Brigitte Macron "conspiracy theory"

10,229 Views | 93 Replies | Last: 10 mo ago by Ag_0112358132134
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Emotional Support Cobra said:

Robert C. Christian said:

Pre 30 year old pic for her means prior to 1983.

To me, Occam's razor would to say "it's harder to find 40 year old pictures from before we all had cameras in our pocket" than "everyone Brigitte knew before she was 30 is covering up that fact that she was a man".


That is such BS if it is that important. I can produce pictures of both my parents as children in the 40s, in 5 minutes, and beyond, their wedding pics, holding me as a baby, plus a few photos of great grandparents. Unless you have had a house fire, this is ridiculous that this cannot be dealt with in 5 minutes.
The French didn't have cameras until 2007 when the iphone was invented.

Case closed.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.


if this is true, and i am not saying it is,but if it is true and what candace owens claims that macron is controlled due to this secret. then that's a big deal. purely observational but to me in many instances that's how TPTB works. they put people in place that they can influence and or control.

Yep! only Candace Owens 4000 miles away can figure this entire thing out!!

no one in the French media or Macron's opposition can find it out the last 30 years- but our girl Candace knows everything!!

if the French don't care about Trans- how would this knowledge be able to "blackmail" him?!?!

He would be celebrated if it was true!

another idiotic Trumper conspiracy theory.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brother Shamus said:

Meanwhile the border is still a disaster, taxes are too high, cities and infrastructure are crumbling, the list goes on and on. But hey! Let's focus on stupid bull**** like this.
Bingo.

"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old Army Metal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ben Shapiro doesn't look masculine enough. ****** for sure.
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Army Metal said:

Brother Shamus said:

Meanwhile the border is still a disaster, taxes are too high, cities and infrastructure are crumbling, the list goes on and on. But hey! Let's focus on stupid bull**** like this.


Well yeah this jumps immediately to the top of the priority list because a lot of people here really, really hate trans people. Like, viscerally.


Again, wrong. We don't want people telling us our kids can, and should, be put in puberty blockers and have gender reassignment surgery because one time my son said "I'm a girl." We also don't want to be forced to recognize and play along with someone's delusion.

Russell Bradleys Toupee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madman said:

People generally know when something is off and it can make a person fascinating.
Like when you see a dog walking on its hind legs.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

BluHorseShu said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

I could see it...


I'll tell you though...After some incidents this past year, the idea of calling a women 'trans' because she's not objectively pretty or has some manly features, it should really make anyone who has young daughters be concerned about the same happening.

I couldn't imagine if someone questioned my daughters gender on social media. For those that don't have daughters its often a an easy punchline though
Meh, we only really do it to high profile elites and/or truly bad people who deserve every bit, and then some.

I rarely see people on here just clowning on innocent young girls with a unique appearance who did absolutely nothing to deserve it. Greta Thundberg (although not trans) is one exception, but most of the insults were aimed at her awful parents, and those who prop her up or look to her as a voice of reason. And, given the cultish BS she pushes, she's not completely off limits imo.

For instance, when people make this comparison to her, it's mostly an attack against her selfish degenerate hedonistsic parents...



Fair enough.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is like the birther thing with Obama. Whether it is true or not is absolutely not knowable to any of us as random people in random places, but it sure does paint the people who are willing to accept it as easy to manipulate loons.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phatbob said:

This is like the birther thing with Obama. Whether it is true or not is absolutely not knowable to any of us as random people in random places, but it sure does paint the people who are willing to accept it as easy to manipulate loons.

I guess that's why Hillary invented the bother thing to try to win the Democratic vote in the primaries
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.
BlueTaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty funny that people here are acting like this is some component of the GOP platform or priority for the right. Or that it's about some larger trans debate.

It's just one internet thread about a significant story on the leader of a nation mostly insignificant to the US.
BlueTaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


How many times have you checked this thread? How many posts have you read? You posted twice....looks like you are giving your minutes f lol
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlueTaze said:

Pretty funny that people here acting like this is some component of the GOP platform or priority for the right. Or that it's about some larger trans debate.

