CA Annual Registration of all Firearms
5,116 Views |
67 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by APHIS AG
What do you expect. It's California. I'm sure the criminal element will be following "laws" as usual.
Another "feels good" law... Would you register your gun?
doubledog said:
Another "feels good" law... Would you register your gun?
5th
I hope it does pass. Every lib out there deserves this.
Knowing the name of every law abiding gun owner and what they own accomplishes nothing as far as public safety.
If you are a conservative, move!
Knowing the name of every law abiding gun owner and what they own accomplishes nothing as far as public safety.
If you are a conservative, move!
I'm sure the criminals and insurgents will line up to follow this if passed. They are here to assimilate and help our nation prosper.
If not registering becomes a felony, this is a serious issue. I lose my professional license not only in CA but everywhere in the US.
Unless you plan on a yearly tax to those who are dumb enough to actually register them.Quote:
Knowing the name of every law abiding gun owner and what they own accomplishes nothing as far as public safety.
Yah, this is gonna bring in all the gang-bangers.
Logos Stick said:
I hope it does pass. Every lib out there deserves this.
Knowing the name of every law abiding gun owner and what they own accomplishes nothing as far as public safety.
If you are a conservative, move!
CA has just as many conservatives as Texas. I keep a residence in CA but now my primary residency is in VA.
What gun?doubledog said:
Another "feels good" law... Would you register your gun?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
It says punishable as an infraction.
" In California, an infraction is a minor violation of the law. Unlike misdemeanors and felonies, which are crimes, infractions are not considered to be crimes. If you get charged with an infraction, you can be fined up to $250.00 but as long as you pay the fine you cannot be sent to jail."
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/infractions/
" In California, an infraction is a minor violation of the law. Unlike misdemeanors and felonies, which are crimes, infractions are not considered to be crimes. If you get charged with an infraction, you can be fined up to $250.00 but as long as you pay the fine you cannot be sent to jail."
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/infractions/
MonkeyKnifeFighter said:
So this is a $250/gun/year tax to keep your firearms off the registry.
It's a poll tax on the 2nd amendment.
Yes it is
100% Unconstitutional
But they are counting on getting a year or so of abuse out of it while it makes it way through the courts
SCOTUS needs an instant review power where any law like this that's so blatantly unconstitutional a first year law student can see it is instantly struck down and those who voted for it removed from office permanently
bmks270 said:
It says punishable as an infraction.
" In California, an infraction is a minor violation of the law. Unlike misdemeanors and felonies, which are crimes, infractions are not considered to be crimes. If you get charged with an infraction, you can be fined up to $250.00 but as long as you pay the fine you cannot be sent to jail."
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/infractions/
For now. Incrementalism, bud.
It will get increasingly more severe with each round of law making.
This is the Democrat way.
Maroon Dawn said:MonkeyKnifeFighter said:
So this is a $250/gun/year tax to keep your firearms off the registry.
It's a poll tax on the 2nd amendment.
Yes it is
100% Unconstitutional
But they are counting on getting a year or do of abuse out of it while it makes it way through the courts
SCOTUS needs an instant review power where any law like this that's so blatantly unconstitutional a first year law student can see it is instantly struck down and those who voted for it removed from office permanently
Until the court is stacked. That's coming.
This will make sense once you understand that they want the criminals to have guns and the peaceful to be helpless.
AggieDruggist89 said:Logos Stick said:
I hope it does pass. Every lib out there deserves this.
Knowing the name of every law abiding gun owner and what they own accomplishes nothing as far as public safety.
If you are a conservative, move!
CA has just as many conservatives as Texas. I keep a residence in CA but now my primary residency is in VA.
Change it.
Its not going to get better, even if this is struck down.
Mongolian Christmas said:
This will make sense once you understand that they want the criminals to have guns and the peaceful to be helpless.
Of course
They want crime so bad that people give into idiocy like nationalizing all police forces and controlling them from Washington
Nothing bad can come from your local LEOs being the brown shirts of the DNC
good Lord. This statute is punitive, not prophylactic. No one in the California legislature expects a criminal to register his firearm.IslanderAg04 said:
What do you expect. It's California. I'm sure the criminal element will be following "laws" as usual.
Do you folks not realize that the California legislature passed this bill with the intent (among others) to give law-enforcement officers an additional charge to bring against bad guys who use an (unregistered) firearm?.
Sometimes I wonder when A&M stopped teaching people to think.
Women and minorities hit hardest...literally...I will pay because I live in LA county where I can imagine the DA piling on in the event I happen to be in their crosshairs for any reason whatsoever. Noncompliance is not worth the risk.Quote:
An annual fee would be deposited into a special fund for the purpose of carrying out the administration and enforcement of the firearm registry.
Intentionally onerous.
AggieDruggist89 said:
Are you ****ing kidding me
Bull*****.. This better not pass.
Ha ha
Good luck with that … only and idiot would register their gun
Antoninus said:good Lord. This statute is punitive, not prophylactic. No one in the California legislature expects a criminal to register his firearm.IslanderAg04 said:
What do you expect. It's California. I'm sure the criminal element will be following "laws" as usual.
Do you folks not realize that the California legislature passed this bill with the intent (among others) to give law-enforcement officers an additional charge to bring against bad guys who use an (unregistered) firearm?.
