Are you guys seriously just assuming there was no cheating in elections 50 years ago? Or 100 years ago? Or 150 years ago? When there were no cameras or any kind of reliable monitoring at all? I think cheating is part of almost every election, I mean if masses of people will do it even when playing video games or running college football programs or being married then why wouldn't they do it when it comes to political power?

I'll bet you could pick some random local small-town election in Alabama for sheriff in 1908 and if you could go back and see it with clairvoyance it would be clear that the whole thing was fabricated entirely with the sheriff's powerful good ol boy friends creating the result they wanted and the votes were never even counted at all. And multiply that everywhere. It's naive to think otherwise. Human nature doesn't really change much, people have always been corrupt.

But for those of you who are 100% convinced that literally millions or even tens of millions of votes (for those people who keep putting asterisks next to the 81 million) were created out of thin air in 2020 with the complicity of the law enforcement agencies, the judicial system, and the national media then I honestly don't know what's kept you from starting the shooting. You're effectively saying the right to vote has been taken from you and yet you're not doing anything about it.

But as I've said on other threads, I don't think most who complain are really convinced of that. If you're convinced that voting is a complete illusion anyway then why do those same people argue over who our nominee will be? And why would they even vote next year? But they will.

The right pigs are whistling.

Can't even address the facts. I accept your surrender.

Georgia voter here. When you vote on a dominion machine, it prints out your ballot with perfectly generated ovals. You check it, then put your unfolded ballot in the sealed ballot box on your way out the door. It's a pristine document.

If they were folded or didn't have perfectly filled ovals, it would be weird not the other way around.

The op presented a story that 150k ballots are missing and the county attorneys quit. Did you miss the part about the attorneys quitting? Or are you saying they are unrelated?

Demosthenes81 said:

---

Who wants to bet that those ballots have all been perfectly folded by a machine by now.

---

Up in smoke.

Seems like the only news here is that a couple attorneys want to quit the case, and this could be for a myriad of reasons.

The bigger point I want to explore is what the end game of the plaintiffs is. They prove that thousands of ballots were fake, great. The law in Georgia was already changed substantially to curb this particular kind of voter fraud with an overhaul of the drop-box, absentee, and mail-in vote rules. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/big-changes-under-georgias-new-election-law-2021-06-14/

So the plantiff's only want the state to admit that Trump should've won Georgia in 2020? What good is that going to do in the grand scheme of things? It will hardly stop people from trying to create fraudulent votes. Seems the plantiff's time would be better served trying to stop cheating in the future or learning how to cheat themselves.

There are no "missing ballots" click through all the layers of clickbait and you'll see it's just a claim unsupported by any of the click throughs. I don't know why one of the county officials is switching lawyers after 3 years. I am certain it won't matter.

The. Ballot. Images. Are. Public. Have been for 2 years.

Whistle Pig said:

---

Can't even address the facts. I accept your surrender.

---

I didn't see him surrender. Your hallucinations are taking over again.

You don't think the impacts of proving the election was stolen wouldn't have huge ramifications?

It is amazing how you don't see a poster, than when certain topics pop up with new news, here they are. Ready to flood the discussion with talking points. Just ignore the troll or in this case pig.

Philip J Fry said:

---

You don't think the impacts of proving the election was stolen wouldn't have huge ramifications?

---

He probably is worried that proving Trump should have been president will help him get elected. Which is obviously true.

Federal agencies are PROVEN to have colluded with media and big tech to rig/influence the 2020 election. Yet we're supposed to believe a bunch of mouth breathing loyal liberal zealots on the ground level wouldn't do everything in their power to keep Orange Man out of office? LOL, ok.

Philip J Fry said:

---

You don't think the impacts of proving the election was stolen wouldn't have huge ramifications?

---

I can't think of anything, maybe I'm missing something.

What do you think the practical ramifications would be? The Georgia law has already changed, and they can't ban absentee voting because it'll get slapped down.

It certainly won't discourage cheating in the future.

texagbeliever said:

---

Philip J Fry said:

---

You don't think the impacts of proving the election was stolen wouldn't have huge ramifications?

---

He probably is worried that proving Trump should have been president will help him get elected. Which is obviously true.

---

If he won Georgia he still would've lost the presidency.

If he had won Georgia and Arizona he still would've lost the presidency.

I fail to see proving election fraud in a red state will help trump get over the insurmountable hump of flipping a rust-belt state

rgag12 said:

---

Seems like the only news here is that a couple attorneys want to quit the case, and this could be for a myriad of reasons.

The bigger point I want to explore is what the end game of the plaintiffs is. They prove that thousands of ballots were fake, great. The law in Georgia was already changed substantially to curb this particular kind of voter fraud with an overhaul of the drop-box, absentee, and mail-in vote rules. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/big-changes-under-georgias-new-election-law-2021-06-14/

So the plantiff's only want the state to admit that Trump should've won Georgia in 2020? What good is that going to do in the grand scheme of things? It will hardly stop people from trying to create fraudulent votes. Seems the plantiff's time would be better served trying to stop cheating in the future or learning how to cheat themselves.

