There's a case to be made that Justice Thomas should have recused given his wife, Ginni Thomas's, role pushing the Big Lie which led to the insurrection.
— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) April 16, 2024
At the least, it raises questions about his impartiality. https://t.co/RxPonk0BXu
The situation involving Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Ginni Thomas, who had involvement in the events surrounding January 6, indeed adds a layer of complexity to how the public and legal analysts might perceive his actions on the bench. Ginni Thomas's actions, which…
— P a u l ◉ (@ybarrap) April 16, 2024
Ginni Thomas was directly involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
— Robert Reich (@RBReich) April 16, 2024
Yet Clarence Thomas didn't recuse himself from arguments today in a case about the January 6 insurrection.
How is this not a scandal of epic proportions?
all the right pigs are squealing
"If allowed to stand, the lower court’s decision will only reward and incentivize politically motivated uses of ill-fitting criminal statutes with harsh penalties."https://t.co/GquCeeb9yI
— Douglass Mackey (@DougMackeyCase) April 16, 2024
leftists love their lawfare