Shots fired at Trump [Keep it factual -- Staff]

844,665 Views | 6497 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by gigemags-99
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The confirmed report of a kid roaming the premises with a RANGE FINDER should have triggered an immediate response. No further inquiry. Stop and frisk, find out wtf going on. No reasonable argument can be made as to why that didn't happen immediately.

Had the kid been sighted with a joint and some officer got a whiff of weed, they'd have grabbed his ass immediately.

So the fact that there were confirmed reports of this guy using a range finder out in the open at a presidential candidate rally is inexplicable.

So talking about a failure of comms or someone falling off a roof, or they didn't see a gun until the last moment. We already a mile down the road from where we should have been, and there's no denying that fact.
Schneider Electric
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

The confirmed report of a kid roaming the premises with a RANGE FINDER should have triggered an immediate response. No further inquiry. Stop and frisk, find out wtf going on. No reasonable argument can be made as to why that didn't happen immediately.

Had the kid been sighted with a joint and some officer got a whiff of weed, they'd have grabbed his ass immediately.

So the fact that there were confirmed reports of this guy using a range finder out in the open at a presidential candidate rally is inexplicable.

So talking about a failure of comms or someone falling off a roof, or they didn't see a gun until the last moment. We already a mile down the road from where we should have been, and there's no denying that fact.


Absolutely correct.
There are zero excuses. The people trying to excuse or explain away the multiple security failures have an agenda.
They are lying to try and hurt Trump. They know it.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ78 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359691041112?dicbo=v2-PCtTJYN

Now we have video from one of the victims showing Crooks moving on the building just before shooting.
passing in front of the top story windows?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

passing in front of the top story windows?
Not sure because of the angle of the camera. Everything else indicates he accessed the roof from an A/C unit to the lower connecting hallway and to the higher roof on the parking lot side. The building behind that one is not two storied on the parking lot side.
Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQ78 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359691041112?dicbo=v2-PCtTJYN

Now we have video from one of the victims showing Crooks moving on the building just before shooting.
This is the first I've seen of him from what appears like when he first got on the roof. I'd be curious to see how much time elapsed from that point to when shots fired. Gives a more definite timeline of how long he was up there.
Texmid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas velvet maestro said:

BQ78 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359691041112?dicbo=v2-PCtTJYN

Now we have video from one of the victims showing Crooks moving on the building just before shooting.
passing in front of the top story windows?
Close. It all boils down to a MASSIVE failure by the SS. Someone should have had eyes on that rooftop. The angle in that video shows just how close the building is to Trump. The fact the SS let a deranged gunmen get on that roof and fire 8 shots is mind-blowing. The SS needs a complete reset from the top down.

It is just amazing to me that they photographed Crooks from that window at some point and then never bothered to look out of it again when the guys on the ground were searching for him. Crooks either got incredibly lucky with his timing to climb on the roof, or he was helped. Who gave permission for the spotter to leave his post and go search for Crooks?
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Touchless said:

BQ78 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359691041112?dicbo=v2-PCtTJYN

Now we have video from one of the victims showing Crooks moving on the building just before shooting.
This is the first I've seen of him from what appears like when he first got on the roof. I'd be curious to see how much time elapsed from that point to when shots fired. Gives a more definite timeline of how long he was up there.
This link says the video is at 6:08 and the shots were fired at 6:11.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/video-from-trump-assassination-attempt-victims-pov-shows-figure-moving-roof-moments-before-gunfire
🤡 🤡 🤡
Texmid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One thing I still have not heard a definite answer on is his gun. Was it stashed on the premises the day before or did he bring it with him that day? Either way, how on earth does he climb on that roof with a backpack undetected?
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?


SIAP
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
StandUpforAmerica said:



SIAP
How do both sniper teams fail to see him walking across the roof?
🤡 🤡 🤡
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WTF. How did they miss seeing him???
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

WTF. How did they miss seeing him???



