Police take custody of E. Jean Carroll's unlicensed gun for "safekeepng"?

2,762 Views | 22 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Slicer97
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Police in New York took possession of a gun belonging to writer E. Jean Carroll in February after she said during testimony in her defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump that she had an unlicensed firearm at home, according to a police report obtained by NBC News.

The chief of police in Warwick, New York, visited Carroll at her home on Feb. 15 "to discuss some open issues," the report states, including Carroll's disclosure of the handgun while she was on the witness stand Jan. 17.

During the second day of the civil trial, Carroll had told the federal court in lower Manhattan that she kept a "high standard revolver, nine chambers" at home with ammunition. "By my bed," she said.
"I still do not have a license," Carroll added.

John Rader, the reporting officer, said in his report that he "offered to secure the weapon at the police station's property for safekeeping."
No charges despite NY law making possession of an unlicensed firearm a felony.

Quote:

Under New York state law, a person can be found guilty of criminal possession if they possess a firearm, such as a pistol, that has not been registered. The felony carries a maximum sentence of four years.
Aaaand now for the capper.

Quote:

Carroll and a member of her security team surrendered the gun a day after Rader visited, and the firearm was being held until Carroll receives a New York pistol license, the report said.
LINK

She is a loon. Has a security team now. How can she qualify for a license?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's good to be a white liberal female.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

It's good to be a white liberal female.
The NY Loon Du Jour gets special treatment and I ain't talking about waterfowl.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry, I won't be a hypocrite. She a class "A" C U Next Tuesday and a lier, but shall not be infringed.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gotta love our 2 tier "discretionary" justice system!

Friend of the Regime? Member of a Demographic that's super loyal to The Regime? No charges for you no matter what you did!

Enemy of the Regime? Member of a demographic disloyal to The Regime? Breathe wrong and we'll keep making up new phony Lawfare charges until we can put you away for years, confiscate your property and ruin your life!

It's like living in a real, actual, corrupt 3rd world hellhole!

Way to go Joe!
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cool…but you understand the point is that if Trump confessed to having a unregistered fire arm then NY would be adding another felony charge against him rather than choosing to overlook it as payment for lying on the stand to take down an enemy of The Regime right?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RGLAG85 said:

Sorry, I won't be a hypocrite. She a class "A" C U Next Tuesday and a lier, but shall not be infringed.
In New York state? They have strict gun laws and she was in knowing violation of them as she testified under oath.
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What gun has nine chambers?

All I got is a Heritage .22 piece of crap or the black powder LeMats a personal favorite of JEB Stuart?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gotta be some kind of .22 revolver.

I've found a few others that hold 9. Most are cheap junk brands.

I doubt if she actually went to a gun store that is the kind of gun they'd sell her for protection so it is probably some old old gun from a company that doesn't even exist anymore.

Of course, as dumb as she is, who knows if the description is even correct.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
RogerFurlong
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RGLAG85 said:

Sorry, I won't be a hypocrite. She a class "A" C U Next Tuesday and a lier, but shall not be infringed.

Best way to get rid of bad laws is to enforce them
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She committed a felony and is rewarded with a firearm license?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

She committed a felony and is rewarded with a firearm license?
Exactly.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

B-1 83 said:

She committed a felony and is rewarded with a firearm license?
Exactly.


Yup

You know a place is lost when the government has such total control that they don't fear the voter and being openly corrupt anymore
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A felon shouldn't be able to get a gun. E. Jean Carroll, Hunter Biden, and who else is it (D)ifferent for?
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did she purchase using the supposed 'gun show loophole?'
LeonardSkinner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The deadliest weapon in New York with multiple chambers is the state judicial system.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

RGLAG85 said:

Sorry, I won't be a hypocrite. She a class "A" C U Next Tuesday and a lier, but shall not be infringed.
In New York state? They have strict gun laws and she was in knowing violation of them as she testified under oath.
I get it. But their laws are unconstitutional. They need to be challenged and struck down.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

Cool…but you understand the point is that if Trump confessed to having a unregistered fire arm then NY would be adding another felony charge against him rather than choosing to overlook it as payment for lying on the stand to take down an enemy of The Regime right?
Again, as above, I get that as well, and that would also be unconstitutional. No matter how vile she is, and she's vile, she and Trump should be protected against the laws and be able to protect themselves.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RGLAG85 said:

aggiehawg said:

RGLAG85 said:

Sorry, I won't be a hypocrite. She a class "A" C U Next Tuesday and a lier, but shall not be infringed.
In New York state? They have strict gun laws and she was in knowing violation of them as she testified under oath.
I get it. But their laws are unconstitutional. They need to be challenged and struck down.
They have been struck down but also upheld. A license requirement, if not overly restrictive or discriminatory can pass muster.
aggiejayrod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

Cool…but you understand the point is that if Trump confessed to having a unregistered fire arm then NY would be adding another felony charge against him rather than choosing to overlook it as payment for lying on the stand to take down an enemy of The Regime right?


If a Democrat pulled a gun and Trump kicked the gun out of the democrats hand, NY would charge him for unlawful possession for the 0.5 seconds he "possessed" while it touched his foot. And Jack smith would update his insurrection charges in DC to include possessing a firearm to retroactively incite an insurrection
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

She is a loon. Has a security team now. How can she qualify for a license?


I must be reading this wrong. It's almost like you are saying that if you have a security team, you should not be allowed to have a firearm.

I don't think that is what you mean, though.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

aggiehawg said:

She is a loon. Has a security team now. How can she qualify for a license?


I must be reading this wrong. It's almost like you are saying that if you have a security team, you should not be allowed to have a firearm.

I don't think that is what you mean, though.
I forgot to say "Plus, how can she qualify for a license," since she's admitted to committing a felony under NY gun laws.

But you raise a good point, who is paying for her security team? She said she wasn't making much money.

ETA: A SCOTUS decision in 2022 struck down the "need" requirement for a concealed carry permit, not that she would be applying for that with a security team. But she should have to have a mental evaluation before even be granted a license to own one.
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1) No adult that hasn't been convicted of a violent felony should need a license to possess a firearm.

2) If this woman were a conservative or Team Trump, she would be in custody as well as her firearm.

Dems: If they didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all. Despicable people.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.