It's just one internet thread about a significant story on the leader of a nation mostly insignificant to the US. Love or hate Candace she raises some questions that remain unanswered by her critics here and abroad.

Like I said, this is the golden opportunity to destroy Candace Owens and her career. The fact that we see no one attempting to conclusively prove her wrong is remarkable. Just a bunch people whining about her and avoiding her claims.
Or they see her as a joke and aren't going to give her the time of day.

And it is not our job on TA to disprove anything she claims. It is her job to prove it.

You want it to be true simply because it fits your preconceived notion of some big conspiracy that only people like you and Owens know the truth about.

The rest of us will continue to use critical thinking and see that she has no proof beyond how a person looks and demanding pictures from decades ago.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
BlueTaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Or they see her as a joke and aren't going to give her the time of day.


You have spent a significant amount of your time of day reading this thread and posting at least 5 times. Still nothing of substance. Not only have you spent a lot of your time on this, but you have absolutely wasted it with nothing to refute her specific claims.

It's pretty clear you see this as an attack on trans community or some larger anti-LGBT effort. Sorry for triggering you. I'm really just interested in hearing the other side of this claim.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlueTaze said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


How many times have you checked this thread? How many posts have you read? You posted twice....looks like you are giving your minutes f lol

"Minute", as in small. "My noot"
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


No it isn't. People care if they've been lied to, and most people don't think it's a good thing if political world leaders or just people in positions of authority generally are madmen, or have a tenuous grasp on reality. That's not good.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


No it isn't. People care if they've been lied to, and most people don't think it's a good thing if political world leaders or just people in positions of authority generally are madmen, or have a tenuous grasp on reality. That's not good.


He is a socialist/liberal. That was already proof of a tenuous grasp of reality.

This? Is beyond ****ing stupid. But hey, Candace is garnering clicks. Capitalism, even if based on stupid, ruhtarded bull****, is still better than liberalism.
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


No it isn't. People care if they've been lied to, and most people don't think it's a good thing if political world leaders or just people in positions of authority generally are madmen, or have a tenuous grasp on reality. That's not good.


He is a socialist/liberal. That was already proof of a tenuous grasp of reality.

This? Is beyond ****ing stupid. But hey, Candace is garnering clicks. Capitalism, even if based on stupid, ruhtarded bull****, is still better than liberalism.

It's stupid how? I really don't understand why you're so angry at people who think this is interesting. If this helps to paint a picture in people's minds of the true extent of the level of depravity in the world that these people live in, why should we be angry if CO wants to shine a light on it?

I don't normally watch Candace because intellectually I don't think she's one of the heavier hitters at DW, but this made me look up her actual monologue, and it's at least interesting if its a charitable characterization of the media's work to this point. I think it's definitely worthy of being talked about in case in turns out to be true.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


No it isn't. People care if they've been lied to, and most people don't think it's a good thing if political world leaders or just people in positions of authority generally are madmen, or have a tenuous grasp on reality. That's not good.


He is a socialist/liberal. That was already proof of a tenuous grasp of reality.

This? Is beyond ****ing stupid. But hey, Candace is garnering clicks. Capitalism, even if based on stupid, ruhtarded bull****, is still better than liberalism.

It's stupid how? I really don't understand why you're so angry at people who think this is interesting. If this helps to paint a picture in people's minds of the true extent of the level of depravity in the world that these people live in, why should we be angry if CO wants to shine a light on it?

I don't normally watch Candace because intellectually I don't think she's one of the heavier hitters at DW, but this made me look up her actual monologue, and it's at least interesting if its a charitable characterization of the media's work to this point. I think it's definitely worthy of being talked about in case in turns out to be true.


Who is angry? You sound like a liberal. I'm just laughing HEARTILY at this subject.

It's "stupid" because....it is. In the big picture/scheme of things, it means nothing to anything.
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


No it isn't. People care if they've been lied to, and most people don't think it's a good thing if political world leaders or just people in positions of authority generally are madmen, or have a tenuous grasp on reality. That's not good.