That shooter had huge gonads to run across that roof in plain sight knowing that there were multiple sniper teams. This just gets more odd with every new piece of information.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

How do both sniper teams fail to see him walking across the roof?
How indeed? Even if they just glimpsed some movement but were unsure what is was, still radio down to hold Trump until the situation could be clarified. Crooks might have still shot into the crowd but to do so he would have to reveal himself over the roof ridge with the snipers actively looking for him.
SeanAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Especially since all their attention was said to be at the 3 o'clock bc of the previous commotion
Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

StandUpforAmerica said:



SIAP
How do both sniper teams fail to see him walking across the roof?
Not saying this is why, but if both teams had their eyes in their optics down range scanning the crowd, that limits their vision pretty significantly. They would have had to have been looking that direction through their scope or binocs to see him walk across there.

Just saying that it's obvious to us with the video pointed right at it, but I'd bet those in the stands directly behind Trump didn't see him walking across since they weren't looking that direction.
Schneider Electric
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

passing in front of the top story windows?
Not sure because of the angle of the camera. Everything else indicates he accessed the roof from an A/C unit to the lower connecting hallway and to the higher roof on the parking lot side. The building behind that one is not two storied on the parking lot side.


The video that shows someone traversing the roof is zoomed in a great deal. That hurts depth of field and makes that building seem closer than it is.

That's what Fox anchor said when they aired it earlier

Just fyi
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tailgate88 said:

aginlakeway said:

WTF. How did they miss seeing him???
That shooter had huge gonads to run across that roof in plain sight knowing that there were multiple sniper teams. This just gets more odd with every new piece of information.
The kid was on a suicide mission.

In any other universe this would be suicide-by-cop.

Hard to imagine that the kid himself even thought he'd make it this far.

Whats shocking about the whole deal is the kid smart enough to put together a plan to foil the entire USSS and Local police, but not smart enough to understand that he would more than likely get shot on sight.

The whole story is unbelievable. Everything about what we've seen stretches the bounds of credulity to the max. There no reasonable explanation for the way this played out.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texmid said:

Texas velvet maestro said:

BQ78 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359691041112?dicbo=v2-PCtTJYN

Now we have video from one of the victims showing Crooks moving on the building just before shooting.
passing in front of the top story windows?
Close. It all boils down to a MASSIVE failure by the SS. Someone should have had eyes on that rooftop. The angle in that video shows just how close the building is to Trump. The fact the SS let a deranged gunmen get on that roof and fire 8 shots is mind-blowing. The SS needs a complete reset from the top down.

It is just amazing to me that they photographed Crooks from that window at some point and then never bothered to look out of it again when the guys on the ground were searching for him. Crooks either got incredibly lucky with his timing to climb on the roof, or he was helped. Who gave permission for the spotter to leave his post and go search for Crooks?


Need to go back and check the timeline, but one of the police snipers photographed him from the window where they were stationed (before leaving to go look for Crooks), and then sent that apparently up their chain of comms, but not when Crooks was on the roof. He was sitting on a ledge next to the building at ground level for that over the shoulder picture, I believe it was a little after 5.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Nah, let's leave him on the 'X.' The local PD will take care of it. That's their job." -or something?

Local law enforcement strikes back:

Quote:

Quote:

(NewsNation) Local law enforcement in Butler, Pennsylvania, is firing back against comments made by acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe in a joint Senate committee regarding the attempt on former President Donald Trump's life.
Rowe criticized the local authorities for a communications breakdown between agencies protecting the former president. But Pat Young, the chief of detectives for Beaver County who was tasked with securing the area around Trump's rally, said they had no communication with the federal authorities that day.
"Somehow, that we should have had a line of sight on not only the crowd but the area to the side of the building where the shooter was eventually located is kind of ridiculous," Young told NewsNation. "The ability to redeploy to another area is also kind of this ridiculous notion that's out there that somehow our guys, despite guidance from Secret Service, could somehow relocate to a better vantage point is almost laughable in some regards."
Young insists that it was his team that spotted the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, roughly an hour before the actual shooting took place. He said they raised it up the chain of command, and said what happens beyond that is up to the Secret Service.
This is absurd. Director Rowe abjectly apologized to Congress that this happened, but he blamed others, was in charge when resources were denied to the Trump protective detail, and likely had a role himself in making that decision. He won't say, simply stating there was a "process."
It's an absurdity that Rowe, who played a significant role in denying resources to the Trump security team, is somehow involved in investigating the failures.
Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

