Potential crisis in South China Sea

6,439 Views | 63 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by fka ftc
K2-HMFIC
How long do you want to ignore this user?


As a note, we're treaty obligated to defend the Philippines.

China could make a move here and force us to make a choice.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitly looked like the Philippine ship was set up.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We" may be treaty obligated but since the CCP is the paymaster of the Biden crime familia I am not sure it really matters what the treaty says.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PI has all but kicked us flags ships off the pier at the old subic navy pier in favor of Chinese cruise ships.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also that little boat looks more like a ferry or something than any resupply boat. Is there any evidence that shows thst it is a vessel of the Philippines navy?

This whole thing looks like a big what to do over nothing
DevilD77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also looks like the supply boat was going straight and the Chines vessel was turning into her.
Ducks4brkfast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If that is a Philippino navy vessel I don't think the Philippines should be talking any *****
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
Ginormus Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
Wrong. 100 Billion to China. /Biden
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
No $$ to any of them. Time they stand or fall "on their own". No more US blood or treasure except on US soil on behalf of US citizens.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
No $$ to any of them. Time they stand or fall "on their own". No more US blood or treasure except on US soil on behalf of US citizens.
Might want to ask McArthur about letting the Philippines stand on their own.
YZ250
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This type of thing happens weekly. China tries to ram ships, uses water cannons, harass Filipino ships, deny resupply of Filipinos in the Spratt islands etc. China is the bully here but will claim to be the victim. The US, Philippines, Australia, Japan, and Canada have all been doing exercises together this year. The US is also expanding bases in the Philippines.
Shoefly!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ginormus Ag said:

fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
Wrong. 100 Billion to China. /Biden

You think the postal service could handle all the mail in ballots from Chyna?
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crossing the bow of any boat is pretty stupid and dangerous, especially if the boat your crossing is much bigger… not too smartty
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

Crossing the bow of any boat is pretty stupid and dangerous, especially if the boat your crossing is much bigger… not too smartty
Not sure the Filipino boat had a choice. The first video looks like the chinese boats attacked the Philipino boat in a pincher move.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YZ250 said:

This type of thing happens weekly. China tries to ram ships, uses water cannons, harass Filipino ships, deny resupply of Filipinos in the Spratt islands etc. China is the bully here but will claim to be the victim. The US, Philippines, Australia, Japan, and Canada have all been doing exercises together this year. The US is also expanding bases in the Philippines.


The pace of shenanigans are accelerating but agreed, it's pretty much all saber rattling.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them


We're probably sending money to Russia too for humanitarian aid. I'm obviously joking but we're clearly the dumbest country ever.

We're Israel's ally but we help finance Iran and we send money to Hamas.

I just can't watch any of this as an American any more. It's like rooting for your football team once it's transparent the whole coaching staff has bet against their own team.

All I can do is follow along as a disinterested neutral party from now on and try to laugh at the stupidity, my country is dead.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This **** happens all the time out there.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No one in that area likes China. They've completely blown their diplomatic wad.
Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone remember when China hacked and rammed our ships?
XXXVII
How long do you want to ignore this user?
K2-HMFIC said:



As a note, we're treaty obligated to defend the Philippines.

China could make a move here and force us to make a choice.


There were no collisions in either video.
DeSantis 2024

FJB, FJB, FJB, etc
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Potential crisis in South China Sea
. . .
It's not a big deal, but I kind of like that it's infuriating to China to use the names the other relevant countries use for the waters by their shores given the whole 9 dash thing and the implication in SCS that it's all China's sea, including the islands and natural resources, regardless of how close they may be to the other countries in the region.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Sea

Quote:

. . .
However, following an escalation of the Spratly Islands dispute in 2011, various Philippine government agencies started using the name West Philippine Sea. A Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) spokesperson said that the sea to the east of the Philippines will continue to be called the Philippine Sea.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Sea#cite_note-14][14][/url] In September 2012, Philippine President Benigno Aquino III signed Administrative Order No. 29, mandating that all government agencies use the name West Philippine Sea to refer to the parts of South China Sea within the Philippines exclusive economic zone, including the Luzon Sea as well as the waters around, within and adjacent to the Kalayaan Island Group and Bajo de Masinloc, and tasked the National Mapping and Resource Information Authority to use the name in official maps.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Sea#cite_note-15][15][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Sea#cite_note-16][16][/url]

In July 2017, to assert its sovereignty, Indonesia renamed the northern reaches of its exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea as the North Natuna Sea, which is located north of the Indonesian Natuna Islands, bordering southern Vietnam exclusive economic zone, corresponding to southern end of South China Sea.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Sea#cite_note-17][17][/url] The "Natuna Sea" is located south of Natuna Island within Indonesian territorial waters.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Sea#cite_note-18][18][/url] Therefore, Indonesia has named two seas that are portions of South China Sea; the Natuna Sea located between Natuna Islands and the Lingga and Tambelan Archipelagos, and the North Natuna Sea located between the Natuna Islands and Cape C Mau on the southern tip of the Mekong Delta in Vietnam.
. . .
FWIW Huangyan Island (in the OP's tweet in the latter part of the 280 characters) is what we call Scarborough Shoal, and you can see why China thinks it should be theirs given its proximity between the Philippines and China (all but unpictured but for the red nub). That's Vietnam hugging the coast over on the left.