He is a socialist/liberal. That was already proof of a tenuous grasp of reality.

This? Is beyond ****ing stupid. But hey, Candace is garnering clicks. Capitalism, even if based on stupid, ruhtarded bull****, is still better than liberalism.

It's stupid how? I really don't understand why you're so angry at people who think this is interesting. If this helps to paint a picture in people's minds of the true extent of the level of depravity in the world that these people live in, why should we be angry if CO wants to shine a light on it?

I don't normally watch Candace because intellectually I don't think she's one of the heavier hitters at DW, but this made me look up her actual monologue, and it's at least interesting if its a charitable characterization of the media's work to this point. I think it's definitely worthy of being talked about in case in turns out to be true.


Who is angry? You sound like a liberal. I'm just laughing HEARTILY at this subject.

It's "stupid" because....it is. In the big picture/scheme of things, it means nothing to anything.

You're angry because some people are paying any attention to this. Like, you want me to think this is stupid and you're mad that I don't.
That you said capitalism is better than liberalism, as though they're mutually exclusive things tells me you have a tenuous grasp on what liberalism even is. The irony here is that it sounds like you've been taken in by libertarianism, and you're saying I sound like a liberal.

Get a grip man.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


No it isn't. People care if they've been lied to, and most people don't think it's a good thing if political world leaders or just people in positions of authority generally are madmen, or have a tenuous grasp on reality. That's not good.


He is a socialist/liberal. That was already proof of a tenuous grasp of reality.

This? Is beyond ****ing stupid. But hey, Candace is garnering clicks. Capitalism, even if based on stupid, ruhtarded bull****, is still better than liberalism.

It's stupid how? I really don't understand why you're so angry at people who think this is interesting. If this helps to paint a picture in people's minds of the true extent of the level of depravity in the world that these people live in, why should we be angry if CO wants to shine a light on it?

I don't normally watch Candace because intellectually I don't think she's one of the heavier hitters at DW, but this made me look up her actual monologue, and it's at least interesting if its a charitable characterization of the media's work to this point. I think it's definitely worthy of being talked about in case in turns out to be true.


Who is angry? You sound like a liberal. I'm just laughing HEARTILY at this subject.

It's "stupid" because....it is. In the big picture/scheme of things, it means nothing to anything.

You're angry because some people are paying any attention to this. Like, you want me to think this is stupid and you're mad that I don't.
That you said capitalism is better than liberalism, as though they're mutually exclusive things tells me you have a tenuous grasp on what liberalism even is. The irony here is that it sounds like you've been taken in by libertarianism, and you're saying I sound like a liberal.

Get a grip man.


Angry? LOL

Nope. I don't care if you believe it, or not. Why can you post in support and yet get flustered when someone posts against that premise?

You believe whatever you want. This "theory" makes no sense and other than an old, ugly face, there is zero proof of anything to it.

BlueTaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:


It's "stupid" because....it is. In the big picture/scheme of things, it means nothing to anything.


Jussie Smollet was also stupid in that it meant nothing. It's the gaslighting and attacks on anyone trying to expose potential lying (ie fake pics, mysterious disappearances etc).

Hopefully we will see if France is pulling a Smollet or if Candace crashes and burns on her big bet. It's really not anymore than that at this point. TBD.
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

Bob Lee said:

BigRobSA said:

BlueTaze said:

Rapier108 said:

This is such a stupid and pointless thing to engage in.

I know Owens is nothing but a bomb thrower who does stuff to get attention, but it accomplishes nothing but giving her clicks.

I agree it doesn't matter if Marcons wife is trans or not.

They should either provide proof its false, and ruin Candace's career. Or admit its true, and say who cares, making Candace look like an attention grabbing bully. Otherwise, there exists the possibility that a nation is controlled by a compromised leader, which IS a very BIG deal....worsened if the gov controlled media is engaging in the scheme.




LOL. Why? Because some dip**** is saying something?

I like Candace, usually. This is ****ing dumb. And, no, the Macrons shouldn't entertain this stupidity in the slightest.


