Derek Chauvin did nothing wrong

16,962 Views | 187 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by YokelRidesAgain
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Logos Stick said:

You cannot be serious!
I am quite serious.

I pay my taxes, as (I presume) do most of you.

For some cop to decide, hey, I decide what laws I obey, sticks in my craw.

Your "hero" is not a good dude. It is disturbing that so many people are unable to realize that, hey, sometimes BOTH parties in an individual situation suck.



He's not a hero. He is, however, a patsy for the left
Terminus Est
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Terminus Est said:

YokelRidesAgain said:

Terminus Est said:

I want to repeat again in case anyone misunderstood me: Derek Chauvin did NOTHING wrong.
We're just going "no harm, no foul" on the felony tax evasion?

Is this a real post
Is this a joke?

Dude paid zero dollars in taxes on $80,000 in cash from his private security gig, filed false returns alleging that he resided in Florida, and didn't file a couple of returns (on which he owed money) altogether.

This isn't some 18 year old kid being pursued by the IRS for 15% of their babysitting money. This was more of a Leona Helmsley, "taxes are for little people" deal. Chauvin and his ex-wife knew full well that what they were doing was illegal, and neither of them bothered to dispute it when they were both convicted of felonies.

And yeah, yeah, I know, F16, taxation is theft. It is nonetheless the law, and asserting that an officer of the law can pick and choose which rules to obey is laughable.

Chauvin was, at best, a dirty cop with (per disciplinary records unrelated to Floyd) an anger management problem.

It is rich to condemn one side for elevating a felon as a saint, while doing, well, the same damn thing.


Brother, I'm just talking about with regard to the Floyd thing. If someone went to arrest Chauvin and he OD'd on fentanyl under the dudes knee, I wouldn't be tearing up downtown Houston
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrEvazanPhD said:


He's not a hero. He is, however, a patsy for the left
Is Chauvin, individually, being made to suffer for the sins of a multitude of individuals?

Sure. Doesn't make him innocent.

He is a common thief. None of which excuses the incompetence of the Federal Bureau of Prisons in allowing him to get stabbed, btw.

The irony is that Chauvin moved heaven and earth to try to get transferred to federal custody, including pleading guilty to a felony attached to a 20 year sentence. Minnesota was protecting him in ad-seg, and would have continued to so indefinitely.
With apologia to jkag89
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Sure. Doesn't make him innocent.


He is a common thief. None of which excuses the incompetence of the Federal Bureau of Prisons in allowing him to get stabbed, btw.
Link?
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Sure. Doesn't make him innocent.


He is a common thief. None of which excuses the incompetence of the Federal Bureau of Prisons in allowing him to get stabbed, btw.
Link?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/former-minneapolis-police-officer-derek-chauvin-pleads-guilty-in-tax-case
With apologia to jkag89
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again. He isn't in jail because he evaded taxes. He got himself put on the lefts radar and the feds went hunting to find more laws to charge him with.
Antoninus
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Is it just me, of did anyone else think "Woody Harrelson" when they saw this photo?
Antoninus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SW-14 said:

Quote:

Floyd, who was Black, died on May 25, 2020, after Chauvin, who is white
**** like this makes it easy to spot the bias in an article
Does it also bother you when a news report identifies a victim as White and the assailant as Black?
Moral High Horse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Antoninus said:



Is it just me, of did anyone else think "Woody Harrelson" when they saw this photo?

john danaher
Antoninus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RGLAG85 said:


Why do people have to spew such lies?
Why do people assert that opinions which differ from their own are ... "lies?"
Antoninus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Logos Stick said:

You cannot be serious!
I am quite serious.

I pay my taxes, as (I presume) do most of you.

For some cop to decide, hey, I decide what laws I obey, sticks in my craw.

Your "hero" is not a good dude. It is disturbing that so many people are unable to realize that, hey, sometimes BOTH parties in an individual situation suck.
It is amazing the extent to which people in our society will idolize ANYONE who acts in opposition to someone that they don't like.

Chauvin is a perfect example. NOT A GOOD GUY. Did he "murder" Floyd? I don't think so, but for some he is a hero, because they don't like Floyd.

Another good example is McCloskey. By all accounts, a completely horrid human being. But he pointed a rifle at BLM, so he becomes a hero to certain elements of our society.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Terminus Est said:

YokelRidesAgain said:

Terminus Est said:

I want to repeat again in case anyone misunderstood me: Derek Chauvin did NOTHING wrong.
We're just going "no harm, no foul" on the felony tax evasion?

Is this a real post
Is this a joke?

