Elon Musk Drops the Hammer on Media Matters

14,072 Views | 127 Replies | Last: 11 mo ago by fka ftc
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

BluHorseShu said:

flakrat said:

Hope X takes them for every penny and then some.
At the rate X is going...they need every penny they can get.
Based on what data, exactly? Link?
Good grief. So your take is that revenues are up, and the number of users is growing? I admit, costs are down...he fired half his workforce. Maybe like Aggie Football, he's still in a building year. Plus, Musk lost a bunch of users to Truth Social which is running like gangbusters.

And here is the unfortunate thing about sources these days...If the source is left leaning, they won't report, generally, on anything positive for things on the right....and the same is true with right leaning sources.

Either X is improving since Musk took over, or its not. My contention is the latter.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

BluHorseShu said:

Jabin said:

Yeah, SpaceX's rockets are so crummy that just under half of all world-wide orbital launches in 2023 were done on SpaceX rockets.
Exactly. And what other company can you by an electric car from that you can just throw away after 10 years bc no one will by it bc the battery's cost more than the car. They're the new cell phones (w/slightly higher price tag).

He's a highly intelligent guy. But being smart and owning the libs does not a great president make. I mean look at Trump, he had one of those and still couldn't drain the swamp.
1) No one on this thread mentioned Trump.

2) No one on this thread mentioned Musk for president.

3) No one on this thread mentioned Tesla.

4) No one talked about owning the libs


Elon for POTUS was on page one. No one mentions rockets at first...until they did and people replied. There's a common thread here and you'll see it if you try a little.

We all know media matters leans left. So yes, taking them down is the Schadenfreude of owning the libs.

ETA: And on page 4 here someone mentioned loving how 'Musk triggers the libs here'. Which is funny because now you are no longer a conservative if you disagree with anything Musk related. There must be some F16 handbook of how to know if your an 'real' conservative beyond they historical tenets of conservatives. I haven't seen it but I do know they require believing the election was stolen, Jan 6 was a false flag instigated by the FBI/DOJ, Trump is the only one who can save the world.....But I digress...no one mentioned those things.....
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu said:

BusterAg said:

BluHorseShu said:

flakrat said:

Hope X takes them for every penny and then some.
At the rate X is going...they need every penny they can get.
Based on what data, exactly? Link?
Good grief. So your take is that revenues are up, and the number of users is growing? I admit, costs are down...he fired half his workforce. Maybe like Aggie Football, he's still in a building year. Plus, Musk lost a bunch of users to Truth Social which is running like gangbusters.

And here is the unfortunate thing about sources these days...If the source is left leaning, they won't report, generally, on anything positive for things on the right....and the same is true with right leaning sources.

Either X is improving since Musk took over, or its not. My contention is the latter.
Well, that is the great thing about private companies. They don't need quarterly earnings. Measuring improvement by quarterly cash flow is pretty short sighted.

Musk has the most valuable consumer trend-based AI training data in the world. A little negative cash flow isn't going to hurt.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu said:



We all know media matters leans left. So yes, taking them down is the Schadenfreude of owning the libs.

What does that exactly mean to you?

Would you say that winning a defamation lawsuit is "owning the libs"? You are making that into one of those squishy terms that has no meaning.

A major defamation win against Media Matters is not just winning in the eyes of public opinion with a mean tweet. It is holding liars accountable for illegal business practices.

In the previous two sentences, is the latter the same thing as the former in your eyes?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knoxtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty weird stuff here.

Two guys who just left Paxtons office grab a local attorney and file in fort worth. Paxton simultaneously announces he will begin a criminal investigation. Then em describes his own lawsuit as thermonuclear, which is about as far away as this suit could be.

After reading the petition, I doubt mm is to worried about this. Their attorneys fees will be worth about 10% of the free publicity
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, now he's done it. Paris Hilton has terminated her advertising partnership with Twitter/X.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Leftist loses their **** over Nazis saying they hate Jews

But switch out swastika flags for Palestinian flags and suddenly those exact same leftists can't agree enough with the exact same message
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This. I guess they just want to have the choice of which antisemitic team they cheer for?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

BluHorseShu said:

Jabin said:

Yeah, SpaceX's rockets are so crummy that just under half of all world-wide orbital launches in 2023 were done on SpaceX rockets.
Exactly. And what other company can you by an electric car from that you can just throw away after 10 years bc no one will by it bc the battery's cost more than the car. They're the new cell phones (w/slightly higher price tag).

