I've always thought the GOP would never consider some of the tactics the left does because at their heart conservatives believe in decorum and a sense of fairness. But if they don't recognize the gloves are off now and that they need to fight back with everything they've got, then we deserve our fate.

Snoddy said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

AggieDub14 said:

---

Or if they falsify business records to secretly pay a pornstar they had sex with while married in an effort to keep their dirty secret quiet during an election.

---

How misinformed can you be?

---

What part is misinformation? Can't wait for this one ...

12 grand jury members, and 12 other jury members ... all of whom were okay'd by the defense ... decided the charges were plausible, and that he was guilty of all of them. YOU don't have to understand the crimes, in fact it's highly likely you understand much of anything related to this whole situation given your stance/argument ... but ALL of the other people had no trouble understanding and finding undeniable, undisputable proof that crimes were committed, and committed by djt.

B*^ch and moan and conspire all you want. This was about as simple of absolute law and order as it gets. Unanimity amongst all 12 jurors, in a few short hours of deliberation, decided that it was pretty clear.

But, don't let that stop you all from the creative conspiratorial stories ... they're predictable, but still funny as hell!

---

Funny? You must be severely deranged if you think anything about this case is funny. Your ramblings ensure that you lack any sort of ability to analyze complex situations with any sort of accuracy or intellect. Try to be smarter.

He's another premium poster. He's here to spike the football. He didn't follow the case and doesn't know or care about the facts.

Sadly, the Constitution is meaningless to millions, except when they need its protection for themselves. They're happy enough to jail people who disagree with them politically. To save democracy, of course. For the good of democracy, we all have to act in The Party's best interests.

ts5641 said:

---

I've always thought the GOP would never consider some of the tactics the left does because at their heart conservatives believe in decorum and a sense of fairness. But if they don't recognize the gloves are off now and that they need to fight back with everything they've got, then we deserve our fate.

---

The GOP is spineless. They don't even want the appearance that they're just prosecuting political rivals so they look the other way when their political rivals are blatantly breaking the law.

The GOP is not the party of law and order

I could court shop for a venue in deepest red Misssissippi, find 12 jurors there who love Trump and despise Biden

I could make sure I got a Trump appointed judge who openly hates Biden and whose kids receive millions from the Trump election campaign

I could refuse to let Biden call expert testimony from the Federal Election Committee to explicitly say no crime was committed here because I say that isn't relevant to the case while at the time letting the prosecution make it the cornerstone of their argument that a crime even exists here

I could present no actual evidence of any crime I was alleging and have my entire case rest on the testimony of a disbarred lawyer who has openly lied to everyone, including Congress and say "but this guy is telling the truth now when he said this is what happened"

I could instruct said jury that it doesn't matter if they don't agree on what they think he's guilty of or why, just that they all think he's probably guilty of something and call that a unanimous verdict

I could easily do all those things but somehow I doubt these same Leftys saying. "Justice was served" would feel that way if I did that to Biden said "but a jury of his peers found him guilty"

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

He's another premium poster. He's here to spike the football. He didn't follow the case and doesn't know or care about the facts.

Sadly, the Constitution is meaningless to millions, except when they need its protection for themselves. They're happy enough to jail people who disagree with them politically. To save democracy, of course. For the good of democracy, we all have to act in The Party's best interests.

---

And he's a graduate of the Dunning Kruger School for The Gifted. Just ask him.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

I could court shop for a venue in deepest red Misssissippi, find 12 jurors there who love Trump and despise Biden

I could make sure I got a Trump appointed judge who openly hates Biden and whose kids receive millions from the Trump election campaign

I could refuse to let Biden call expert testimony from the Federal Election Committee to explicitly say no crime was committed here because I say that isn't relevant to the case while at the time letting the prosecution make it the cornerstone of their argument that a crime even exists here

I could present no actual evidence of any crime I was alleging and have my entire case rest on the testimony of a disbarred lawyer who has openly lied to everyone, including Congress and say "but this guy is telling the truth now when he said this is what happened"

I could instruct said jury that it doesn't matter if they don't agree on what they think he's guilty of or why, just that they all think he's probably guilty of something and call that a unanimous verdict

I could easily do all those things but somehow I doubt these same Leftys saying. "Justice was served" would feel that way if I did that to Biden said "but a jury of his peers found him guilty"

---

What's stopping you?

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

He's another premium poster. He's here to spike the football. He didn't follow the case and doesn't know or care about the facts.

Sadly, the Constitution is meaningless to millions, except when they need its protection for themselves. They're happy enough to jail people who disagree with them politically. To save democracy, of course. For the good of democracy, we all have to act in The Party's best interests.