Dude paid zero dollars in taxes on $80,000 in cash from his private security gig, filed false returns alleging that he resided in Florida, and didn't file a couple of returns (on which he owed money) altogether.

This isn't some 18 year old kid being pursued by the IRS for 15% of their babysitting money. This was more of a Leona Helmsley, "taxes are for little people" deal. Chauvin and his ex-wife knew full well that what they were doing was illegal, and neither of them bothered to dispute it when they were both convicted of felonies.

And yeah, yeah, I know, F16, taxation is theft. It is nonetheless the law, and asserting that an officer of the law can pick and choose which rules to obey is laughable.

Chauvin was, at best, a dirty cop with (per disciplinary records unrelated to Floyd) an anger management problem.

It is rich to condemn one side for elevating a felon as a saint, while doing, well, the same damn thing.


This liberal cares very much about tax evasion when it's some spare loser cop in Minnesota keeping his $80k but cannot care less when it's Pedo Joe and his crackhead son funneling millions from foreign sources to their shell companies.

Amazing.

Also, I haven't seen one person on all of texags since this happened (which has been years now) "elevate" Chauvin. Not one. Your argument is incredibly weak and blinded by bias and honesty just makes you look like a foolish shill.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Logos Stick said:

You cannot be serious!
I am quite serious.

I pay my taxes, as (I presume) do most of you.

For some cop to decide, hey, I decide what laws I obey, sticks in my craw.

Your "hero" is not a good dude. It is disturbing that so many people are unable to realize that, hey, sometimes BOTH parties in an individual situation suck.



Is this guy on the same thread as everyone else?

Holy derail, Batman!
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Antoninus said:

SW-14 said:

Quote:

Floyd, who was Black, died on May 25, 2020, after Chauvin, who is white
**** like this makes it easy to spot the bias in an article
Does it also bother you when a news report identifies a victim as White and the assailant as Black?


Link please!

I've always wanted to see a real unicorn.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Logos Stick said:

You cannot be serious!
I am quite serious.

I pay my taxes, as (I presume) do most of you.

For some cop to decide, hey, I decide what laws I obey, sticks in my craw.

Your "hero" is not a good dude. It is disturbing that so many people are unable to realize that, hey, sometimes BOTH parties in an individual situation suck.



Did he also lie to his momma? Steak a cookie from the cookie jar?
I don't care what he did outside this case. It's irrelevant

Second, he's not my hero.

Chauvin did nothing wrong in the Floyd case. You libs interpreted that as " Floyd did nothing wrong during the span of his lifetime".

The guy was railroaded.

As far as tax evasion, Geitner did it. Hunter did it. Numerous Dems have done it and gotten away with it but you are ok with it because they are in your side.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Antoninus said:

YokelRidesAgain said:

Logos Stick said:

You cannot be serious!
I am quite serious.

I pay my taxes, as (I presume) do most of you.

For some cop to decide, hey, I decide what laws I obey, sticks in my craw.

Your "hero" is not a good dude. It is disturbing that so many people are unable to realize that, hey, sometimes BOTH parties in an individual situation suck.
It is amazing the extent to which people in our society will idolize ANYONE who acts in opposition to someone that they don't like.

Chauvin is a perfect example. NOT A GOOD GUY. Did he "murder" Floyd? I don't think so, but for some he is a hero, because they don't like Floyd.

Another good example is McCloskey. By all accounts, a completely horrid human being. But he pointed a rifle at BLM, so he becomes a hero to certain elements of our society.


Who idolizes Chauvin?

You guys have such poor arguments all you can keep doing is setting up hysterically laughable strawmen about people "idolizing" and "elevating" Chauvin.

Show me ONE post where this is being done. You can literally go back years if you need to.

Maybe, just maybe, not everyone on here are leftist shills and are able to think for themselves unlike a few of you who do nothing but repeat lies and create strawmen that make you look like you are completely incapable of critical or serious thought.
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:



Is this guy on the same thread as everyone else?

Holy derail, Batman!
YOU: Stop derailing!

ALSO YOU: Let's talk about Hunter Biden!
With apologia to jkag89
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:



Is this guy on the same thread as everyone else?

Holy derail, Batman!
YOU: Stop derailing!

ALSO YOU: Let's talk about Hunter Biden!


You seem incredibly lost.

You're a doctor?
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD

They applaud it. The budding little communists want more chaos so they can install more brown shirt control.

Isn't very hard to see Lenin's 100+ year old strategy being resurrected.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD
No one needs to come acknowledge that because that's not really what the autopsy report said.