Sometimes I wonder when A&M stopped teaching people to think.
That's a ridiculously idiotic take.
Judge Benitez gonna be busy
Maroon Dawn said:Mongolian Christmas said:
This will make sense once you understand that they want the criminals to have guns and the peaceful to be helpless.
This is how China did it under Mao.
Of course
They want crime so bad that people give into idiocy like nationalizing all police forces and controlling them from Washington
Nothing bad can come from your local LEOs being the brown shirts of the DNC
bmks270 said:
It says punishable as an infraction.
" In California, an infraction is a minor violation of the law. Unlike misdemeanors and felonies, which are crimes, infractions are not considered to be crimes. If you get charged with an infraction, you can be fined up to $250.00 but as long as you pay the fine you cannot be sent to jail."
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/infractions/
How many infractions make a felony? So 10 guns not registered, is that 10 infractions per year and $2500 per year???
Antoninus said:good Lord. This statute is punitive, not prophylactic. No one in the California legislature expects a criminal to register his firearm.IslanderAg04 said:
What do you expect. It's California. I'm sure the criminal element will be following "laws" as usual.
Do you folks not realize that the California legislature passed this bill with the intent (among others) to give law-enforcement officers an additional charge to bring against bad guys who use an (unregistered) firearm?.
Sometimes I wonder when A&M stopped teaching people to think.
Yes, California DA's are known for their tough-on-crime prosecutorial philosophy while being staunchly pro-2nd amendment…
It's a good thing we're awash in energy because if I weren't so dumb and happy right now I would seriously question your motivations and reasonings.
Antoninus said:good Lord. This statute is punitive, not prophylactic. No one in the California legislature expects a criminal to register his firearm.IslanderAg04 said:
What do you expect. It's California. I'm sure the criminal element will be following "laws" as usual.
Do you folks not realize that the California legislature passed this bill with the intent (among others) to give law-enforcement officers an additional charge to bring against bad guys who use an (unregistered) firearm?.
Sometimes I wonder when A&M stopped teaching people to think.
Every intent of a politician is to appease the majority and get re-elected. This will be popular with purple haired woke he-shes (70%) of CA population.
Kvetch said:Antoninus said:good Lord. This statute is punitive, not prophylactic. No one in the California legislature expects a criminal to register his firearm.IslanderAg04 said:
What do you expect. It's California. I'm sure the criminal element will be following "laws" as usual.
Do you folks not realize that the California legislature passed this bill with the intent (among others) to give law-enforcement officers an additional charge to bring against bad guys who use an (unregistered) firearm?.
Sometimes I wonder when A&M stopped teaching people to think.
Yes, California DA's are known for their tough-on-crime prosecutorial philosophy while being staunchly pro-2nd amendment…
It's a good thing we're awash in energy because if I weren't so dumb and happy right now I would seriously question your motivations and reasonings.
Notwithstanding that, the argument that a criminal who commits armed robbery and is going to get 10 years in prison but now will have an additional $250 fine because of an unregistered gun, as if that makes any difference whatsoever, is down right ******ed.
Horse *****
They don't enforce existing laws against criminals.
Speaking of education….or a pathological liar, pick your poison.
They don't enforce existing laws against criminals.
Speaking of education….or a pathological liar, pick your poison.
Staff - take out the trash.
Do you think President Newsom will try the same thing nationally?
Absolutely.
Logos Stick said:Kvetch said:Antoninus said:good Lord. This statute is punitive, not prophylactic. No one in the California legislature expects a criminal to register his firearm.IslanderAg04 said:
What do you expect. It's California. I'm sure the criminal element will be following "laws" as usual.
Do you folks not realize that the California legislature passed this bill with the intent (among others) to give law-enforcement officers an additional charge to bring against bad guys who use an (unregistered) firearm?.
Sometimes I wonder when A&M stopped teaching people to think.
Yes, California DA's are known for their tough-on-crime prosecutorial philosophy while being staunchly pro-2nd amendment…
It's a good thing we're awash in energy because if I weren't so dumb and happy right now I would seriously question your motivations and reasonings.
Notwithstanding that, the argument that a criminal who commits armed robbery and is going to get 10 years in prison but now will have an additional $250 fine because of an unregistered gun, as if that makes any difference whatsoever, is down right ******ed.
It's sad that ActBlue can't recruit better talent than Simple Jack Antoninus given the massive amount of funding they receive. But I guess they need someone on the same level as their average voter.
Any form of gun registration is the creation of an inventory list for confiscation. If Leftists/DemocRats could even muster up any kind of truth, they'd tell you that is exactly why they want gun registration.
How would you know what A&M teaches?
Featured Stories
See All
5:14
22h ago
4.1k
Identifying where Texas A&M could improve or decline in 2026
by Olin Buchanan
Breaking down Texas A&M volleyball's portal haul
by Kay Naegeli
14:04
18h ago
2.6k
Biz Ag
UIL set for football realignment announcement on Monday….. (2-9)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8
giddings_ag_06
UIL set for football realignment announcement on Monday….. (2-9)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8
MarcAg
I STG Baseball season is going to be untenable with you lot
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
7
Texas_Ag11
35 seconds left in the game, ball on the 20 and you need a TD to win. Who's your guy?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
5