He's a highly intelligent guy. But being smart and owning the libs does not a great president make. I mean look at Trump, he had one of those and still couldn't drain the swamp.
1) No one on this thread mentioned Trump.

2) No one on this thread mentioned Musk for president.

3) No one on this thread mentioned Tesla.

4) No one talked about owning the libs




That's BluHorseShu, the obvious conservative, you're talking to.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Which is funny because now you are no longer a conservative if you disagree with anything Musk related. There must be some F16 handbook of how to know if your an 'real' conservative beyond they historical tenets of conservatives.


Nobody thinks you're conservative based on the totality of your posting history. You seem to be the only one who is fooled.

Happy Thanksgiving Indigenous Peoples Day!
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Quote:

Which is funny because now you are no longer a conservative if you disagree with anything Musk related. There must be some F16 handbook of how to know if your an 'real' conservative beyond they historical tenets of conservatives.


Nobody thinks you're conservative based on the totality of your posting history. You seem to be the only one who is fooled.

Happy Thanksgiving Indigenous Peoples Day!

If that dude claims he's a conservative, that's trolling at its best.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Quote:

Which is funny because now you are no longer a conservative if you disagree with anything Musk related. There must be some F16 handbook of how to know if your an 'real' conservative beyond they historical tenets of conservatives.


Nobody thinks you're conservative based on the totality of your posting history. You seem to be the only one who is fooled.

Happy Thanksgiving Indigenous Peoples Day!
Yeah I heard "Happy Friends Giving " on tv yesterday yesterday …. It's so blatant these days, trying to force change ….

Without the Pilgrims and Indians having a big dinner party I wouldn't get to take a week off and raise my cholesterol and drink like I've never had alcohol….

I don't get to take a week off just to have a drink with fiends .. that's a weekly event, nothing special about Friends Giving slogan
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:


Musk has the most valuable consumer trend-based AI training data in the world. A little negative cash flow isn't going to hurt.
Maybe so, but it looks like OpenAI is now at the point where their AI can generate its own training data. Meaning the data that it generates is better quality data than is generated by humans.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Update: Democrat machine pours money at an increasing rate into X advertisements.

captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Update: Democrat machine pours money at an increasing rate into X advertisements.





You have to advertise where the views are. Twitter still king
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

nortex97 said:

Update: Democrat machine pours money at an increasing rate into X advertisements.





You have to advertise where the views are. Twitter still king
Bud Light was king too, but that didn't stop the consumers from boycotting and knocking that king off its perch. democrats are just being hypocrites because they know their protestations against X are nothing but fluff to feed their mindless drones.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Twitter is like plastic. Everyone who tells you they hate it actually use it more than 99% of the rest of the world. .
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood said:

captkirk said:

nortex97 said:

Update: Democrat machine pours money at an increasing rate into X advertisements.





You have to advertise where the views are. Twitter still king
Bud Light was king too, but that didn't stop the consumers from boycotting and knocking that king off its perch. democrats are just being hypocrites because they know their protestations against X are nothing but fluff to feed their mindless drones.
How many times has Keith Olbermann quit twitter? He was "done for good" a week ago. He's posted over 20 times today alone. Libs just can't quit twitter
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The interesting thing to me is the hypocrisy, just because it was/is Democrat partisans trying to destroy Elon/x etc. They still have a business to run, though. My SWAG is that it's not just volume/reach, but there are a lot more 'persuadable' people on twitter than meta/insta/tik-tok etc.

Probably an oversimplification as there are more younger voters/idiots on tik tok than anywhere else, but in general I am just guessing. $90K from Adam Schiff is just hilarious. In any case, 2024 might be in the $10 billion range for political ad spending, net, given inflation etc.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

You have to advertise where the views are. Twitter still king
$1 million from dems on twitter might as well be pocket change. trump alone spent over $60 million on google and facebook ads between january and may 2020.

but nortex is right, politicians are all hypocrites and will gladly spend ad dollars on whatever platform gets their message across to potential voters, owners' politics notwithstanding.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrat = Hypocrite = Liar = Evildoer = Anti-American

All the same. Its why they must be removed.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.