If it's true they tried to pass off a picture of the daughter as her, that's strange is it not? It's the opposite of your approach. They're just fueling the fire.


Strange? Sure

Even stranger.....giving a single, minute ****.


No it isn't. People care if they've been lied to, and most people don't think it's a good thing if political world leaders or just people in positions of authority generally are madmen, or have a tenuous grasp on reality. That's not good.


He is a socialist/liberal. That was already proof of a tenuous grasp of reality.

This? Is beyond ****ing stupid. But hey, Candace is garnering clicks. Capitalism, even if based on stupid, ruhtarded bull****, is still better than liberalism.

It's stupid how? I really don't understand why you're so angry at people who think this is interesting. If this helps to paint a picture in people's minds of the true extent of the level of depravity in the world that these people live in, why should we be angry if CO wants to shine a light on it?

I don't normally watch Candace because intellectually I don't think she's one of the heavier hitters at DW, but this made me look up her actual monologue, and it's at least interesting if its a charitable characterization of the media's work to this point. I think it's definitely worthy of being talked about in case in turns out to be true.


Who is angry? You sound like a liberal. I'm just laughing HEARTILY at this subject.

It's "stupid" because....it is. In the big picture/scheme of things, it means nothing to anything.

You're angry because some people are paying any attention to this. Like, you want me to think this is stupid and you're mad that I don't.
That you said capitalism is better than liberalism, as though they're mutually exclusive things tells me you have a tenuous grasp on what liberalism even is. The irony here is that it sounds like you've been taken in by libertarianism, and you're saying I sound like a liberal.

Get a grip man.


Angry? LOL

Nope. I don't care if you believe it, or not. Why can you post in support and yet get flustered when someone posts against that premise?

You believe whatever you want. This "theory" makes no sense and other than an old, ugly face, there is zero proof of anything to it.



So anything less than complete indignation and incredulity you would characterize as "support"? I'm at "this is interesting and I'd like to more". That's it.

eta: when you cuss on her like you did, it comes across as an angry expression. Maybe you always cuss. I don't know.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Umm, Candace has really gone off the reservation lately. Kinda sad. I know conspiracies are on an unbelievable win streak but I think this one is just silly/funny.
BlueTaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If she is wrong I hope she takes a huge hit in her followers and platform backing. She is going hard in the paint on this, and therefore needs to pay up if she loses the bet.

That said, things are looking pretty good when her critics attack her, and say they don't want to waste time debunking her claims. Then turn it into some larger anti-trans attack and label anyone questioning it a "bigot". Those are usually signs there maybe something there. Not always, but usually.
RanchoBrushyTop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Occam's Razor is overused sometimes but it is based on a sound concept that the solution with the fewer variables and fewer low probability elements is the more likely to be valid.

Sometimes improbable conspiracies turn out to be correct as more data turns up that supports them and conflicting data is invalidated. More often, it is the opposite, and more data eventually rules it out.


Occam's Razor has almost zero application in 2024.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Doubtful, but given how feminine Macron, Obama and Trudeau are, I wouldn't be surprised about anything related to them.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
astros4545
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old Army Metal said:

Brother Shamus said:

Meanwhile the border is still a disaster, taxes are too high, cities and infrastructure are crumbling, the list goes on and on. But hey! Let's focus on stupid bull**** like this.


Well yeah this jumps immediately to the top of the priority list because a lot of people here really, really hate trans people. Like, viscerally.


What is there to like
CactusThomas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big white Mike
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?

nm
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No amount of facts or evidence will satisfy some people on the right. They will always have a comeback, no matter how lacking in substance it might be.

Oh, dear, Wait until you see how much gullible **** the left believes.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mike Obama is a man and Epstein didn't kill himself. Both can be true. If this story is also true then it provides more fact that the globalist trash that run governments are truly spawn of Satan.
BlueTaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After a few more searches, unfortunately I don't think this topic will be proven either way in the near term, or maybe ever. Which means Candace probably gets let off the hook on this.

She has been wrong in past and owned it, but never staked her entire career on an allegation, which is a big part of what makes this topic thread worthy.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.