head…

---

You know what, nobody has asked or has it been reported that there were shell casings found on the roof. Those casings would tell many things. Fingerprints would indicate if the shooter loaded the magazine.

Where is the projectile from the round that killed the fireman dad? It ended it's travel somewhere. It must be found.

That one is obviously a fake, and has been posted in various forms all over.

I guess you are sticking to ignoring/mocking any/all the informed analysis, and lack of accountability for any 'failures' to prevent the attempt/access/supplies/ladder etc., though.

Quote:

---

Either he was directed by a proxy who provided "vague" theater and operations information and guaranteed a "window," or he was "radicalized" on the internet and nudged to execute the operation "somehow" on his own. Or a combination. He did not receive instructions on how to shoot and used his (father's?) own weapon with which he was familiar.

I think it is evident that he did not know for whom he was working and did it because he wanted to. He was already radicalized. Whoever picked him for that "operation" was confident in his shooting skills. To be honest, he was not bad. He probably just picked the wrong target (head). Probably because he watched too many movies or played too many video games, where you try to achieve a headshot with no consequences if you fail.

---

It just defies explanation he was allowed in, with that gun, knew the ladder was there, and allowed to remain there for 26 minutes 'accidentally' because 'temporary/new agents' were running the security at this one rally because Dr. Jill had an event nearby that day.

FireAg said:

---

aggiephoenix02 said:

---

Yes. Trump turning his head flubbed the initial kill shot…

Edit to add: The 'pro' couldn't keep shooting once the patsy was fired upon…

---

100% spot on…

And the mistake they made here was they used only one location for the ambush…

They used multiple locations on Kennedy…

They either thought they could get it done with one, or they didn't want to risk multiple hot triggers given all of the videos and audio recordings that would have been available (way more technology available to average Joe today than in 1963)…

Anyone have video of any muzzle flash coming from the kid on the roof? Anyone have audio comparisons of the report from the discharged ammunition? Do we have any actual details on the alleged sniper's weapon yet?

They had one marksman and one patsy…Trump turned at the last second and the sniper missed…that's it…

The kid on the roof wasn't the shooter…he was there on purpose to be taken out and become the next in a long line of "crazed lone gunman" false flag explanations…

---

I don't think the geometry supports that. Where was the marksman located? Somewhere inline behind the kid?

Any trees in the area beyond the building where the kid's body was found?

My guess is same general line…much further back…

FireAg said:

---

He was ALLOWED to be there…

Government forces WANTED him there…there is quite literally no other reasonable explanation…

---

Why did the cop climb the ladder to see who he was and rush the shot?

Not everyone on the ground was in on it…

Most likely weren't…

FireAg said:

---

Not everyone on the ground was in on it…

Most likely weren't…

---

What agencies and how many people were in on it?

nortex97 said:

---

That one is obviously a fake, and has been posted in various forms all over.

I guess you are sticking to ignoring/mocking any/all the informed analysis, and lack of accountability for any 'failures' to prevent the attempt/access/supplies/ladder etc., though.

Quote:

---

Either he was directed by a proxy who provided "vague" theater and operations information and guaranteed a "window," or he was "radicalized" on the internet and nudged to execute the operation "somehow" on his own. Or a combination. He did not receive instructions on how to shoot and used his (father's?) own weapon with which he was familiar.

I think it is evident that he did not know for whom he was working and did it because he wanted to. He was already radicalized. Whoever picked him for that "operation" was confident in his shooting skills. To be honest, he was not bad. He probably just picked the wrong target (head). Probably because he watched too many movies or played too many video games, where you try to achieve a headshot with no consequences if you fail.

---

It just defies explanation he was allowed in, with that gun, knew the ladder was there, and allowed to remain there for 26 minutes 'accidentally' because 'temporary/new agents' were running the security at this one rally because Dr. Jill had an event nearby that day.

---

The guy who posted that thought it was an "informed analysis". Another was convinced the shooter worked at BlackRock………

The shooter (crooks) was in a Blackrock advert they decided to pull over the weekend after the shooting. Is that also not true in your world?

We will probably never know…

Very limited though…has to be…

You need the confusion to distract from what's actually going on…

Like a magician using sleight of hand…

Everyone on the ground is looking at and screaming about some kid with a rifle on a roof…. No one does anything… Why?

Because he was the distraction…

FireAg said:

---

We will probably never know…

Very limited though…has to be…

You need the confusion to distract from what's actually going on…

Like a magician using sleight of hand…

Everyone on the ground is looking at and screaming about some kid with a rifle on a roof…. No one does anything… Why?

