Shagga said:
Tucker has lost it. There are some circumstances worth taking up arms, and there are some that are not. If I thought illegals were coming to murder my kids or grands, I would take up arms. As it is now, I'm working from home, collecting a good salary, and posting on TexAgs. Tonight, I'll drive to College Station and watch a bunch of young men try and put an orange sphere through an orange circle, while another group of young men tries to stop them. I'm not suggesting that the illegals have had no effect on my life - they have, especially when consider the future quality of life of those kids and grands. But as it is now, I'm virtually unaffected, so it's not worth taking up arms. And if we continue to have idiot Dems in charge, that likely will change.
First, the reason there
hasn't been any wanton killing of illegal immigrants is because people haven't lost it. Nobody wants to do that. If however, as you have alluded to, illegal immigration looked more like Hamas against Israel we would have another story.
Tucker hasn't lost it either. He is right in the call to citizens defending their property, communities, state, and nation. And however one might read into his statement,
Quote:
That leaves the population to defend itself. Where are the men of Texas? Why aren't they protecting their state and the nation?
He did not say take up arms and go Rambo. However, how else would citizens defend themselves against foreign invaders? Therefore the implication, right? Although maybe just arriving at the border en masse and forming a human barricade telling people to go the **** back would be a sight to behold.
But I digress, the reason people are saying **** like this, is because nobody knows what to do. Nobody wants to take up arms. But what is our recourse? We pay taxes to a corrupt government that not only won't defend our person and property, but puts the rights of illegal invaders above our own.
Lastly, that we are, as yet, "virtually unaffected." Several years ago many, if not most, posters here were proclaiming the same about being unaffected by what people do in their bedroom, a pleasant euphemism dismissing any sense of sexual morality, and look where we are only 8 years after the Supreme Court ruling on same sex marriage.
We're the proverbial frog in slowly boiling water when we consider ourselves virtually unaffected.