A day after the October 7th Hamas terror event, you knew the future script was laid out.
1. Israel would retaliate in a disproportionate way.
2. Hamas's only defense to stop Israel was to accuse Israel of unjust brutality and air it out on a global stage.
3. Then, within 2 weeks we get this.
Yes, something from the sky caused a fire in the parking lot of the hospital.
Regardless of where the missile/bomb came from... the facts aren't consistent with 500 deaths.
Please offer a counter to the following argument:
Also, think...
Strangely. There was an immediate death count... it did not take 24-48 hours to work through the rubble. There were no heroic rescues of people stuck under fallen walls or anything like that.
Strangely
British news outlets are interviewing military arms experts who also express doubts about the "so called" blast.
Perhaps someone who knows better based on experience can weigh in?
1. Israel would retaliate in a disproportionate way.
2. Hamas's only defense to stop Israel was to accuse Israel of unjust brutality and air it out on a global stage.
3. Then, within 2 weeks we get this.
Yes, something from the sky caused a fire in the parking lot of the hospital.
Regardless of where the missile/bomb came from... the facts aren't consistent with 500 deaths.
Please offer a counter to the following argument:
- the crater in the parking lot was small
- the hospital building is still standing.
- the hospital did not burn, nor did it crumble.
- the parking lot is not a bloody mess.
- there are no photos of bodies in or around the parking lot.
- video of the scene shows cars just 30 feet away that are uncharred
- there were claims the courtyard/parking lot was "housing" hundreds of people who were displaced...but there are no personal belongings anywhere?
- there are phrases like "the hospital was a crematorium" but no photos of a charred building have emerged?
- The survivor stories are minimal and too generalized.
- This would be a photo-rich environment and there aren't a lot of real photos of the site with bodies.
Also, think...
- We saw the blast in Oklahoma City. Compare the photos. That event killed 168.
- We have photos from the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing. That event killed 307.
Strangely. There was an immediate death count... it did not take 24-48 hours to work through the rubble. There were no heroic rescues of people stuck under fallen walls or anything like that.
Strangely
- The press conference/media photos of Doctors around a room full of bodies is incredibly staged. This doesn't seem like a quick update to inform the public in a chaotic scene.
British news outlets are interviewing military arms experts who also express doubts about the "so called" blast.
Perhaps someone who knows better based on experience can weigh in?