Because he was the distraction…

---

Distraction to what? Another shooter? Any reports of that? Phone footage? Anything?

Why did the shooter purchase 50 rounds day of shooting? Doesn't indicate much planning.

Barnyard96 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

We will probably never know…

Very limited though…has to be…

You need the confusion to distract from what's actually going on…

Like a magician using sleight of hand…

Everyone on the ground is looking at and screaming about some kid with a rifle on a roof…. No one does anything… Why?

Because he was the distraction…

---

Distraction to what? Another shooter? Any reports of that? Phone footage? Anything?

---

Nope..and there won't be…

What's the closest clump of trees behind the dead kid? That's where I would look…

Doesn't mean the sniper was actually in a tree…but that would be my first guess as it's the easiest to conceal…

FireAg said:

---

Barnyard96 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

We will probably never know…

Very limited though…has to be…

You need the confusion to distract from what's actually going on…

Like a magician using sleight of hand…

Everyone on the ground is looking at and screaming about some kid with a rifle on a roof…. No one does anything… Why?

Because he was the distraction…

---

Distraction to what? Another shooter? Any reports of that? Phone footage? Anything?

---

Nope..and there won't be…

What's the closest clump of trees behind the dead kid? That's where I would look…

Doesn't mean the sniper was actually in a tree…but that would be my first guess as it's the easiest to conceal…

---

There wont be any phone footage because there isnt any.

You claim folks have their head in the sand while you dream up things that never happened to support a conspiracy theory.

The problem you have is the more it gets debunked, the more BS you have to create to support the theory.

FireAg said:

---

What's been debunked?

---

Multiple shooters. Instant debunk. Zero evidence to support that.

Barnyard96 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

What's been debunked?

---

Multiple shooters. Instant debunk. Zero evidence to support that.

---

I never once said there were multiple shooters…. Not once…

One shooter…

Just wasn't the kid…

FireAg said:

---

Barnyard96 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

What's been debunked?

---

Multiple shooters. Instant debunk. Zero evidence to support that.

---

I never once said there were multiple shooters…. Not once…

One shooter…

Just wasn't the kid…

---

Oh, that clears it up then. Im on board now. Let me even further the conspiracy…

Donald Trump orchestrated all of this. The real shooter, set way back in some tree is an expert marksmen who shot DJT in the ear. Its brilliant. And no one will ever be the wiser.

4D Chess.

GAC06 said:

---

There are some vivid imaginations on TexAgs

---

Yeah. I've seen some zebra hunts before, but some of this is a herd of unicorn transformers hunt. It's more than meets the eye...

FireAg said:

---

A lot of ostriches with their heads in the ground too…

---

Show me evidence of another shooter. Your imagination isn't evidence.

What other shooter? One shooter…

It's hardly worth arguing

FireAg said:

---

What other shooter? One shooter…

---

Oh ok show me evidence of the pro shooter other than the 20 year old that also missed

Foreverconservative said:

---

P.U.T.U said:

---

Now there are videos of a SS agent crouching down beside the stage right before the shooting happened. Keeps getting weirder and weirder

---

Another female

---

You have no clue if that photo is before the shots were fired.

In fact, there is more than one person reacting to 'something' based on the folks in the stands in the background and the other guy in the suite (SS??) on the right side of the photo.

So the kid was allowed to be spotted for 30 mins? Wouldnt that risk the mission?

Or is this part of the brilliance of the plan?

Also they said he climbed up on an AC unit. So no ladder

Oh man..this thread.

nortex97 said:

---

The shooter (crooks) was in a Blackrock advert they decided to pull over the weekend after the shooting. Is that also not true in your world?

---

Perfecta example! A smoking gun if we've ever seen one! Deep analysis at its finest!

He and classmates were in the background of a Blackrock commercial in 2022 featuring teachers and investing. He wasn't paid, and certainly wasn't employed by them.

So now we have BlackRock, the local police, and the obviously incompetent Secret Service all conspiring together in a twisted plot………. a twisted plot that all these incompetent people will keep secret. Seems like every day more and more people would have to be involved in this plot and would have to keep quiet.

Decay said:

---

Also they said he climbed up on an AC unit. So no ladder

---

Even worse. Dude scaled the walls multiple times. i mean, if he's doing that, there is zero way to conclude he's either a local cop or a SS agent.