Boarding a flight at DFW. Just saw this on a monitor. Airports are funny places… pic.twitter.com/wcszlmEvrK

— The Real Mike Rowe (@mikeroweworks) March 13, 2024

Did Aaron kneel during the National Anthem? Serious question as I don't watch NFL.

dmart90 said:

---

What a great way to tell everyone you are not a serious candidate.

---

Exactly. Very disappointing

If those are the choices it will be Ventura. Rogers isn't going to do a VP run.

IF it is Ventura, Minnesota just got interesting

I will guess Yang, Gabbard or Ventura

I hope it isn't Rogers, Rowe or Lindsey. They might help pull some of the Trump supporters

nortex97 said:

---

BlueTaze said:

---

You proved my point. RFK does NOT personally want to disarm Americans. He is basically saying he will leave it up to the other 2 gov branches to hash out before it comes to his desk.

I don't like that about him. I would like to hear him say he would veto any assault weapons ban or 2A infringement. But it's still not fair to claim "he wants to disarm us".

The right pushes false narratives that he wants to disarm, and the left pushes false narratives about him being anti-vax. We see this every election cycle, and it's remarkable how effective it is at keeping a 3rd head off the big debate stage.

---

Ok, sure.

Anyone who wants to ban some set of guns for looking mean 'if other people think that is a good idea' then I just intrinsically don't trust their judgment.

I don't think this is what is keeping him off any debate stage, either. In fact, I am not sure we will see the potatus take a debate stage this year.

---

Repeating something over and over doesn't make it true. RFK never stated he "wanted to ban" any set of guns. He simply stated he wouldn't veto it if passed by congress and wasnt ruled unconstitutional by SCOTUS. I don't know why it's so hard for you to understand the difference.

Considering the make up congress and SCOTUS currently, there is little probability a ban would make it to oval office for sig. I think much of RFKs stance takes that into consideration.

Dems like Biden are demanding a ban, which is a very stark diff. So its wrong to claim his position is same as dems.

This is exactly the kind of thing a Kennedy would do

BlueTaze said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

BlueTaze said:

---

You proved my point. RFK does NOT personally want to disarm Americans. He is basically saying he will leave it up to the other 2 gov branches to hash out before it comes to his desk.

I don't like that about him. I would like to hear him say he would veto any assault weapons ban or 2A infringement. But it's still not fair to claim "he wants to disarm us".

The right pushes false narratives that he wants to disarm, and the left pushes false narratives about him being anti-vax. We see this every election cycle, and it's remarkable how effective it is at keeping a 3rd head off the big debate stage.

---

Ok, sure.

Anyone who wants to ban some set of guns for looking mean 'if other people think that is a good idea' then I just intrinsically don't trust their judgment.

I don't think this is what is keeping him off any debate stage, either. In fact, I am not sure we will see the potatus take a debate stage this year.

---

Repeating something over and over doesn't make it true. RFK never stated he "wanted to ban" any set of guns. He simply stated he wouldn't veto it if passed by congress and wasnt ruled unconstitutional by SCOTUS. I don't know why it's so hard for you to understand the difference.

Considering the make up congress and SCOTUS currently, there is little probability a ban would make it to oval office for sig. I think much of RFKs stance takes that into consideration.

Dems like Biden are demanding a ban, which is a very stark diff. So its wrong to claim his position is same as dems.

---

An "assault weapons ban" has already been passed by congress previously.

SCOTUS can't review/determine anything just because someone is curious what they would say about it.

He's playing games to appeal to people not paying attention. I like to listen to Joe Rogan sometimes too and don't consider either of them dumb by any means but there is zero doubt he has any substantive support for the 2nd amendment in him if he were to miracle himself to 270 EC votes. Further, he has no plan to somehow get him into a competitive position in a single state.

I don't hate him, I just don't think what he is saying is intended as a real campaign to be elected POTUS. I distrust all Democrats, including every single Kennedy (except for that guy from Louisiana).

All three candidates are a freak show, why cNt we have someone normal.

When you think some politician is bat **** crazy, then they go off and say Aaron Rodgers is on their VP short list to double down.

Yes, there was a 1994 ban, but I was referencing the current congress and SCOTUS that would look to subsequent rulings like Heller. That's why I think a federal assault weapons ban chatter is just rhetoric these days for dem votes. States will just continue to legislate it like they have been.

Part of me thinks the federal gov trying to actually impose a ban in near term would be good. Let's go ahead and see where these FBI field agents stand when it comes to raiding Texas properties. It will be the litmus test for whether we get a mass exodus and peaceful correction, or a modernized civil war.

Quote:

---

Who in their right mind would want Aaron Rogers one heart beat away from the presidency ?

---

Pat McAfee

IndividualFreedom said:

---

Quote:

---

Who in their right mind would want Aaron Rogers one heart beat away from the presidency ?

---

Pat McAfee

---

I rest my case.

Looks like its SHANAHAN!


Not Kyle or Mike. Nicole.

https://nypost.com/2024/03/16/us-news/rfk-jr-to-name-nicole-shanahan-as-running-mate-in-white-house-run-report/

Who?


Easy on the eyes:

Good grief.

"The Bay Area attorney was married to Google's Brin in 2018 but they officially divorced last summer after she was reportedly romantically involved with Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

Musk and Brin were previously longtime friends, and Musk frequently stayed over at Brin's home, the Wall Street Journal reported in 2022.

However, the two reportedly had a falling out following Musk and Shanahan's brief fling in December 2021, when Brin requested that his financial advisers sell his personal investments in Musk's companies.

…

Musk and Shanahan have denied the allegations.

"This is total bs," Musk posted on X in July 2022, in response to a user who shared the WSJ article.

"I've only seen Nicole twice in three years, both times with many other people around. Nothing romantic," he added.

Brin filed for a dissolution of marriage from Shanahan in January 2022. The couple shares a young daughter together, according to People."

Looks like Shanahan is official!

RFK’s VP choice, Nicole Shanahan, is a six-figure donor to... George Gascon, the pro-crime, Soros-backed prosecutor who helped wreck San Francisco and is currently wrecking LA. She also spent big on Measure J, a Los Angeles measure to reroute spending from law enforcement and… pic.twitter.com/ei3p1sggA0

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) March 26, 2024

Where's the "he's a moderate!!" Posters?