So, arrest Joe Biden.Quote:
Under Title 40 U.S. Code 5104, a person may not "parade, stand or move in processions or assemblages in the grounds" or "display in the grounds a flag, banner or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization, or movement."
Civil DisorderRockdoc said:2040huck said:
Uh, some of these poles were used as weapons. Dude looks like an idiot
So he was charged with carrying a poll? Man you'll cover for anything won't you.
Man, they really don't want pollsters in the Capitol, do they?2040huck said:Civil DisorderRockdoc said:2040huck said:
Uh, some of these poles were used as weapons. Dude looks like an idiot
So he was charged with carrying a poll? Man you'll cover for anything won't you.
Obstruction of an Official Proceeding
Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Impeding Ingress and Egress in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building
Impeding Passage Through the Capitol Grounds or Buildings
Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building
Here are the actual charges
2040huck said:Civil DisorderRockdoc said:2040huck said:
Uh, some of these poles were used as weapons. Dude looks like an idiot
So he was charged with carrying a poll? Man you'll cover for anything won't you.
Obstruction of an Official Proceeding
Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Impeding Ingress and Egress in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building
Impeding Passage Through the Capitol Grounds or Buildings
Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building
Here are the actual charges
There is not one. That is the point. By the way, it is spelled poleRockdoc said:2040huck said:Civil DisorderRockdoc said:2040huck said:
Uh, some of these poles were used as weapons. Dude looks like an idiot
So he was charged with carrying a poll? Man you'll cover for anything won't you.
Obstruction of an Official Proceeding
Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Impeding Ingress and Egress in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building
Impeding Passage Through the Capitol Grounds or Buildings
Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building
Here are the actual charges
Where's the poll charge? That's what you're worried about.
2040huck said:There is not one. That is the point. By the way, it is spelled poleRockdoc said:2040huck said:Civil DisorderRockdoc said:2040huck said:
Uh, some of these poles were used as weapons. Dude looks like an idiot
So he was charged with carrying a poll? Man you'll cover for anything won't you.
Obstruction of an Official Proceeding
Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Impeding Ingress and Egress in a Restricted Building or Grounds
Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building
Impeding Passage Through the Capitol Grounds or Buildings
Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building
Here are the actual charges
Where's the poll charge? That's what you're worried about.
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
I am pretty consistent about calling them commies. But that is today's Democrat, not JFK- era Democrats.
He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
So who had a problem with the US Flag?TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
OK? I didn't say he was.
eric76 said:So who had a problem with the US Flag?TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
OK? I didn't say he was.
He was charged with legitimate charges, not for carrying the US Flag.TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:So who had a problem with the US Flag?TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
OK? I didn't say he was.
Having a problem with something is the same as charging someone with a crime? Don't you have something better you could be doing?
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.eric76 said:He was charged with legitimate charges, not for carrying the US Flag.TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:So who had a problem with the US Flag?TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
OK? I didn't say he was.
Having a problem with something is the same as charging someone with a crime? Don't you have something better you could be doing?
Because it wasn't.Quote:
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.
lolaggiehawg said:Because it wasn't.Quote:
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.
Violations of 40 U.S. Code 5104 - Unlawful activities can carry penalties of fines and imprisonment. How are such violations not crimes?aggiehawg said:Because it wasn't.Quote:
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.
Ok? What I'm trying to get at, and I'll spell it out real clear here, is do you know the difference between having a problem with someone and charging them with a crime?eric76 said:He was charged with legitimate charges, not for carrying the US Flag.TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:So who had a problem with the US Flag?TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
OK? I didn't say he was.
Having a problem with something is the same as charging someone with a crime? Don't you have something better you could be doing?
That's why she tries so hard to show loyalty. She'd be a huge Karen for the terrorist in gaza.bobbranco said:Another traitorous Democrat.Trajan88 said:
And this America-last Representative gets away with this because the law exempts her and her colleagues.
And the wench would be stoned by her people.
2040huck said:Who was hit with a pole?bobbranco said:Who was gored?2040huck said:
Uh, some of these poles were used as weapons. Dude looks like an idiot
Yep.TexAgs91 said:Ok? What I'm trying to get at, and I'll spell it out real clear here, is do you know the difference between having a problem with someone and charging them with a crime?eric76 said:He was charged with legitimate charges, not for carrying the US Flag.TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:So who had a problem with the US Flag?TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
OK? I didn't say he was.
Having a problem with something is the same as charging someone with a crime? Don't you have something better you could be doing?
But you do fill the thread with posts misrepresenting what I said, including your sentence right above this sentence. Why? Does it make it easier to debate when you misrepresent others?eric76 said:Yep.TexAgs91 said:Ok? What I'm trying to get at, and I'll spell it out real clear here, is do you know the difference between having a problem with someone and charging them with a crime?eric76 said:He was charged with legitimate charges, not for carrying the US Flag.TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:So who had a problem with the US Flag?TexAgs91 said:eric76 said:He was not charged for carrying a US flag into the capitol.TexAgs91 said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:While true, it should never need to. The process of getting to the SC requires time and money, which this guy should not have to expend.C@LAg said:
seems like a 1A issue the supreme court can *****-slap in about 2 seconds.
To hell with Democrats. All of them.
Democrats wouldn't have a problem with the US flag in the capitol. Time to start calling them what they are: Marxists.
OK? I didn't say he was.
Having a problem with something is the same as charging someone with a crime? Don't you have something better you could be doing?
But I don't color it as "having a problem with someone" because of politics.
lol = I'm in 7th grade.2040huck said:lolaggiehawg said:Because it wasn't.Quote:
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:lol = I'm in 7th grade.2040huck said:lolaggiehawg said:Because it wasn't.Quote:
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.
When the Capitol police lowered ropes and just let them in, that is not breaking into anything.
Next I suppose you're going to say that was an insurrection, where the most threatening thing was a horned helmet and an old lady.
Dang you are dumb. Something less than 7th grade obviously. You didnt notice the broken windows and doors and officers that were assaulted? You probably think this damage was an inside job set up by Soros and the DOJ. lolCinco Ranch Aggie said:lol = I'm in 7th grade.2040huck said:lolaggiehawg said:Because it wasn't.Quote:
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.
When the Capitol police lowered ropes and just let them in, that is not breaking into anything.
Next I suppose you're going to say that was an insurrection, where the most threatening thing was a horned helmet and an old lady.
Hmmm. No Ag Tag. Yet you call me dumb.2040huck said:Dang you are dumb. Something less than 7th grade obviously. You didnt notice the broken windows and doors and officers that were assaulted? You probably think this damage was an inside job set up by Soros and the DOJ. lolCinco Ranch Aggie said:lol = I'm in 7th grade.2040huck said:lolaggiehawg said:Because it wasn't.Quote:
Stop trying to convince them . They will never believe that breaking into the capital is a crime.
When the Capitol police lowered ropes and just let them in, that is not breaking into anything.
Next I suppose you're going to say that was an insurrection, where the most threatening thing was a horned helmet and an old lady.
