Liz Cheney. lol. She's the political version of Milhouse:

Trump (allegedly) has relations with a porn star and a Playboy model.
Not savory and conducive to a good marriage (if true),but not illegal.

On the flip side...

Biden (allegedly) showered with his underage daughter.
Biden (allegedly) is "the big guy" and has taken millions from foreign nationals.

Perhaps, Lez Chaney needs to reconsider her absurd response.

If the Dems' retort to Biden's moral failures is to say 'See, Trump is bad too...', then let's start from there.


Both Biden and Trump are not morally sound people.

With that as our starting point, and knowing they're now our only options....which morally bankrupt person is better at running the country?

There is no debate.

Dick Cheney, his daughter, and a bunch of other "conservatives" were all just a group of sleeper cell globalists waiting on the moment that they would be called on to fight an independent and free US/West.

Was it money? Was it a love of power? Was it evil in their hearts?

Yes

Why is Premium filled with so many liberals?

BigRobSA said:

---

Why is Premium filled with so many liberals?

---

Its not, it just better represents the overall makeup of the population. This board does not.

it sucks for people who place a high value on morals and character to drive a sense of right and wrong to be stuck having to choose between a candidate on his third marriage who has been with a porn star and another one who got with his kids' babysitter while she was still married after his first wife died, showered with his teenaged daughter, raped tara reade, and swam naked in front of female secret service agents. Two bad choices in the morality department, for sure, but if you have to choose, one is a socialist trying to destroy the country and the other is anti-socialist and wants a second crack and draining the swamp. Still crappy choices, but should be an easy one to make if you have to chose one.

For speaker Johnson, why is it not possible to speak out about the obvious political persecution, election interference, and Marxist tactics being deployed against the anti-socialist/anti-communist candidate without getting dragged into the morality of adultery? They're trying to imprison the regime's political opposition during an election year due to an immaterial account coding error or omission from several years ago, placing gag orders on the former POTUS, etc. This is just another example in a long line of gravely serious Marxist tactics used by bureaucrats and democrats in the last 6 years that indicate we no longer have a democracy at all, barely even an illusion of one. The Speaker should be able to speak on it without getting tied to adultery with a porn star. Why can't he? Oh, because Liz Cheney is a POS.

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

Can you quote where Johnson was supporting Trump's immorality specifically since that is where you went initially?

What's worse…Joe Biden showering with his teenage daughter in what Ashley describes as probably molestation in her own diary, or Trump sleeping with a porn star?

Our presidential candidates everyone. Welcome to clown world USA.

Kyle Field Shade Chaser said:

---

What's worse…Joe Biden showering with his teenage daughter in what Ashley describes as probably molestation in her own diary, or Trump sleeping with a porn star?

Our presidential candidates everyone. Welcome to clown world USA.

---

Ummmm…incest. Incest is always worse.

Guy really came in here and asked if engaging in infidelity with a consenting adult is on the same level as sexually assaulting a minor. That's something.

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

Trump is reportedly a cad as well as many other politicians. And we have some women pols that are sleaze buckets. But keep harping on one side only as you are wont.

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

As usual, you try and shift the topic so you can virtue signal and start a game of moral relativism. Johnson was speaking to the lawlessness of the court, not Trump or Trumps behavior. Try a little harder.

bobbranco said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

Trump is reportedly a cad as well as many other politicians. And we have some women pols that are sleaze buckets. But keep harping on one side only as you are wont.

---

Just making sure you were good with sleaze buckets in general. Apparently its all good as long as we don't have more than the Dems.

My mistake....thought we wanted to be better. This country is screwed.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

As usual, you try and shift the topic so you can virtue signal and start a game of moral relativism. Johnson was speaking to the lawlessness of the court, not Trump or Trumps behavior. Try a little harder.

---

Funny...Didn't see him at the other trials. If holding our reps to the standard that proclaim to have on morality is virtue signaling...then your right. Rationalize a little harder.

