This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

Knife in the back of the conservative voters. I hope they all go broke and suffer great failures in future endeavors if they're going to pull crap like this.

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

are the washington generals a real basketball team?

we have a uniparty with the allusion of choice.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Knife in the back of the conservative voters. I hope they all go broke and suffer great failures in future endeavors if they're going to pull crap like this.

---

It seems like there is some big money, behind the scenes nefarious crap going on. I wonder if these guys are being induced to retire early by wealthy globalist/lib entities. I wouldn't put it past Soros or people like him to simply start paying Republicans to retire via perfectly legal means. Barring a health or family emergency, I can't understand just leaving your party and your constituency in the lurch like this if there wasn't an extremely lucrative benefit.

Make no mistake, it's not just the House. We have 3 or 5 senators pondering flipping to the communist side this summer because they can't stand the idea of America being put first again.

Those damn voters must be stopped.

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Who cares, any decent bills R pass WILL NOT GET A VOTE IN THE SENATE.

samurai_science said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Who cares, any decent bills R pass WILL NOT GET A VOTE IN THE SENATE.

---

Yes, but the inverse is the problem. The Republicans could at least stop stupid **** from happening.

Now, they may even lose that ability and if they do all bets are off for this country.

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

The Uniparty is alive and active !

"Big Paydays"- goes to show you these scum are bought and paid for.
Not citizen statesmen, but money grabbers.

samurai_science said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Who cares, any decent bills R pass WILL NOT GET A VOTE IN THE SENATE.

---

I guess you never got passed playing checkers, huh?

The implications of loosing the House majority leads to losing committee heads, loss of subpoena power and lets the Democrats write a law preventing Trump from being president because they will convict him of insurrection.

Not only are these guys RINOs they are traitors to their party and oath!

What is the uniparty thing I see pop up here and there?

VitruvianAg said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Who cares, any decent bills R pass WILL NOT GET A VOTE IN THE SENATE.

---

I guess you never got passed playing checkers, huh?

The implications of loosing the House majority leads to losing committee heads, loss of subpoena power and lets the Democrats write a law preventing Trump from being president because they will convict him of insurrection.

Not only are these guys RINOs they are traitors to their party and oath!

---

Having a smaller majority is not losing the majority. Start a thread when that happens.

He made his millions, and has no backbone to battle for his voters. Good fkn riddance.

His hate for Trump and his lack of caring for actual Americans makes him just like a democrat. Go figure.

Charpie said:

---

What is the uniparty thing I see pop up here and there?

---

It's a lazy conspiracy theory that assumes all Republicans and Democrats are actually the same when convenient, and that differences between the parties are just theatrics. Throw the theory out when Republican politicians impotently yell about something for a cool soundbite, though.

Charpie said:

---

What is the uniparty thing I see pop up here and there?

---

I won't even explain it ….

I for one am more than satisfied to get rid of these enemies within. The Repbublican Party needs a good purging of all these pansy a** RINOs. It's the only way a conservative agenda will ever be remotely possible.

You cannot have turncoats that aren't dependable when it comes to nutcracking time. We need real conservatives that have a backbone.

I want to see what has happened in Florida happen on a national level. I don't know if it is possible, but what have Republicans got to lose at this point?

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Yup. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Sensible folk realize how degenerate it is to provide upstanding individuals like MTG a bullhorn. A root cause is the party's pandering to fringe elements. This happens to the D party too. AOC, etc

samurai_science said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Who cares, any decent bills R pass WILL NOT GET A VOTE IN THE SENATE.

---

I guess you never got passed playing checkers, huh?

The implications of loosing the House majority leads to losing committee heads, loss of subpoena power and lets the Democrats write a law preventing Trump from being president because they will convict him of insurrection.

Not only are these guys RINOs they are traitors to their party and oath!

---

Having a smaller majority is not losing the majority. Start a thread when that happens.

---

If the Republicans lose two more Congressman (five are threatening) we lose the majority, how do you like the sound of Speaker Hakeem Jeffries?

Ag87H2O said:

---

I for one am more than satisfied to get rid of these enemies within. The Repbublican Party needs a good purging of all these pansy a** RINOs. It's the only way a conservative agenda will ever be remotely possible.

You cannot have turncoats that aren't dependable when it comes to nutcracking time. We need real conservatives that have a backbone.

I want to see what has happened in Florida happen on a national level. I don't know if it is possible, but what have Republicans got to lose at this point?

---

Yes, please replace all moderate R's with MTG types. Signed, Nancy Pelosi

This thread reeks of "moderates".

C@LAg said:

---

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

This thread reaks of "moderates".

---

reeks

---

Edited. Thanks.

C@LAg said:

---

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

This thread reaks of "moderates".

---

reeks

---

Edited. Thanks.