---

How many have taken felony charges or face a felony charge for saying there was fraud in the 2020 election? Do their lives not matter? Do they not deserve to be exonerated? And how about the 73 million voters that were disenfranchised, do they not deserve to know the truth?

How many have suffered hardships from evil policies being implemented or have suffered political prosecution from this administration? Do they not deserve to know?

GeorgiAg said:

---

Georgia voter here. When you vote on a dominion machine, it prints out your ballot with perfectly generated ovals. You check it, then put your unfolded ballot in the sealed ballot box on your way out the door. It's a pristine document.

If they were folded or didn't have perfectly filled ovals, it would be weird not the other way around.

---

Cool. Now do mail-ins

Joes said:

---

Are you guys seriously just assuming there was no cheating in elections 50 years ago? Or 100 years ago? Or 150 years ago? When there were no cameras or any kind of reliable monitoring at all? I think cheating is part of almost every election, I mean if masses of people will do it even when playing video games or running college football programs or being married then why wouldn't they do it when it comes to political power?

I'll bet you could pick some random local small-town election in Alabama for sheriff in 1908 and if you could go back and see it with clairvoyance it would be clear that the whole thing was fabricated entirely with the sheriff's powerful good ol boy friends creating the result they wanted and the votes were never even counted at all. And multiply that everywhere. It's naive to think otherwise. Human nature doesn't really change much, people have always been corrupt.

But for those of you who are 100% convinced that literally millions or even tens of millions of votes (for those people who keep putting asterisks next to the 81 million) were created out of thin air in 2020 with the complicity of the law enforcement agencies, the judicial system, and the national media then I honestly don't know what's kept you from starting the shooting. You're effectively saying the right to vote has been taken from you and yet you're not doing anything about it.

But as I've said on other threads, I don't think most who complain are really convinced of that. If you're convinced that voting is a complete illusion anyway then why do those same people argue over who our nominee will be? And why would they even vote next year? But they will.

---

LOL...bro, the most disturbing part of the 2020 election isn't cheating in Ga, Pa, or anywhere else...it's that the weaponized FBI and other agencies colluded with tech and media companies to rig/influence the 2020 election in their boy's (Biden) favor. This actually happened and is far more troubling than pockets of cheating in swing states imo. This is corrupt banana republic sh**.

Bet you think this didn't happen, or that it has always been the norm, or somethin like that.

Quote:

---

First, investigators looked into the allegations contained in the sworn affidavit of Susan Voyles, which the Petitioners are relying on in their case. (See Petition at 25-27 & Ex. E). Ms. Voyles served as an auditor in the risk-limiting audit for Fulton County, and she alleges in her affidavit that she saw a batch of "pristine" absentee ballots during the audit that looked suspicious to her.

While Box 5 was a cardboard box as described
by the witness, none of the absentee ballots contain in Box 5 or in Batches 28-36 met the
description of being "pristine." All of the ballots had creases where they had been folded, and
none appeared to have been marked or printed from a computer.

Following this inspection, two of the Secretary's investigators interviewed Ms. Voyles on
January 7, 2021. The witness confirmed the statement in her affidavit that she had seen a batch of "pristine" absentee ballots during the risk-limiting audit, and told investigators that the absentee ballots were from Box 5/Batches 28-36. The witness then added the caveat that she could have been mistaken in her sworn statement and that Batches 28-36 instead could have been in Box 135. Investigators followed up on this lead and confirmed with county elections officials that Box 135/Batches 28-36 was not a box/batch combination that existed.

Following the interview of Ms. Voyles, investigators interviewed Barbara Hartman, who also submitted an affidavit for Petitioners in this action. She also told investigators that, contrary to Ms. Voyles' statement, neither she nor Ms. Voyles had reported any suspicious-looking absentee ballots to Fulton County elections officials

---

https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/sos-amicus-brief.pdf

2-3 year old recycled clickbait.

Court. Where conspiracy theories and "Kanekoa the Great" tweets go to die.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Georgia voter here. When you vote on a dominion machine, it prints out your ballot with perfectly generated ovals. You check it, then put your unfolded ballot in the sealed ballot box on your way out the door. It's a pristine document.

If they were folded or didn't have perfectly filled ovals, it would be weird not the other way around.

---

Is that what happens to ballots that are collected prior to election day? The ones that are mailed in?

Whistle Pig said:

---

There are no "missing ballots" click through all the layers of clickbait and you'll see it's just a claim unsupported by any of the click throughs. I don't know why one of the county officials is switching lawyers after 3 years. I am certain it won't matter.