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

Trump is reportedly a cad as well as many other politicians. And we have some women pols that are sleaze buckets. But keep harping on one side only as you are wont.

---

Just making sure you were good with sleaze buckets in general. Apparently its all good as long as we don't have more than the Dems.

My mistake....thought we wanted to be better. This country is screwed.

---

World is full of sinners. And we have choices. Are you a team player or do you want to score goals for your opponent instead?

Fenrir said:

---

Can you quote where Johnson was supporting Trump's immorality specifically since that is where you went initially?

---

Can you show me where Johnson was championing Trump in front of his other trials. Since he wasn't, your comment assumes that either A) Johnson only sees this trial as a miscarriage of justice and doesn't believe Trump diddled SD or B) thinks the other trials have enough merit they didn't warrant his intervention.

Johnson is there bc Trump forced him...as I said initially. I don't believe Johnson believes in being there.

bobbranco said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

Trump is reportedly a cad as well as many other politicians. And we have some women pols that are sleaze buckets. But keep harping on one side only as you are wont.

---

Just making sure you were good with sleaze buckets in general. Apparently its all good as long as we don't have more than the Dems.

My mistake....thought we wanted to be better. This country is screwed.

---

World is full of sinners. And we have choices. Are you a team player or do you want to kick the ball into your goal instead?

---

If team player means not calling out their bs...then no I"m not. I've voted for Trump before and will again but not because we really have choices in this election. You're right...the world is full of sinners, so lets justify their sin bc we hope they'll do what we expect them too politically. Forget kicking the ball....we're kicking the morality can down the road and we'll just say it was justified. But you go ahead and be a good team player and don't say anything bad about the team. Go along to get along. Seems there are folks who are cool with the means justifying what we hope are the ends we are pursuing.

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

Trump is reportedly a cad as well as many other politicians. And we have some women pols that are sleaze buckets. But keep harping on one side only as you are wont.

---

Just making sure you were good with sleaze buckets in general. Apparently its all good as long as we don't have more than the Dems.

My mistake....thought we wanted to be better. This country is screwed.

---

World is full of sinners. And we have choices. Are you a team player or do you want to kick the ball into your goal instead?

---

If team player means not calling out their bs...then no I"m not. I've voted for Trump before and will again but not because we really have choices in this election. You're right...the world is full of sinners, so lets justify their sin bc we hope they'll do what we expect them too politically. Forget kicking the ball....we're kicking the morality can down the road and we'll just say it was justified. But you go ahead and be a good team player and don't say anything bad about the team. Go along to get along. Seems there are folks who are cool with the means justifying what we hope are the ends we are pursuing.

---

Fair enough. Life is not fair. It takes too much time and effort to catalog the recriminations. I also am not justifying anything by a vote for Trump except for voting for the lesser of two evils.

BluHorseShu said:

---

Fenrir said:

---

Can you quote where Johnson was supporting Trump's immorality specifically since that is where you went initially?

---

Can you show me where Johnson was championing Trump in front of his other trials. Since he wasn't, your comment assumes that either A) Johnson only sees this trial as a miscarriage of justice and doesn't believe Trump diddled SD or B) thinks the other trials have enough merit they didn't warrant his intervention.

Johnson is there bc Trump forced him...as I said initially. I don't believe Johnson believes in being there.

---

Yeah, that's a hell of a false dilemma you have there. If Johnson doesn't defend Trump at every step he cannot step in at any point and claim that this is being pursued because Trump is the left's challenger in the upcoming election or else he is actually just defending Trump's immorality?

Where in his statement was he defending Trump's immorality? That's a simple question. You made the claim, I'm sure you have sufficient support for it.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

You can defend the Biden crime family better than this.

---

Pretty lame reply. How in the world is that even remotely defending the Biden family? Is this really your best intellectual response? Because Trump has paid for sex and I disagree with Johnson making a show of defending him...that make me a defender of the Biden family.