We should also stop acting like the "full" "official" autopsy making the rounds on social media right now wasn't fully released three years ago.
Opalka
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RGLAG85 said:

BrazosDog02 said:

WestTexasAg said:

"Did nothing wrong" is certainly a stretch.


You mean pressing …" a knee on his neck for 9 minutes " is not ok?

Hmm…who could have imagined there was a line between enforcing the law and killing citizens in the process.

Ah well, ol boy has a couple decades to think it through, well, probably not gauging by how his daily shanking seems to be going.


Why do people have to spew such lies?
Hmmm, probably because of what the jury said in the case?? Seems like they had a lot more info than anyone on here.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ciboag96 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD

They applaud it. The budding little communists want more chaos so they can install more brown shirt control.

Isn't very hard to see Lenin's 100+ year old strategy being resurrected.


I honestly just think it's a mixture of ignorance, blind partisanship and quite frankly…stupidity.

At least on the peon level we're dealing with.
AgBandsman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

I wouldn't say he did nothing wrong, but he's certainly not guilty of murdering Floyd.
I'll say it:

He did nothing wrong.

Floyd was a drug abuser with a criminal record that had lethal drugs in his system when he died. He resisted arrest continuously for hours. He failed to comply with law enforcement, forcing law enforcement to use increasingly aggresive tactics to detain a criminal.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBandsman said:

GAC06 said:

I wouldn't say he did nothing wrong, but he's certainly not guilty of murdering Floyd.
I'll say it:

He did nothing wrong.

Floyd was a drug abuser with a criminal record that had lethal drugs in his system when he died. He resisted arrest continuously for hours. He failed to comply with law enforcement, forcing law enforcement to use increasingly aggresive tactics to detain a criminal.
Not hours. Whole thing took much less than an hour from the time the first cops arrived until he was taken away by ambulance.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD
No one needs to come acknowledge that because that's not really what the autopsy report said.

We should also stop acting like the "full" "official" autopsy making the rounds on social media right now wasn't fully released three years ago.


It says there was no damage to the trachea and that he died of heart failure related to fentanyl (among many other drugs) in his system

I defy you to post anything from the official coroners autopsy that says otherwise
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

CASE TITLE: CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST COMPLICATING LAW ENFORCEMENT SUBDUAL, RESTRAINT, AND NECK COMPRESSION

DECEASED: George Floyd aka Floyd Perry SEX: M AGE: 46

DATE AND HOUR OF DEATH: 5-25-20; 9:25 p.m.

DATE AND HOUR OF AUTOPSY: 5-26-20; 9:25 a.m. P

PATHOLOGIST: Andrew M. Baker, M.D.
LINK
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD
No one needs to come acknowledge that because that's not really what the autopsy report said.

We should also stop acting like the "full" "official" autopsy making the rounds on social media right now wasn't fully released three years ago.
It says there was no damage to the trachea and that he died of heart failure related to fentanyl (among many other drugs) in his system

I defy you to post anything from the official coroners autopsy that says otherwise
OK. Challenge accepted. Page one of the autopsy reports "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression."

And if you have any doubt as to what that means, the man who performed the autopsy and wrote the report testified at trial he would classify it as a "homicide" and that "In my opinion, the law enforcement subdual, restraint and the neck compression was just more than Mr. Floyd could take by virtue of those heart conditions."

I would absolutely agree that the autopsy reports fentanyl in his system and that the examiner did indeed testify the drugs in his system contributed to his death.

But it is absolutely wrong to suggest the autopsy says Floyd wasn't murdered or that he died of an overdose.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Opalka said:

RGLAG85 said:

BrazosDog02 said:

WestTexasAg said:

"Did nothing wrong" is certainly a stretch.


You mean pressing …" a knee on his neck for 9 minutes " is not ok?

Hmm…who could have imagined there was a line between enforcing the law and killing citizens in the process.

Ah well, ol boy has a couple decades to think it through, well, probably not gauging by how his daily shanking seems to be going.


Why do people have to spew such lies?
Hmmm, probably because of what the jury said in the case?? Seems like they had a lot more info than anyone on here.


No they didn't. They had what was presented to them within the rules and parameters laid down by the judge in his court. That is part of the problem, it's essentially a documentary with slanted evidence presented and it went the prosecution's way due to the judge and his rulings. In totality, it's easy for me to see he was railroaded by this system. If I was a juror I would still see him as innocent of the charges, but in that specific venue, I can see people different from me think he's guilty.

And for you other goobs, no one is calling him a hero. Quit with that false narrative.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL that you believe that report.

Baker lied per the deposition of Sweasy.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD
No one needs to come acknowledge that because that's not really what the autopsy report said.

