2024 Presidential Candidate Primary Polls

2,175 Views | 23 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by infinity ag
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Republican



Vivek has just moved into above 8% and DeSantis has gone below 15%. Trump is still over 50%. No one else matters.


Democrat


The list is so boring.

Source: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-r/2024/national/
It Aint Easy Being Brown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem with polls is they come from so many different sources, and it depends on who they're targeting as they're voters. I don't really trust any of them. But if they're out there, I guess we have to pay them some heed.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.
Picard
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Polls are like the weather forecast. Whatever they predict is exactly what won't happen.

Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
64.8% of Democrats don't have good enough judgement to deserve a vote.
XXXVII
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTKAG97 said:

If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.


Which is true.
DeSantis 2024

FJB, FJB, FJB, etc
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even if you had a good poll of Iowa it might not matter because it is a caucus

if trump crushes DeSantis in Iowa (which seems likely) The race is over Trump is the nominee

Maybe DeSantis ground game is outstanding and the Iowa Caucus goers back DeSantis and there is a race. It is getting late if anybody is going to slow down Trump
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTKAG97 said:

If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.
You don't say.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

The problem with polls is they come from so many different sources, and it depends on who they're targeting as they're voters. I don't really trust any of them. But if they're out there, I guess we have to pay them some heed.

True, but polls still will directionally give a sense of how much support each candidate has relatively.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTKAG97 said:

If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.

Do you hate math?
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
infinity ag said:

BTKAG97 said:

If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.

Do you hate math?
No I hate idiotic timing. Like calling a game 3 minutes into the first quarter. Your math is bad math because it fails to consider key variables, such as timing.

So, yes, your math is irrelevant and therefor sucks.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

The problem with polls is they come from so many different sources, and it depends on who they're targeting as they're voters. I don't really trust any of them. But if they're out there, I guess we have to pay them some heed.
The real problem is that elections can now be manipulated to reflect the polls.....
Ag CPA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The election is over a year away, what do you mean that "no one else matters"?

Remember who was leading (and who wasn't) around this time in 2015?
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ttu_85 said:

infinity ag said:

BTKAG97 said:

If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.

Do you hate math?
No I hate idiotic timing. Like calling a game 3 minutes into the first quarter. Your math is bad math because it fails to consider key variables, such as timing.

So, yes, your math is irrelevant and therefor sucks.

Why so grumpy just because your man is losing?
GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How the hell is Pence at more than half a percent? Incredible
TheBonifaceOption
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTKAG97 said:

If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.

Or that you are backing a dead horse.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTKAG97 said:

If you believe these polls are accurate, the only thing they show is that the American electorate is dumber than a box of dirt.


NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will Hurd is about to make his move.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vivek moving from 8 to 9.
After today's debate, I see him getting to about 15.

ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm still not buying these polls. Unless Republicans are much more stupid than I thought they were. This is a big scam. We're being setup to believe Trump is inevitable.
milner79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NoahAg said:

Will Hurd is about to make his move.

to California, we can hope?
Sgt. Schultz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem is there is good likelihood that some battleground states with Dem legislatures or AGs will try to find some reason to keep Trump off the ballot by saying he is disqualified. The Dems are coordinated with indictments and legal filings. They are betting there won't be enough time for Trump to counter. I know its unconstitutional but unless SCOTUS steps in immediately, the election will be over by the time it works its way through the courts and the Dems will say "aww shucks."
I know nothing!
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vivek about to cross into 10%. This score is pre-debate.
DeSantis is hanging on to 15%.

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.