This is why I give other conservatives here grief. Do we need one more person commenting on how bad the Biden's are? I disagree with what Johnson did....Please explain how that possibly make me a liberal or defender of the Bidens. I guess some here are only for morality when its digging at the other side.

Or was this just a clever response because some stars were needed today?

You can defend people who pay for sex better than this.

---

As usual, you try and shift the topic so you can virtue signal and start a game of moral relativism. Johnson was speaking to the lawlessness of the court, not Trump or Trumps behavior. Try a little harder.

---

lunatic TDS-infected communists have made it up in their heads that while Trump is on trial for an immaterial felony account coding error in his company years ago, he's FORCING people to speak out against it.

oh no said:

---

lunatic TDS-infected communists have made it up in their heads that while Trump is on trial for an immaterial felony account coding error in his company years ago, he's FORCING people to speak out against it.

---

And lunatic TDS sycophants have made it up in their heads that republicans can't support Trump in instances like this for no other reason than they really believe he's a good innocent guy who's just try to make America great. People only pay attention to what's happening now and don't recall anything beyond 5 minutes ago like when Trump is telling the Speaker how to direct the house to vote and then kowtow to him.

I'm sure you put alot of thought into the 'communists' quip...but explain to the rest of us how not liking Trump makes anyone a communist? Lots of people, including myself, abhor Trump ....it has nothing to do with with being conservative or the fact that we'll still cast a vote for him because a sh$t sandwich with mustard is better than just a plain sh$t sandwich.

People generally like team players.

'Teammates' that complain all the time are the worst.

damiond said:

---

Have to admit I’m surprised that @SpeakerJohnson wants to be in the “I cheated on my wife with a porn star” club. I guess he’s not that concerned with teaching morality to our young people after all. https://t.co/wTHWvA1m85

— Liz Cheney (@Liz_Cheney) May 14, 2024

this nasty woman should be in jail with the unselect committee for suppressing evidence that exonerates trump

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

5 minutes ago like when Trump is telling the Speaker how to direct the house to vote and then kowtow to him.

---

Yet another thing made up in sick peoples' heads. Did your Pravda tell you this happened? This didn't happen.

Quote:

---

I'm sure you put alot of thought into the 'communists' quip...but explain to the rest of us how not liking Trump makes anyone a communist? Lots of people, including myself, abhor Trump ....it has nothing to do with with being conservative or the fact that we'll still cast a vote for him because a sh$t sandwich with mustard is better than just a plain sh$t sandwich.

---

There are two choices; the empty suit figurehead of the Marxist regime in power, and the other guy. The other guy by default is the anti-communist candidate. You can dislike Trump all you want. I don't like his blustering narcissistic unstatesmanlike commentary. I don't like that he already failed at draining the swamp before or the massive spending on covid relief in the last year of his presidency. But the choice should still be easy if these are the only two choices and you're not a communist or brainwashed by Pravda. Call it a **** sandwich with mustard if you want, but even abstaining from exercising your right to vote because you don't like either is a vote for the Marxist regime.

Does being referred to as a communist offend you, blu hor? Why are you communist (or socialist, which is a precursor to communism)?

Democrats are the big government, national social programs, nationalized health care, tax-raising, poverty-inducing party. That's socialist-leaning and they always have been.

Communists need to control the media so they control the messaging, like the Soviets did with state-run Pravda as the only news in their country. Propaganda focusing the masses on a hoax, propaganda riling up social unrest with no regard for facts, statistics, or logic. Pravda ignoring real news about their regime's corruption so the masses don't even know about it and instead focus on a journal entry coding in a company several years ago as the real threat. That's the left here with near full control of msm, tech platform monopolies, Hollywood, etc. Communists control the means of production. Production in USA now is largely in tech and big tech monopolies and democrats have been scissoring for two decades now. Free speech is a huge threat to communism. It helps if they can tell a tech monopoly like amazon to shut down the servers of a company they don't like, or tell alphabet or meta to censor and ban opinions they don't like or even ban their political opposition from communicating on their platforms. Leave all the smut and kink porn, leave all the ayatollahs and middle eastern terrorists screaming "death to America" on your platforms, but please, censor those conservatives. They want smaller government. That's a real threat to the regime.

