Owlagdad said:

---

Can we bus loads of republicans to Arizona on election day?

---

You don't need people. All you need is a bunch of blank mail ballots and names of non-voters. That's literally all it takes to swing a state.

There is also no way to catch multiple mail ballots with same name. Pretty crazy how broken it is.

normaleagle05 said:

---

Y'all need to read deeper than the OP. Not sure if the law cited on the AZ SOS's site has gone into effect or not, but it is harsh on non-citizens trying to register and vote in federal elections.

This doesn't seem to be what is portrayed after any independent reading.

ETA that the text of that bill is in their revised statutes.

---

**** those non-citizens. You wanna vote for President? You better be a ****ing American.

Road trip to Az!

BlueTaze said:

---

Owlagdad said:

---

Can we bus loads of republicans to Arizona on election day?

---

You don't need people. All you need is a bunch of blank mail ballots and names of non-voters. That's literally all it takes to swing a state.

There is also no way to catch multiple mail ballots with same name. Pretty crazy how broken it is.

---

According to their website, Runbeck could catch that, if they wanted to do so.

captkirk said:

---

---

What is the Trump "campaign" doing about this?

I put "campaign" in quotes because as Charlie Kirk points out, all the money has gone to Trump's legal bills and there are ZERO local district offices.

Biden has 425 local district offices for his campaign.

but as always- who could have seen this coming?

AgBQ-00 said:

---

And now you are seeing why the 3/5ths compromise was a thing. Dems wanted to count slaves as population in order to gain more representatives in the legislature, otherwise they would leave/start a war and destroy the Union. Now they have set it up for illegals to count both as population and have the vote. They are running the same playbook with a little added distraction pre-snap.

---

1. The Dems didn't create the 3/5ths Compromise.
2. The 3/5ths Compromise was created to create the Union.

Please tell me this is a bot post.

you are correct. I had my time line off. But the point stands that in order to have the slave states (later democrats) remain as part of the bourgeoning nation there had to be a compromise about representation. Previously the slave states wanted them to not count because of tax obligations. Then in the Constitutional debate they wanted them to count in order to gain representation. It is the same thing today with illegals.

At this point, we might as well just go back to the old feudal style of government. At least you know who will be the boss, and you know that corruption won't attempt to be hidden amongst the royals. Us serfs can just toil in the fields and pay our grainery taxes, everybody will be happy.

AgBQ-00 said:

---

you are correct. I had my time line off. But the point stands that in order to have the slave states (later democrats) remain as part of the bourgeoning nation there had to be a compromise about representation. Previously the slave states wanted them to not count because of tax obligations. Then in the Constitutional debate they wanted them to count in order to gain representation. It is the same thing today with illegals.

---

Please stop blaming this on the Democrats. It's just foolish.

No, I don't think I will. The states that less than a generation later would all be democrat were the ones that fought for and required there to be a disproportionate amount of representation based off of their slave population. The fact that it bothers you so much that the modern day plantation owners are using the same tactic shows how close to home the point hits for the party that relies on it.

AgBQ-00 said:

---

No, I don't think I will. The states that less than a generation later would all be democrat were the ones that fought for and required there to be a disproportionate amount of representation based off of their slave population. The fact that it bothers you so much that the modern day plantation owners are using the same tactic shows how close to home the point hits for the party that relies on it.

---

It bothers me because it's ****ty history.

Hang around the polls wearing this jacket.