Touchless said:

BQ78 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359691041112?dicbo=v2-PCtTJYN

Now we have video from one of the victims showing Crooks moving on the building just before shooting.
This is the first I've seen of him from what appears like when he first got on the roof. I'd be curious to see how much time elapsed from that point to when shots fired. Gives a more definite timeline of how long he was up there.
This link says the video is at 6:08 and the shots were fired at 6:11.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/video-from-trump-assassination-attempt-victims-pov-shows-figure-moving-roof-moments-before-gunfire
I just looked at it when watching the full speech. From the time that video first starts highlighting him on the roof, it's 2 minutes and 55 seconds. So basically 3 full minutes.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't some scopes record? The Hubs has a night vision scope that records.
Schneider Electric
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

"Nah, let's leave him on the 'X.' The local PD will take care of it. That's their job." -or something?

Local law enforcement strikes back:

Quote:

Quote:

(NewsNation) Local law enforcement in Butler, Pennsylvania, is firing back against comments made by acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe in a joint Senate committee regarding the attempt on former President Donald Trump's life.
Rowe criticized the local authorities for a communications breakdown between agencies protecting the former president. But Pat Young, the chief of detectives for Beaver County who was tasked with securing the area around Trump's rally, said they had no communication with the federal authorities that day.
"Somehow, that we should have had a line of sight on not only the crowd but the area to the side of the building where the shooter was eventually located is kind of ridiculous," Young told NewsNation. "The ability to redeploy to another area is also kind of this ridiculous notion that's out there that somehow our guys, despite guidance from Secret Service, could somehow relocate to a better vantage point is almost laughable in some regards."
Young insists that it was his team that spotted the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, roughly an hour before the actual shooting took place. He said they raised it up the chain of command, and said what happens beyond that is up to the Secret Service.
This is absurd. Director Rowe abjectly apologized to Congress that this happened, but he blamed others, was in charge when resources were denied to the Trump protective detail, and likely had a role himself in making that decision. He won't say, simply stating there was a "process."
It's an absurdity that Rowe, who played a significant role in denying resources to the Trump security team, is somehow involved in investigating the failures.


The king has taken your complaints seriously. He has ordered an investigation. After an exhaustive investigation he has found he did nothing wrong.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Touchless said:

VegasAg86 said:

StandUpforAmerica said:



SIAP
How do both sniper teams fail to see him walking across the roof?
Not saying this is why, but if both teams had their eyes in their optics down range scanning the crowd, that limits their vision pretty significantly. They would have had to have been looking that direction through their scope or binocs to see him walk across there.

Just saying that it's obvious to us with the video pointed right at it, but I'd bet those in the stands directly behind Trump didn't see him walking across since they weren't looking that direction.
There were people on the ground around the building telling cops there was someone on the building at least 1-3 minutes before shots were fired.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Don't some scopes record? The Hubs has a night vision scope that records.
asked, and answered.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Texmid said:

Texas velvet maestro said:

BQ78 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359691041112?dicbo=v2-PCtTJYN

Now we have video from one of the victims showing Crooks moving on the building just before shooting.
passing in front of the top story windows?
Close. It all boils down to a MASSIVE failure by the SS. Someone should have had eyes on that rooftop. The angle in that video shows just how close the building is to Trump. The fact the SS let a deranged gunmen get on that roof and fire 8 shots is mind-blowing. The SS needs a complete reset from the top down.