Communists need to infect the youth and turn them against the traditional systems, like Mao did in the color revolution. Focus them on frivolous issues like their gender or the importance of baby murdering "rights" so that they are totally oblivious to the full control of big government that they're voting for or their poverty-inducing spending and inflation. Own academia so the state can control the kids and not families. Keeping secrets from parents, absence of god, absence of family, full indoctrination by the state. This is you, democrats.

Communists need everyone to bend the knee to the state and depend on the state. Religions and strong men are a threat to the state as people may hold something higher and be more loyal to them than the state. It's the left that has all but removed God and families/ dads from our society, tries to infiltrate the church as "extremists", punitively punishes religious people for being against baby murdering while ignoring real violence across our cities.

Communists need the plebes in their citizenry to depend on the state. It's the socialist welfare state free loaders whose ballots they need to assume power and expanding that base with rewards for contributing nothing to society is their ticket. So is importing millions and millions of the poorest people Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, etc. have to offer. So is raising taxes on the few people that still earn or produce enough to pay taxes to fund the government (only 40% of us left). So is devaluing the currency intentionally by massive printing and spending and attacking the energy industry because creating inflation creates more government-dependent impoverished socialist voters for them. That's you, democrats.

Communists need to "redistribute" the wealth, for equity, a common democrat slogan. Democrats are allowing violence in our streets and letting criminals go free because we need equity in our prison population. Democrats are making sure superficial things like skin color determine who gets the job, who gets the scholarship, etc. in the name of equity and at the risk of quality and safety when less-qualified people are placed in key positions. Everything is about equity. Equity, equity, equity. Redistribute. That's communist.

Communists need to disarm their citizens so any possible uprising or resistance to the regime is easier to control and suppress. Hmmm.. I wonder why democrats give zero Fs about the gang bang gat shootings in our cities everyday, when removing Chicago and 2-3 other cities statistically makes USA go from one of the most dangerous countries on earth to one of the safest, and yet they only focus on banning certain types of rifles?

Marxist communists use division as a means of controlling the population. Intentional division based on superficial b.s. like skin color is straight out of Karl Marx's playbook. At a time when black people were executives and board members, appointed to high ranking positions, becoming wealthy entrepreneurs, at unprecedented levels, at a time when interracial marriages and mixed race children were at unprecedented levels, when we're getting damn close to colorblind, one incident with one criminal thug divides and burns our cities down. That's the left and their Pravda media arm.

Marxists seize control of election processes so the results can be predetermined. As Joe Biden and Joe Stalin both said, it's not who votes, it's who counts the votes. It is not racist voter suppression to be against mass-mailed ballots without traceable or vouch-able chains of custody, without signature verification, from insecure and outdated registration rolls where an ID and proof of citizenship and residency wasn't even required to register. Being for those things is actually being for a Marxist regime, rather than being against them = "racist voter suppression". That's the democrats.

Marxists pack court benches with their agents. Not only can they dismiss credible cases and claim there's no standing, but Marxists can find a crime for anyone they don't like that might be a threat. There were cases about legitimate election concerns in Fidel's Cuba and Hugo's Venezuela that were immediately dismissed by judges, too. Clarence Thomas is guilty of being an originalist constitutionalist. Donald Trump is guilty of becoming too popular with anti-communist views, like making an enormous government full of unelected permanent government bureaucrats smaller. These are threats. Find some crimes somewhere and punish them. That's the democrats.