The. Ballot. Images. Are. Public. Have been for 2 years.

---

Surely you could link that

GeorgiAg said:

---

Georgia voter here. When you vote on a dominion machine, it prints out your ballot with perfectly generated ovals. You check it, then put your unfolded ballot in the sealed ballot box on your way out the door. It's a pristine document.

If they were folded or didn't have perfectly filled ovals, it would be weird not the other way around.

---

These are about mail-in ballots. What does a scenario about in person voting mean?

"Voyles also noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different paper than the others she'd counted and none were folded or creased, which is standard for mail-in ballots as they come from envelopes. "

rgag12 said:

---

texagbeliever said:

---

Philip J Fry said:

---

You don't think the impacts of proving the election was stolen wouldn't have huge ramifications?

---

He probably is worried that proving Trump should have been president will help him get elected. Which is obviously true.

---

If he won Georgia he still would've lost the presidency.

If he had won Georgia and Arizona he still would've lost the presidency.

I fail to see proving election fraud in a red state will help trump get over the insurmountable hump of flipping a rust-belt state

---

Pennsylvania illegally changed their constitution to allow mail in ballots. Texas' case against the state of PA for doing so was ignored

If fraud can happen at scale in GA and AZ, why would it not have also happened in other states as well??

rgag12 said:

---

texagbeliever said:

---

Philip J Fry said:

---

You don't think the impacts of proving the election was stolen wouldn't have huge ramifications?

---

He probably is worried that proving Trump should have been president will help him get elected. Which is obviously true.

---

If he won Georgia he still would've lost the presidency.

If he had won Georgia and Arizona he still would've lost the presidency.

I fail to see proving election fraud in a red state will help trump get over the insurmountable hump of flipping a rust-belt state

---

Keep going!
Then its a good thing we all know Pennsylvania runs perfectly honest elections then isn't it?
And Michigan, not a smidgen of corruption there ... ever!

Whistle Pig said:

---

Quote:

---

First, investigators looked into the allegations contained in the sworn affidavit of Susan Voyles, which the Petitioners are relying on in their case. (See Petition at 25-27 & Ex. E). Ms. Voyles served as an auditor in the risk-limiting audit for Fulton County, and she alleges in her affidavit that she saw a batch of "pristine" absentee ballots during the audit that looked suspicious to her.

While Box 5 was a cardboard box as described
by the witness, none of the absentee ballots contain in Box 5 or in Batches 28-36 met the
description of being "pristine." All of the ballots had creases where they had been folded, and
none appeared to have been marked or printed from a computer.

Following this inspection, two of the Secretary's investigators interviewed Ms. Voyles on
January 7, 2021. The witness confirmed the statement in her affidavit that she had seen a batch of "pristine" absentee ballots during the risk-limiting audit, and told investigators that the absentee ballots were from Box 5/Batches 28-36. The witness then added the caveat that she could have been mistaken in her sworn statement and that Batches 28-36 instead could have been in Box 135. Investigators followed up on this lead and confirmed with county elections officials that Box 135/Batches 28-36 was not a box/batch combination that existed.

Following the interview of Ms. Voyles, investigators interviewed Barbara Hartman, who also submitted an affidavit for Petitioners in this action. She also told investigators that, contrary to Ms. Voyles' statement, neither she nor Ms. Voyles had reported any suspicious-looking absentee ballots to Fulton County elections officials

---

https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/sos-amicus-brief.pdf

2-3 year old recycled clickbait.

Court. Where conspiracy theories and "Kanekoa the Great" tweets go to die.

---

1) Then why not produce them?
2) Then why all of the judges recusing themselves?
3) Then why all of the lawyers running from the hills?

Quote:

---

Pennsylvania illegally changed their constitution to allow mail in ballots.

---

I'll take "things that didn't happen for $500 Alex".

Act 77 was passed unanimously by Republicans in the PA assembly in 2019 and upheld by the Supreme Court 16 months ago.

https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2022/08/pa-mail-voting-law-uphelp-state-supreme-court/

GeorgiAg said:

---

Georgia voter here. When you vote on a dominion machine, it prints out your ballot with perfectly generated ovals. You check it, then put your unfolded ballot in the sealed ballot box on your way out the door. It's a pristine document.

If they were folded or didn't have perfectly filled ovals, it would be weird not the other way around.

---

Fnck! You people. The OP had a big green box around the 150,000 "ABSENTEE OR MAIL-IN" ballots. And then it was written a second time.

Quote:

---

These 150,000 still secret 2020 unfolded mail ballots with the perfect ovals protected by court order for 3 years may have gone missing,

---

Those would not have been printed out of a machine and almost surely would have been folded when mailed (like all the other absentee and mail-in ballots that were NOT considered suspicious)

Either you guys are just actually that stupid, or you are deliberately trying to obfuscate the facts. Both suck, and fnck you for it.

