Kozmozag said:

---

What is the law in DC?

---

Same as everywhere.

If you have a (D) after your name, there is no law.

The HOA needs to send biden a strongly worded letter!

Feed him to Obama and be done with it.

https://www.politico.com/gallery/7-dogs-that-obama-ate?slide=0

It's time to put him down. Probably his dog, too.

This now the second biting dog for the bidens?

If so, believe the first bitin dog was sent off to another family member or "friend.".

Would not be surprised that first dog was put down or "disappeared."

Would also not be surprised the latest biter is not allowed near joey b and the good doctor jill. Why: because the dog doesn't recognize them... they're strangers.

Bidens = failed pet owners. Failed parents to good ol' Hunter.

The next one that gets bit, will be the 12th.

Get that person to a game and let them join the 12th Man.

Kozmozag said:

---

What is the law in DC?

---

An Overview of Dog Bite Laws in Washington, D.C.
There are two statutes in the District of Columbia that eliminate the requirement of scienter in a specific set of circumstances, such as where the dog that attacked a person was at large due to owner negligence. The two statutes can be found under sections 8-1808 and 1-1812.

Aside from those sections, a victim is required to prove an intentional tort, scienter, or negligence. Washington, D.C. falls within a contributory negligence state, which means that a negligent victim is barred from attempting to recover compensation for a dog bite. The Washington, D.C. dog bite lawyers at Ashcraft & Gerel can discuss the statutes of dog bite law with you and help you determine if you have a case.

Dog Bite Statutes
Under section 8-1801(a)(1)(a), the term "at large" is defined as any animal found off its owner's premises that is neither leashed or under the immediate control of a capable person who can restrain it. Section 8-1808 sets out that no dog owner will allow their animal to go at large, and section 8-1812 states that if a dog injures someone while it is at large, the fact that the owner lacks knowledge of the dog's vicious tendencies will not absolve him or her from a finding of negligence.
In D.C., it is held that if a dog bites a person while it is at large, the violation of section 8-1808 is not negligenceper se, but rather only evidence of the negligence. In the example ofChadbourne v. Kappaz, the court approved the trial court's instruction to the jury.

The instruction was that an owner allows his or her animals to go at large if:

• He or she intentionally allows the animal to do so
• Fails to exercise due care in keeping the animal from going at large

In terms of determining the care required, the jury was instructed to consider the dog's propensities that are known to the owner.

Therefore, Washington, D.C.'s statutes create one exception to the one-bite rule: A victim does not have to prove scienter if he or she is bitten by a dog at large as a result of the owner's negligence.

The One-Bite Rule

If you were bitten by a dog in Washington, D.C., you can file a lawsuit against the dog's owner regardless of whether the dog was at large at the time of the incident. You can do so under the one-bite rule. If the dog has bitten someone before, it is expected that the owner should know about the dog's aggressive tendencies and take extra steps to prevent another bite or attack.
A victim can prove a dog's vicious tendencies by showing that the dog is classified as potentially dangerous. The owners of these breeds are obligated to meet a higher standard for restraining their dogs and preventing attacks. Failing to do so could lead to criminal charges.

The Great Danny White.

Can you blame his dog after dealing with this everyday?

Maybe it is a call for help?

Of course the Bidens would own a Hellhound

Learned from his owner.

Sea Speed said:

---

At bite number 2, basically any regular persons dog would be put down by now. This ole boy took it to 11.

---

Living his best life now. Carrying out all his wolf fantasies while living in a mansion with free food and health care. Like being a great white shark in the dolphin tank at Sea World.

LoudestWHOOP! said:

---

Can you blame his dog after dealing with this everyday?

Maybe it is a call for help?

---

Have you ever wondered why dogs roll over on their back?

Maybe it is to make it easier for you to sniff them.

He is a good Democrat, biting the hand that feeds you. The dog has been trained well.

Even the dog is a worthless piece of ****, just like the rest of them. This family is one giant canker sore.

Sounds like retaliation is in order!

The dog is still better behaved than Hunter.

"Commander is not presently on the White House campus while next steps are evaluated," Elizabeth Alexander said.

Biden’s dog Commander booted from White House as staff sound alarm over more attacks: ‘We have to speak up’ https://t.co/q0mZ2V1Vr4 pic.twitter.com/qfca1gqMEU

— New York Post (@nypost) October 5, 2023

President Joe Biden's German Shepherd Commander is seen biting White House staffer, days before it bit Secret Service agent

Well we all knew Biden was incapable making a decision here. Dammit libs. If you can't trust him with his F-ing dog, how in the world do you trust him with ANYTHING IMPORTANT?!?!?

Poor Dinky is goner!