We should also stop acting like the "full" "official" autopsy making the rounds on social media right now wasn't fully released three years ago.
It says there was no damage to the trachea and that he died of heart failure related to fentanyl (among many other drugs) in his system

I defy you to post anything from the official coroners autopsy that says otherwise
OK. Challenge accepted. Page one of the autopsy reports "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression."

And if you have any doubt as to what that means, the man who performed the autopsy and wrote the report testified at trial he would classify it as a "homicide" and that "In my opinion, the law enforcement subdual, restraint and the neck compression was just more than Mr. Floyd could take by virtue of those heart conditions."

I would absolutely agree that the autopsy reports fentanyl in his system and that the examiner did indeed testify the drugs in his system contributed to his death.

But it is absolutely wrong to suggest the autopsy says Floyd wasn't murdered or that he died of an overdose.


IOW he lied on the stand because as we now know thanks to that other case he said he knew it was not murder and an overdose and had nothing to do with the restraint because there was zero damage to the trachea

He did the same thing the judge and jury did and convicted a man because they were terrified of what the mob would do to them if they didn't
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

"In my opinion, the law enforcement subdual, restraint and the neck compression was just more than Mr. Floyd could take by virtue of those heart conditions."
Which is not a direct cause/manner of death. That is weasel language. Manner of death is a but/for analysis.

But for the defendant's acts, the victim would have lived. He's not saying that when he uses the word "complicating."

Floyd also was positive (PCR) for covid. So was his death due to covid? Or did he die "with covid"?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

BRAIN (10-12): Sections of hippocampus, cerebellum, cerebral cortex, and midbrain show the expected microscopic architecture, without hypoxicischemic, reactive, neoplastic, or inflammatory changes.
Also this.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD
No one needs to come acknowledge that because that's not really what the autopsy report said.

We should also stop acting like the "full" "official" autopsy making the rounds on social media right now wasn't fully released three years ago.
It says there was no damage to the trachea and that he died of heart failure related to fentanyl (among many other drugs) in his system

I defy you to post anything from the official coroners autopsy that says otherwise
OK. Challenge accepted. Page one of the autopsy reports "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression."

And if you have any doubt as to what that means, the man who performed the autopsy and wrote the report testified at trial he would classify it as a "homicide" and that "In my opinion, the law enforcement subdual, restraint and the neck compression was just more than Mr. Floyd could take by virtue of those heart conditions."

I would absolutely agree that the autopsy reports fentanyl in his system and that the examiner did indeed testify the drugs in his system contributed to his death.

But it is absolutely wrong to suggest the autopsy says Floyd wasn't murdered or that he died of an overdose.
IOW he lied on the stand because as we now know thanks to that other case he said he knew it was not murder and an overdose and had nothing to do with the restraint because there was zero damage to the trachea

He did the same thing the judge and jury did and convicted a man because they were terrified of what the mob would do to them if they didn't
I'll assume then that you at least agree with me the autopsy didn't say he wasn't murdered nor did it say he died of an overdose.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Can't help but notice not a single Leftist apologist on here wants to acknowledge the official autopsy report that says clear as day Floyd was not murdered but did OD
No one needs to come acknowledge that because that's not really what the autopsy report said.

We should also stop acting like the "full" "official" autopsy making the rounds on social media right now wasn't fully released three years ago.
It says there was no damage to the trachea and that he died of heart failure related to fentanyl (among many other drugs) in his system

I defy you to post anything from the official coroners autopsy that says otherwise
OK. Challenge accepted. Page one of the autopsy reports "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression."

And if you have any doubt as to what that means, the man who performed the autopsy and wrote the report testified at trial he would classify it as a "homicide" and that "In my opinion, the law enforcement subdual, restraint and the neck compression was just more than Mr. Floyd could take by virtue of those heart conditions."

I would absolutely agree that the autopsy reports fentanyl in his system and that the examiner did indeed testify the drugs in his system contributed to his death.

But it is absolutely wrong to suggest the autopsy says Floyd wasn't murdered or that he died of an overdose.
IOW he lied on the stand because as we now know thanks to that other case he said he knew it was not murder and an overdose and had nothing to do with the restraint because there was zero damage to the trachea

He did the same thing the judge and jury did and convicted a man because they were terrified of what the mob would do to them if they didn't
I'll assume then that you at least agree with me the autopsy didn't say he wasn't murdered nor did it say he died of an overdose.



The AUTOPSY showed plenty of evidence of a death due to overdose but none that actually showed evidence the restraint killed him

The TESTIMONY was pure lies to prevent acknowledging that
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.