These were mail in ballots, hence it being odd that they weren't creased. But you know that.

AggieKeith15 said:

---

rgag12 said:

---

Seems like the only news here is that a couple attorneys want to quit the case, and this could be for a myriad of reasons.

The bigger point I want to explore is what the end game of the plaintiffs is. They prove that thousands of ballots were fake, great. The law in Georgia was already changed substantially to curb this particular kind of voter fraud with an overhaul of the drop-box, absentee, and mail-in vote rules. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/big-changes-under-georgias-new-election-law-2021-06-14/

So the plantiff's only want the state to admit that Trump should've won Georgia in 2020? What good is that going to do in the grand scheme of things? It will hardly stop people from trying to create fraudulent votes. Seems the plantiff's time would be better served trying to stop cheating in the future or learning how to cheat themselves.

---

How many have taken felony charges or face a felony charge for saying their was fraud in the 2020 election? Do their lives not matter? Do they not deserve to be exonerated? And how about the 73 million voters that were disenfranchised, do they not deserve to know the truth?

How many have suffered hardships from evil policies being implemented or have suffered political prosecution from this administration? Do they not deserve to know?

---

I voted for Trump. If they found in favor of the plaintiff's I wouldn't care. Biden is still in power, I don't care if my vote was validated.

Of course if someone was convicted for saying that there was fraud in Fulton county for these ballots when there actually was then they should sue the hell out of everyone.

I have no sympathy for the people who threw out the FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD blanket statements for every state Trump lost. Those people are charlatans and grifters. The only folks that have cases that needed to be looked at are in Georgia and Arizona.

nortex97 said:

---

There is NO EVIDENCE, they claim
(because it's been kept secret for over 3 years)

Take it to COURT, they whine
(GA Supreme Court said bring out the ballots)

No JUDGE has found, they assert
(because they all run away)

Joe Biden didn't 'WIN' Georgia in 2020, you can now reply https://t.co/7OxYspHIGW

— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) November 10, 2023

I remain convinced there is zero chance FJB really won Georgia in 2020. The leaky urinal, bs ballots, sham counting in Fulton county, none of it adds up at all.

pic.twitter.com/Vuxv1rMz4D

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) November 8, 2023

There is nothing abnormal about Maricopa County deleting all of their precinct voting info soon after the 2020 election. https://t.co/03gDLJvlKs

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) November 8, 2023

When the pigs are squealing about even having doubts, years later, you know you are on the right path toward truth.

---

Who's squealing other than those who still believe Georgia was stolen? Everyone else has moved on. No one has ever said mistakes weren't made or there weren't technical issues. I think most just don't believe it rose anywhere close to a grand conspiracy or fraudulent intent. And if it was a grand conspiracy with the courts et al involved in squashing any attempts vindicate it, then who exactly is going to move it forward?

Whistle Pig said:

---

Quote:

---

Pennsylvania illegally changed their constitution to allow mail in ballots.

---

I'll take "things that didn't happen for $500 Alex".

Act 77 was passed unanimously by Republicans in the PA assembly in 2019 and upheld by the Supreme Court 16 months ago.

https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2022/08/pa-mail-voting-law-uphelp-state-supreme-court/

---

That's a state Supreme Court with a leftist majority. Very cute on your part to lie, but no surprise coming from a communist puppet.

Whistle Pig said:

---

Don't even know what you're talking about, but I'm sure it's irrelevant.

The images and tally sheets are public - the claim is discredited. You can check for yourself.

---

This is why dialog with the left is impossible. Note the self-righteous arrogance.

rgag12 said:

---

texagbeliever said:

---

Philip J Fry said:

---

You don't think the impacts of proving the election was stolen wouldn't have huge ramifications?

---

He probably is worried that proving Trump should have been president will help him get elected. Which is obviously true.

---

If he won Georgia he still would've lost the presidency.

If he had won Georgia and Arizona he still would've lost the presidency.

I fail to see proving election fraud in a red state will help trump get over the insurmountable hump of flipping a rust-belt state

---

What is this "hump" is it the current hump that has him leading in the polls? Or is it the cheating that is also occurring in those states?

Quote:

---

So many of these useful idiots in the media really need to stop and think. When their utopia is reached and we have one party rule, the State-run media will need way fewer workers. Investigative reporters, lol don't need them anymore. Editorials and opinion pieces……ha, yea that ain't happening. With Tech fully commandeered by your awesome new government, most photojournalists won't have a job either. A government panel will have to approve what makes it on the internet.

Most of the current media will be managed drones like the rest of us, that is if they aren't disappeared for speaking out.

---

For a historical reference, Google "Night of the Long Knives in Nazi Germany"

"1+1 = 3"
"No it doesn't"
"LOL the right pigs are SQUEALING!"