It is just amazing to me that they photographed Crooks from that window at some point and then never bothered to look out of it again when the guys on the ground were searching for him. Crooks either got incredibly lucky with his timing to climb on the roof, or he was helped. Who gave permission for the spotter to leave his post and go search for Crooks?


Need to go back and check the timeline, but one of the police snipers photographed him from the window where they were stationed (before leaving to go look for Crooks), and then sent that apparently up their chain of comms, but not when Crooks was on the roof. He was sitting on a ledge next to the building at ground level for that over the shoulder picture, I believe it was a little after 5.
He was walking around the building at least an hour before the shots. All on video.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas velvet maestro said:

aggiehawg said:

Don't some scopes record? The Hubs has a night vision scope that records.
asked, and answered.
You understand what my question was. If a night scope can record, why not other scopes with a blue tooth connection to another device?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas velvet maestro said:

aggiehawg said:

Don't some scopes record? The Hubs has a night vision scope that records.
asked, and answered.
They didn't even record the radio comm's that day (supposedly), so I see no reasonable expectation imagery will be admitted publicly as to being recorded.
Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMU1990 said:

Touchless said:

VegasAg86 said:

StandUpforAmerica said:



SIAP
How do both sniper teams fail to see him walking across the roof?
Not saying this is why, but if both teams had their eyes in their optics down range scanning the crowd, that limits their vision pretty significantly. They would have had to have been looking that direction through their scope or binocs to see him walk across there.

Just saying that it's obvious to us with the video pointed right at it, but I'd bet those in the stands directly behind Trump didn't see him walking across since they weren't looking that direction.
There were people on the ground around the building telling cops there was someone on the building at least 1-3 minutes before shots were fired.
Yes, but he only walked on the top of the building for 7 or 8 seconds. The question was how did both sniper teams fail to see him walk on the roof for those 7-8 seconds. I'm also assuming he's referring to both sniper teams that were behind Trump, and not the 3rd team that was in the building on the 2nd floor. I just explained how it's possible those two teams didn't see him during that short period of time.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Texas velvet maestro said:

aggiehawg said:

Don't some scopes record? The Hubs has a night vision scope that records.
asked, and answered.
You understand what my question was. If a night scope can record, why not other scopes with a blue tooth connection to another device?
You know that answer too.
"it wasn't working that day" (if the subject were to even come up). best case scenario: "we'll get back to you
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Humans evolved to have superior pattern recognition. Anybody in the crowd with a modicum of situational awareness sees a kid scurrying on the roofline like that and their spidey sense activates.
Schneider Electric
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The county snipers were not set up in the window the USSS director said they were. They were not able to see that part of roof according to their supervisor. His interview was a fox story iirc.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the point was for him to be seen, so much makes sense. But he was suicidal, crazy and lucky on a day when the USSS really was off their game.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Humans evolved to have superior pattern recognition. Anybody in the crowd with a modicum of situational awareness sees a kid scurrying on the roofline like that and their spidey sense activates.
See the direction they are running towards, narrowing down where to continue looking for him, leading him so to speak.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

JFABNRGR said:

nortex97 said:

That guy is an abject liar though. Yet, so is the FBI/USSS:



Why are they lying about this is my question?


and he was reading this from a PREPARED SCRIPT that he brought to a Q&A.


I agree it was confusing and strange to offer that information without confirming. I only have read summaries so far since I couldn't watch, but it seemed like he was describing a different account than the gab account right? I thought the timelines were off.


I listened to most of it and any person who has half a brain and an opinion on this event should also watch the whole thing.

No prepared notes or reports on timelines or actions of officers onsite that day after 17 days of investigation including interviewing all but low and behold a full report on the shooters political motivations or lack there of from an unverified SM site.
First Page Last Page
Page 168 of 186
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.