---

And he's a graduate of the Dunning Kruger School for The Gifted. Just ask him.

---

If you say so

Maybe because he isn't a DA. Now you are trolling.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Maybe because he isn't a DA. Now you are trolling.

---

Allegedly the left is hemorrhaging crime ... shouldn't be hard to find a court to take a case.

Better not. Don't want van prior to baseball

Democrats have ruined America.

BREAKING: Biden Justice Dept cleaned up transcript of Biden's interview w/ Special Counsel Hur to remove his stuttering, pauses & other indications he lost his train of thought. Judicial Watch chief Tom Fitton: "The transcript is not accurate & was changed in a way to help Biden"

— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) June 2, 2024

ETA: And the recording itself has been marked as classified and in a SCIF courtesy of Merrick Garland

Snoddy said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

I could court shop for a venue in deepest red Misssissippi, find 12 jurors there who love Trump and despise Biden

I could make sure I got a Trump appointed judge who openly hates Biden and whose kids receive millions from the Trump election campaign

I could refuse to let Biden call expert testimony from the Federal Election Committee to explicitly say no crime was committed here because I say that isn't relevant to the case while at the time letting the prosecution make it the cornerstone of their argument that a crime even exists here

I could present no actual evidence of any crime I was alleging and have my entire case rest on the testimony of a disbarred lawyer who has openly lied to everyone, including Congress and say "but this guy is telling the truth now when he said this is what happened"

I could instruct said jury that it doesn't matter if they don't agree on what they think he's guilty of or why, just that they all think he's probably guilty of something and call that a unanimous verdict

I could easily do all those things but somehow I doubt these same Leftys saying. "Justice was served" would feel that way if I did that to Biden said "but a jury of his peers found him guilty"

---

What's stopping you?

---

If I did would you then say Biden got a fair trial and that Justice was served because that jury unanimously convicted him?

🚨🚨🚨The WH doctored the Biden transcript with Special Counsel Hur about his classified docs!!!

They just convicted Trump for fake crimes.

Does everyone see what is happening??!!!

We control the HOUSE.

We have to act.

No more pathetic excuses. https://t.co/SR2yUmbIMY

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) June 1, 2024

aggiehawg said:

---

🚨🚨🚨The WH doctored the Biden transcript with Special Counsel Hur about his classified docs!!!

They just convicted Trump for fake crimes.

Does everyone see what is happening??!!!

We control the HOUSE.

We have to act.

No more pathetic excuses. https://t.co/SR2yUmbIMY

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) June 1, 2024

---

Democrats always accuse the other side of what they themselves are doing.

aggiehawg said:

---

🚨🚨🚨The WH doctored the Biden transcript with Special Counsel Hur about his classified docs!!!

They just convicted Trump for fake crimes.

Does everyone see what is happening??!!!

We control the HOUSE.

We have to act.

No more pathetic excuses. https://t.co/SR2yUmbIMY

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) June 1, 2024

---

If it was as simple as one or two stutters or repetitions they wouldn't have Memory Holed the audio

My guess is what's on that recording is pure, unfiltered Biden with no prep, no drugs, no teleprompter, no ear piece, just his demented self trying to answer simple questions with no help or handlers to hide the dementia

annie88 said:

---

There was literally no crime. Trump didn't do anything.

This was all manufactured, political persecution, bull***** You're not paying attention.

---

Now if we can convince the true conservatives from trying to destroy her. She has the tenacity we need at this point.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Snoddy said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

I could court shop for a venue in deepest red Misssissippi, find 12 jurors there who love Trump and despise Biden

I could make sure I got a Trump appointed judge who openly hates Biden and whose kids receive millions from the Trump election campaign

I could refuse to let Biden call expert testimony from the Federal Election Committee to explicitly say no crime was committed here because I say that isn't relevant to the case while at the time letting the prosecution make it the cornerstone of their argument that a crime even exists here

I could present no actual evidence of any crime I was alleging and have my entire case rest on the testimony of a disbarred lawyer who has openly lied to everyone, including Congress and say "but this guy is telling the truth now when he said this is what happened"

I could instruct said jury that it doesn't matter if they don't agree on what they think he's guilty of or why, just that they all think he's probably guilty of something and call that a unanimous verdict

I could easily do all those things but somehow I doubt these same Leftys saying. "Justice was served" would feel that way if I did that to Biden said "but a jury of his peers found him guilty"

---

What's stopping you?

---

If I did would you then say Biden got a fair trial and that Justice was served because that jury unanimously convicted him?

---

For what crime? If he committed a crime, I'd do my best to be partial, as much as you presumably believe that's an impossibility. Biden is not a deity... he's just a guy that got elected president.