Marxists will seek ways to provide themselves with eternal control. Democrats openly talk about ending the filibuster, something they've used the most when it helped them before they had power. Democrats openly talk about adding DC and PR as states for eternal power in the Senate that ratifies laws and approves the regime's nominees. Democrats openly talk about ending the Electoral College so that flyover country and suburbs no longer have a voice in national elections and only the left coast and big city communists control every national election. Democrats openly talk about expanding and packing the Supreme Court so they can legislate from the bench, because originalists who believe in the constitution are a threat to getting more Marxist control. Democrats openly talk about "reimagining" policing, which can only lead to replacing local beat cops with federal employees, expanding the regime's KGB/FBI. Nationalizing = communist = democrats.

Anyone is welcome to be a Marxist communist if they want. Just embrace it. Tell us why it's going to work so well here. I personally think the democrats' ambition is to be like China, but they're following Venezuela's blueprint and we're ****ed.

still no defense from communist on why they are communist.

communist posters scatter like roaches when a light is shined on them ..but come out boldly in droves on the hush money trial thread now that the regime's political opponent is a convicted felon because an accountant at his company 8 years ago coded an invoice from an attorney to the "Legal Fees" account.

It's really something to witness. A bunch of children gleefully running around like chickens with their heads cut off with absolutely zero clue on the ramifications.

i guess communists get too bored or too busy trolling other threads

oh no said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

5 minutes ago like when Trump is telling the Speaker how to direct the house to vote and then kowtow to him.

---

Yet another thing made up in sick peoples' heads. Did your Pravda tell you this happened? This didn't happen.

Quote:

---

I'm sure you put alot of thought into the 'communists' quip...but explain to the rest of us how not liking Trump makes anyone a communist? Lots of people, including myself, abhor Trump ....it has nothing to do with with being conservative or the fact that we'll still cast a vote for him because a sh$t sandwich with mustard is better than just a plain sh$t sandwich.

---

There are two choices; the empty suit figurehead of the Marxist regime in power, and the other guy. The other guy by default is the anti-communist candidate. You can dislike Trump all you want. I don't like his blustering narcissistic unstatesmanlike commentary. I don't like that he already failed at draining the swamp before or the massive spending on covid relief in the last year of his presidency. But the choice should still be easy if these are the only two choices and you're not a communist or brainwashed by Pravda. Call it a **** sandwich with mustard if you want, but even abstaining from exercising your right to vote because you don't like either is a vote for the Marxist regime.

Does being referred to as a communist offend you, blu hor? Why are you communist (or socialist, which is a precursor to communism)?

Democrats are the big government, national social programs, nationalized health care, tax-raising, poverty-inducing party. That's socialist-leaning and they always have been.

Communists need to control the media so they control the messaging, like the Soviets did with state-run Pravda as the only news in their country. Propaganda focusing the masses on a hoax, propaganda riling up social unrest with no regard for facts, statistics, or logic. Pravda ignoring real news about their regime's corruption so the masses don't even know about it and instead focus on a journal entry coding in a company several years ago as the real threat. That's the left here with near full control of msm, tech platform monopolies, Hollywood, etc. Communists control the means of production. Production in USA now is largely in tech and big tech monopolies and democrats have been scissoring for two decades now. Free speech is a huge threat to communism. It helps if they can tell a tech monopoly like amazon to shut down the servers of a company they don't like, or tell alphabet or meta to censor and ban opinions they don't like or even ban their political opposition from communicating on their platforms. Leave all the smut and kink porn, leave all the ayatollahs and middle eastern terrorists screaming "death to America" on your platforms, but please, censor those conservatives. They want smaller government. That's a real threat to the regime.

Communists need to infect the youth and turn them against the traditional systems, like Mao did in the color revolution. Focus them on frivolous issues like their gender or the importance of baby murdering "rights" so that they are totally oblivious to the full control of big government that they're voting for or their poverty-inducing spending and inflation. Own academia so the state can control the kids and not families. Keeping secrets from parents, absence of god, absence of family, full indoctrination by the state. This is you, democrats.

