WSJ: Musk exposed himself to female employees, encouraged them to have his children

12,678 Views | 91 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Deluxe
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sq 17 said:

Verification complete means The allegations have sufficient corroboration for the news outlet to run the story.
Lots of really rich guys out there that don't have these sorts allegations popping up every year

Bob McNair and Drayton manage to not have these allegations brought against them Daniel Snyder Jerry Jones do have these stories circulating around them.
McNair's main defense against these allegations is that he died 6 years ago.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Porkchop Express said:

Sq 17 said:

Verification complete means The allegations have sufficient corroboration for the news outlet to run the story.
Lots of really rich guys out there that don't have these sorts allegations popping up every year

Bob McNair and Drayton manage to not have these allegations brought against them Daniel Snyder Jerry Jones do have these stories circulating around them.
McNair's main defense against these allegations is that he died 6 years ago.

But he still votes democrat just in case...
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No no no, I asked them if they wanted to ride a horse. /Musk
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Porkchop Express said:

Sq 17 said:

Verification complete means The allegations have sufficient corroboration for the news outlet to run the story.
Lots of really rich guys out there that don't have these sorts allegations popping up every year

Bob McNair and Drayton manage to not have these allegations brought against them Daniel Snyder Jerry Jones do have these stories circulating around them.
McNair's main defense against these allegations is that he died 6 years ago.

So he's been voting Democrat for a while.

Dammit 92, quicker to the retort.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Ag Natural
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

Its official. The press is convinced Musk is voting for Trump.
Isn't the Wall Street Journal owned by the same guy who owns Fox News?
sleepybeagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kenneth_2003 said:

Seems like this hit piece gets rewritten every few months with the same stories and the same allegations.
I believe that this article is Russian disinformation.

Did I do that right?
sleepybeagle
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag Natural said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Its official. The press is convinced Musk is voting for Trump.
Isn't the Wall Street Journal owned by the same guy who owns Fox News?


Murdoch?

He/they supported Hillary. So.....
Tom Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nai06 said:

It seems like he's lowkey into eugenics as is a lot of silicon valley. The idea being that really smart people should be the ones having lots of kids in order to produce more really smart people.

He's been quoted as saying, "if each successive generation of smart people has fewer kids, that's probably bad."

He's also said that he doesn't want other people to stop having kids; he simply wants "smart" people to have more.

The director of Neurolink Shivon Zillis confirmed his stance and he also happens to be the sperm donor for her two kids. There was also a rumor circulating that he has an open offer of his sperm to anyone at neurolink that wants it.


I mean … he's not wrong. Mainly stupid people are breeding. With IQ being largely genetic, that is not a recipe for long term success.
ParisTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
$TSLA has been the most shorted stock on Wall Street ... get it?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag Natural said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Its official. The press is convinced Musk is voting for Trump.
Isn't the Wall Street Journal owned by the same guy who owns Fox News?
What does this mean?

Rupert Murdoch's kids are raging lefitsts. But yes, I am sure you think all media should be radically leftist. Do you support social media censorship from the government, too?
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Ag Natural said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Its official. The press is convinced Musk is voting for Trump.
Isn't the Wall Street Journal owned by the same guy who owns Fox News?
What does this mean?

Rupert Murdoch's kids are raging lefitsts. But yes, I am sure you think all media should be radically leftist. Do you support social media censorship from the government, too?


Yep. I think they just called Arizona for Biden for 2024.
AggieMac06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
250k to look at his junk? Where do I sign up?
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:

BassCowboy33 said:

FrankK said:

We've seen this kind of BS many times before. Curious if the allegations started pre or post X acquisition announcement.


The article says the paperwork trail for these specific allegations dates back as far as 2017.


Definitely possibly damning, but allegations happen all of the time and people get paid off to make it go away for a plethora of reasons:

1) actual guilt
2) avoidance of negative press
3) business effects
Etc.

4. Cheaper and faster to cut the check, have them sign and agreement and move on
Buck Turgidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everybody knows this is being drummed up now because Musk is no longer in bed with the Dems. They are punishing him for not being sufficiently woke.
Ag Natural
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Ag Natural said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Its official. The press is convinced Musk is voting for Trump.
Isn't the Wall Street Journal owned by the same guy who owns Fox News?
What does this mean?

Rupert Murdoch's kids are raging lefitsts. But yes, I am sure you think all media should be radically leftist. Do you support social media censorship from the government, too?
It means calling this some sort of "press" fabricated hit piece ignores the source. The WSJ is probably the only national publication that has managed to stick to journalism, outside of the OpEd section of course.

And no, I don't think media should be right or left. A vast majority do appear to have an agenda, so I most choose to stick to sports.
Buck Turgidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty sensible position. Breed you best, not your worst.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buck Turgidson said:

Pretty sensible position. Breed you best, not your worst.
and here I thought the majority of this board was opposed to Eugenics
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

He's also said that he doesn't want other people to stop having kids; he simply wants "smart" people to have more.
The quote is your own words from an earlier post. That is not eugenics.

But you already know that.
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nai06 said:

Buck Turgidson said:

Pretty sensible position. Breed you best, not your worst.
and here I thought the majority of this board was opposed to Eugenics


It's pathetic watching someone try to argue that this (someone arguing that smart people should procreate more frequently than they are) is what people object to relative to "Eugenics." Don't you feel even a little bit dirty attempting such a disingenuous reach?

hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This was a last minute Hail Mary to disrupt the vote to recertify his 2018 pay package. Not a coincidence it dropped just before the voting deadline.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag Natural said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Ag Natural said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Its official. The press is convinced Musk is voting for Trump.
Isn't the Wall Street Journal owned by the same guy who owns Fox News?
What does this mean?

Rupert Murdoch's kids are raging lefitsts. But yes, I am sure you think all media should be radically leftist. Do you support social media censorship from the government, too?
It means calling this some sort of "press" fabricated hit piece ignores the source. The WSJ is probably the only national publication that has managed to stick to journalism, outside of the OpEd section of course.

And no, I don't think media should be right or left. A vast majority do appear to have an agenda, so I most choose to stick to sports.
The WSJ is going to ****, too. Hate to break it to you.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elon had his Tesla pay package and recorp in Texas approved today. Love it when coordinated/strategically-timed journalistic smear jobs fail to achieve their purpose.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.