---

---

Perfect gif. Lol.

txwxman said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Yup. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Sensible folk realize how degenerate it is to provide upstanding individuals like MTG a bullhorn. A root cause is the party's pandering to fringe elements. This happens to the D party too. AOC, etc

---

You're "sensible" because you prefer spineless people representing you. That's really admirable.

txwxman said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Yup. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Sensible folk realize how degenerate it is to provide upstanding individuals like MTG a bullhorn. A root cause is the party's pandering to fringe elements. This happens to the D party too. AOC, etc

---

I would take a Lauren Boebert loudmouth, with her voting record, over a moderate Republican any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Give me an annoying loudmouth, that fights for conservative policy, over a bunch of p**sy moderates that compromise with the left at every turn.

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

txwxman said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

This did not need to happen if the GOP was a serious party.

---

Yup. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Sensible folk realize how degenerate it is to provide upstanding individuals like MTG a bullhorn. A root cause is the party's pandering to fringe elements. This happens to the D party too. AOC, etc

---

I would take a Lauren Boebert loudmouth, with her voting record, over a moderate Republican any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Give me an annoying loudmouth, that fights for conservative policy, over a bunch of p**sy moderates that compromise with the left at every turn.

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

Charpie said:

---

What is the uniparty thing I see pop up here and there?

---

It's a lazy conspiracy theory that assumes all Republicans and Democrats are actually the same when convenient, and that differences between the parties are just theatrics. Throw the theory out when Republican politicians impotently yell about something for a cool soundbite, though.

---

The classic "muh conspiracy". I guess the Mitt Romney's and John McCain's of the world that would rather work with democrats than conservatives in their own party is just a conspiracy.

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

Charpie said:

---

What is the uniparty thing I see pop up here and there?

---

It's a lazy conspiracy theory that assumes all Republicans and Democrats are actually the same when convenient, and that differences between the parties are just theatrics. Throw the theory out when Republican politicians impotently yell about something for a cool soundbite, though.

---

The classic "muh conspiracy". I guess the Mitt Romney's and John McCain's of the world that would rather work with democrats than conservatives in their own party is just a conspiracy.

---

This just in: purple states exist, and politicians have to cater to a purple audience.

Also, sometimes there are red states with a blue senator, such as West Virginia, and that senator cannot go along with the Democrat party line all the time.

This "muh uniparty" idea is a lazy, ridiculous, overly simplified explanation of how things work.

Buck is a gutless liberal, just like Romney. Buck can go back to Colorado and wear a dress.

Waffledynamics said:

---

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

Charpie said:

---

What is the uniparty thing I see pop up here and there?

---

It's a lazy conspiracy theory that assumes all Republicans and Democrats are actually the same when convenient, and that differences between the parties are just theatrics. Throw the theory out when Republican politicians impotently yell about something for a cool soundbite, though.

---

The classic "muh conspiracy". I guess the Mitt Romney's and John McCain's of the world that would rather work with democrats than conservatives in their own party is just a conspiracy.

---

This just in: purple states exist, and politicians have to cater to a purple audience.

Also, sometimes there are red states with a blue senator, such as West Virginia, and that senator cannot go along with the Democrat party line all the time.

This "muh uniparty" idea is a lazy, ridiculous, overly simplified explanation of how things work.

---

No it is not a lazy explanation. Too many republican representatives have ran on conservative policies and then done the complete opposite. It's funny that you bring up Joe Manchine like it means a damn thing. He will vote along with the republicans when it doesn't matter and go full blown democrat when they need the vote for something terrible.

Outside that piece of trash, what democrat is someone that will vote with the republicans?

Waffledynamics said:

---

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

Charpie said:

---

What is the uniparty thing I see pop up here and there?

---

It's a lazy conspiracy theory that assumes all Republicans and Democrats are actually the same when convenient, and that differences between the parties are just theatrics. Throw the theory out when Republican politicians impotently yell about something for a cool soundbite, though.

---

The classic "muh conspiracy". I guess the Mitt Romney's and John McCain's of the world that would rather work with democrats than conservatives in their own party is just a conspiracy.

---

This just in: purple states exist, and politicians have to cater to a purple audience.

Also, sometimes there are red states with a blue senator, such as West Virginia, and that senator cannot go along with the Democrat party line all the time.

This "muh uniparty" idea is a lazy, ridiculous, overly simplified explanation of how things work.

---

Not for long. Manchin isn't running again, and he will 100% be replaced by a republican. He also votes 99.9% with the progressive left. Hence why he's not running again.

As for the uniparty tag, you liberals love the bipartisan republicans. Which is something democrats never follow. Double standard.

Problem with Ken Buck is he represents a heavy red area of Colorado, which is far from purple. He saw the silver lining and tucked his tail.