I think Hunter should be tried and will accept whatever he gets.

Are you seriously saying that Biden has not committed a crime?

Can't help but notice you very intentionally didn't answer the question at all

In your opinion, if what I described happened to Biden, would you say that was a fair trial?

Turning a misdemeanor consumer finance offense into a felony for the sole purpose of smearing a presidential candidate is about as weak sauce as there is.

Tell me with a straight face that if the defendant was named someone other than Donald Trump this case would've ever seen a courtroom.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Can't help but notice you very intentionally didn't answer the question at all

In your opinion, if what I described happened to Biden, would you say that was a fair trial?

---

Did he commit the crime? Can it be proven?

Snoddy said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Can't help but notice you very intentionally didn't answer the question at all

In your opinion, if what I described happened to Biden, would you say that was a fair trial?

---

Did he commit the crime? Can it be proven?

---

No one proved Trump committed a crime. In fact, he didn't.

When the venue, judge, jury, and defense are all rigged, proving the crime is completely unnecessarily.

You're giddy that it happened.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

Are you seriously saying that Biden has not committed a crime?

---

I'm saying if he did, what crime? I'm saying that if he committed a crime, and there was sufficient evidence to indict, and he was convicted in court ... hypothetically, yes, I would accept the judgement and punishment. Again ... we don't look at Biden like you do Trump. He is not a god. Biden is just a man like any other.

I realize it's easy for me to say being on my side ... but that's my hypothetical answer to a vague, hypothetical question.

Yes he mishandled classified information but ruled too incompetent to understand what he did. Then to make it worse they cleaned up his mumbling in transcripts.

Poor Snoddy, he absolutely knows that the scenario I described would not be a fair trial for Biden at all but he's desperate not to say so lest he admit the tyrannical horror he votes for

You seem very partisan for some reason.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Snoddy said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Can't help but notice you very intentionally didn't answer the question at all

In your opinion, if what I described happened to Biden, would you say that was a fair trial?

---

Did he commit the crime? Can it be proven?

---

No one proved Trump committed a crime. In fact, he didn't.

When the venue, judge, jury, and defense are all rigged, proving the crime is completely unnecessarily.

You're giddy that it happened.

---

It's your right to hold that opinion. The Courts say otherwise .. regardless of your conspiracies of judicial partiality.

Due Process allows Trump an appeal process to fight his case. This isn't over.

Re: 'giddy' ... I think Trump/MAGA is an absolutely vile and despicable culture. I think justice was proven and served, and I'm certainly not unhappy about it.

It isn't my opinion that the venue, judge, jury, and defense were rigged and that the prosecution invented a "crime" that was never before prosecuted. Thats all fact.

You think Trump is vile. I know Biden is a sexual criminal and a Marxist. I'll take vile.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Poor Snoddy, he absolutely knows that the scenario I described would not be a fair trial for Biden at all but he's desperate not to say so lest he admit the tyrannical horror he votes for

---

I think I've sufficiently answered the question. Don't get butthurt because I didn't give you the answer/narrative you were hoping for.

Snoddy said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Snoddy said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Can't help but notice you very intentionally didn't answer the question at all

In your opinion, if what I described happened to Biden, would you say that was a fair trial?

---

Did he commit the crime? Can it be proven?

---

No one proved Trump committed a crime. In fact, he didn't.

When the venue, judge, jury, and defense are all rigged, proving the crime is completely unnecessarily.

You're giddy that it happened.

---

It's your right to hold that opinion. The Courts say otherwise .. regardless of your conspiracies of judicial partiality.

Due Process allows Trump an appeal process to fight his case. This isn't over.

Re: 'giddy' ... I think Trump/MAGA is an absolutely vile and despicable culture. I think justice was proven and served, and I'm certainly not unhappy about it.

---

Tell me, do you like partial birth abortion where a 9 month old fetus's head is crushed and the body cut up to remove it from the womb? Do you believe a 12 year old's genitals can be mutilated because they think they're trans? Because that is what the opposite culture of MAGA celebrates, liberal Democrats.

Is MAGA (Make America Great Again) really so vile?

So did Biden mishandle classified information?

Snoddy said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Poor Snoddy, he absolutely knows that the scenario I described would not be a fair trial for Biden at all but he's desperate not to say so lest he admit the tyrannical horror he votes for

---

I think I've sufficiently answered the question. Don't get butthurt because I didn't give you the answer/narrative you were hoping for.

---

No you have avoided answering at all costs but here's your chance:

Yes or No (no need for anything else)

In the scenario I described, would Biden be receiving a fair trial?

Yes or no