I know this thread was more of a WWIII thing, but it's been going on for quite some time (edited - as several other posters already noted). China's dredging up artificial islands for military bases has been pretty impressive.
K2-HMFIC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yukon Cornelius said:

Anyone remember when China hacked and rammed our ships?


Well…they rammed a P-3 a few years ago and are still doing the same silly *****



Do you want to talk about the PRC's continued attempts to hack our power grids?

https://www.reuters.com/technology/microsoft-says-china-backed-hacker-targeted-critical-us-infrastructure-2023-05-24/
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yawn.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I had a Chinese warship tail me for miles and miles in the south China sea. They are so annoying.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yukon Cornelius said:

Anyone remember when China hacked and rammed our ships?

Is this what you're referring to?

https://www.navytimes.com/home/left-column/2018/07/23/is-this-navy-officer-being-held-accountable-for-negligence-or-railroaded/
Ferg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sea Speed said:

PI has all but kicked us flags ships off the pier at the old subic navy pier in favor of Chinese cruise spy ships.
fixed it for you.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sharpshooter said:

whatthehey78 said:

fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
No $$ to any of them. Time they stand or fall "on their own". No more US blood or treasure except on US soil on behalf of US citizens.
Might want to ask McArthur about letting the Philippines stand on their own.
Pretty sure he's no longer among us...but, at this point with ridiculous US involvement in foreign militaristic adventures...I'm done. Not falling for anymore US lies as to why we need to spend US treasure on peoples who don't care and don't want us involved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

Sharpshooter said:

whatthehey78 said:

fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
No $$ to any of them. Time they stand or fall "on their own". No more US blood or treasure except on US soil on behalf of US citizens.
Might want to ask McArthur about letting the Philippines stand on their own.
Pretty sure he's no longer among us...but, at this point with ridiculous US involvement in foreign militaristic adventures...I'm done. Not falling for anymore US lies as to why we need to spend US treasure on peoples who don't care and don't want us involved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, you are cool with us becoming surrounded? Stay away from all foreign involvement and hope for the best? And, the McArthur reference was for..........reference.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sharpshooter said:

whatthehey78 said:

Sharpshooter said:

whatthehey78 said:

fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
No $$ to any of them. Time they stand or fall "on their own". No more US blood or treasure except on US soil on behalf of US citizens.
Might want to ask McArthur about letting the Philippines stand on their own.
Pretty sure he's no longer among us...but, at this point with ridiculous US involvement in foreign militaristic adventures...I'm done. Not falling for anymore US lies as to why we need to spend US treasure on peoples who don't care and don't want us involved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, you are cool with us becoming surrounded? Stay away from all foreign involvement and hope for the best? And, the McArthur reference was for..........reference.
Cool...no. Not an isolationist, but no longer an "interventionist". Our govt. has lied (Tonkin Bay/WMD's, etc.) and "misused" our young men too many times and it has become SOP. We've gained nothing in return and spent/lost far more than our fair share. Viet Nam vet here and have witnessed too much abuse by our 'so called' leaders, who seemingly only care about the $$ that can be pocketed by our participation in foreign conflicts.

ETA - IMHO, our leaders are not concerned about your and my safety, BUT ARE interested in "how much" ($$) can be garnered by your and my son's being put in harms way. SCREW THAT! Time to wise up to their real intentions.
K2-HMFIC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

Sharpshooter said:

whatthehey78 said:

Sharpshooter said:

whatthehey78 said:

fka ftc said:

TRADUCTOR said:

100 Billion to Taiwan stat.
How many billions to Philippines too?

We also need to ensure Australia is protected so at least some billions to them
No $$ to any of them. Time they stand or fall "on their own". No more US blood or treasure except on US soil on behalf of US citizens.
Might want to ask McArthur about letting the Philippines stand on their own.
Pretty sure he's no longer among us...but, at this point with ridiculous US involvement in foreign militaristic adventures...I'm done. Not falling for anymore US lies as to why we need to spend US treasure on peoples who don't care and don't want us involved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, you are cool with us becoming surrounded? Stay away from all foreign involvement and hope for the best? And, the McArthur reference was for..........reference.
Cool...no. Not an isolationist, but no longer an "interventionist". Our govt. has lied (Tonkin Bay/WMD's, etc.) and "misused" our young men too many times and it has become SOP. We've gained nothing in return and spent/lost far more than our fair share. Viet Nam vet here and have witnessed too much abuse by our 'so called' leaders, who seemingly only care about the $$ that can be pocketed by our participation in foreign conflicts.

ETA - IMHO, our leaders are not concerned about your and my safety, BUT ARE interested in "how much" ($$) can be garnered by your and my son's being put in harms way. SCREW THAT! Time to wise up to their real intentions.


So we should ignore treaty obligations then?
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
K2-HMFIC said:





So we should ignore treaty obligations then?
Yes. You think our enemies respect treaties? Worthless paper and not even good for wiping one's arse.
K2-HMFIC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fka ftc said:

K2-HMFIC said:





So we should ignore treaty obligations then?
Yes. You think our enemies respect treaties? Worthless paper and not even good for wiping one's arse.


That's not my question..we have a mutual defense treaty obligation with the Philippines.

My question is...if the Philippines are attacked by the PRC should we ignore our treaty obligation with them and let the PRC achieve their aims?
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.