Communists need everyone to bend the knee to the state and depend on the state. Religions and strong men are a threat to the state as people may hold something higher and be more loyal to them than the state. It's the left that has all but removed God and families/ dads from our society, tries to infiltrate the church as "extremists", punitively punishes religious people for being against baby murdering while ignoring real violence across our cities.

Communists need the plebes in their citizenry to depend on the state. It's the socialist welfare state free loaders whose ballots they need to assume power and expanding that base with rewards for contributing nothing to society is their ticket. So is importing millions and millions of the poorest people Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, etc. have to offer. So is raising taxes on the few people that still earn or produce enough to pay taxes to fund the government (only 40% of us left). So is devaluing the currency intentionally by massive printing and spending and attacking the energy industry because creating inflation creates more government-dependent impoverished socialist voters for them. That's you, democrats.

Communists need to "redistribute" the wealth, for equity, a common democrat slogan. Democrats are allowing violence in our streets and letting criminals go free because we need equity in our prison population. Democrats are making sure superficial things like skin color determine who gets the job, who gets the scholarship, etc. in the name of equity and at the risk of quality and safety when less-qualified people are placed in key positions. Everything is about equity. Equity, equity, equity. Redistribute. That's communist.

Communists need to disarm their citizens so any possible uprising or resistance to the regime is easier to control and suppress. Hmmm.. I wonder why democrats give zero Fs about the gang bang gat shootings in our cities everyday, when removing Chicago and 2-3 other cities statistically makes USA go from one of the most dangerous countries on earth to one of the safest, and yet they only focus on banning certain types of rifles?

Marxist communists use division as a means of controlling the population. Intentional division based on superficial b.s. like skin color is straight out of Karl Marx's playbook. At a time when black people were executives and board members, appointed to high ranking positions, becoming wealthy entrepreneurs, at unprecedented levels, at a time when interracial marriages and mixed race children were at unprecedented levels, when we're getting damn close to colorblind, one incident with one criminal thug divides and burns our cities down. That's the left and their Pravda media arm.

Marxists seize control of election processes so the results can be predetermined. As Joe Biden and Joe Stalin both said, it's not who votes, it's who counts the votes. It is not racist voter suppression to be against mass-mailed ballots without traceable or vouch-able chains of custody, without signature verification, from insecure and outdated registration rolls where an ID and proof of citizenship and residency wasn't even required to register. Being for those things is actually being for a Marxist regime, rather than being against them = "racist voter suppression". That's the democrats.

Marxists pack court benches with their agents. Not only can they dismiss credible cases and claim there's no standing, but Marxists can find a crime for anyone they don't like that might be a threat. There were cases about legitimate election concerns in Fidel's Cuba and Hugo's Venezuela that were immediately dismissed by judges, too. Clarence Thomas is guilty of being an originalist constitutionalist. Donald Trump is guilty of becoming too popular with anti-communist views, like making an enormous government full of unelected permanent government bureaucrats smaller. These are threats. Find some crimes somewhere and punish them. That's the democrats.

Marxists will seek ways to provide themselves with eternal control. Democrats openly talk about ending the filibuster, something they've used the most when it helped them before they had power. Democrats openly talk about adding DC and PR as states for eternal power in the Senate that ratifies laws and approves the regime's nominees. Democrats openly talk about ending the Electoral College so that flyover country and suburbs no longer have a voice in national elections and only the left coast and big city communists control every national election. Democrats openly talk about expanding and packing the Supreme Court so they can legislate from the bench, because originalists who believe in the constitution are a threat to getting more Marxist control. Democrats openly talk about "reimagining" policing, which can only lead to replacing local beat cops with federal employees, expanding the regime's KGB/FBI. Nationalizing = communist = democrats.

Anyone is welcome to be a Marxist communist if they want. Just embrace it. Tell us why it's going to work so well here. I personally think the democrats' ambition is to be like China, but they're following Venezuela's blueprint and we're ****ed.

---