Just saw Sound of Freedom

2,417 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by ashleyschaeffer
Showertime at the Bidens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Best movie I've seen in a long time. Not just the subject of the film but I thought it was really well produced. We were on the edge of our seat the entire film. The soundtrack was beautiful.

Anyway, I hope more movies are made like this, And I don't care if I never see another hollywood movie again. It's also interesting How silent the left is on this subject matter.


Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LONG slap fight on feet on entertainment about this movie.

Long story short, the main actor has some off screen kookyness and that's just enough excuse for some to lame the whole thing as Q-Anon conspiracy theories.

No mention, no hints, no references, or innuendo to any of that in the film.

21st Century Fox produced it but then dropped it. Angel picked it up and marketed it as they were able in the best way they could. From there, with limited release it has done very well.

But others use that as just the excuse again to decry right wing propaganda. This giving them cover, in their minds, to ignore or ridicule the film.

All ignoring that that's no basis for the claims and human trafficking remains a massive global issue.
CardiffGiant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed. Saw it a few weeks ago with the wife on date night. I cannot understand why normal sane person would be against this film. Oh wait. Normal and sane are not adjectives that describe the left. Never mind. I get it now.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My wife and I saw it last weekend. Great movie, outstanding acting, wide range of emotions from heartbreaking to heartwarming.
Highly recommend.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kenneth_2003 said:

LONG slap fight on feet on entertainment about this movie.

Long story short, the main actor has some off screen kookyness and that's just enough excuse for some to lame the whole thing as Q-Anon conspiracy theories.

No mention, no hints, no references, or innuendo to any of that in the film.

21st Century Fox produced it but then dropped it. Angel picked it up and marketed it as they were able in the best way they could. From there, with limited release it has done very well.

But others use that as just the excuse again to decry right wing propaganda. This giving them cover, in their minds, to ignore or ridicule the film.

All ignoring that that's no basis for the claims and human trafficking remains a massive global issue.
21st Century Fox didn't drop it; Disney did after they acquired it from Fox. Just to correct the record.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kenneth_2003 said:

LONG slap fight on feet on entertainment about this movie.

Long story short, the main actor has some off screen kookyness and that's just enough excuse for some to lame the whole thing as Q-Anon conspiracy theories.

No mention, no hints, no references, or innuendo to any of that in the film.

21st Century Fox produced it but then dropped it. Angel picked it up and marketed it as they were able in the best way they could. From there, with limited release it has done very well.

But others use that as just the excuse again to decry right wing propaganda. This giving them cover, in their minds, to ignore or ridicule the film.

All ignoring that that's no basis for the claims and human trafficking remains a massive global issue.
Keep in mind it was "Produced" in 2018, but the whole menagerie of 21st CF and Disney didn't want to release it for distribution...

It was Angel Studios that recently bought the rights to it, and released it for distribution.

The question to ask is...

WHY??



B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone who thinks that film is "right wing propaganda" should spend some time with a CBP/ICE agent.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Showertime at the Bidens
How long do you want to ignore this user?

We were going to see Oppenheimer but then noticed in the parental reviews there are several scenes with t&a. I just got frustrated that Hollywood can't produce a movie about the Manhattan project without inserting something indecent and inappropriate.

I don't care if I never see another hollywood made movie. Hopefully, more movies are produced like this.
ashleyschaeffer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
$163 million gross against a $14.5 million budget might be a decent reason.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ashleyschaeffer said:

$163 million gross against a $14.5 million budget might be a decent reason.
Actually, the "WHY" is about 21st CF and Disney not wanting to release it like 4-5 years ago...

Gross, production budget doesn't matter...that is for comparison after release for distribution...

Neither Disney, nor 21st Century Fox wanted their brand to be associated with such a topic or story.

Go figure...
IndividualFreedom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Taking the family on Sat. Trafficking kids to democrats and democrat types really boils my blood. I will bet there is a moment where I scream out, "Squeeze the trigger!!!!".
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zarathustra said:


We were going to see Oppenheimer but then noticed in the parental reviews there are several scenes with t&a. I just got frustrated that Hollywood can't produce a movie about the Manhattan project without inserting something indecent and inappropriate.

I don't care if I never see another hollywood made movie. Hopefully, more movies are produced like this.

They did, its the 1989 Paul Newman film Fatman and Little Boy.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

Kenneth_2003 said:

LONG slap fight on feet on entertainment about this movie.

Long story short, the main actor has some off screen kookyness and that's just enough excuse for some to lame the whole thing as Q-Anon conspiracy theories.

No mention, no hints, no references, or innuendo to any of that in the film.

21st Century Fox produced it but then dropped it. Angel picked it up and marketed it as they were able in the best way they could. From there, with limited release it has done very well.

But others use that as just the excuse again to decry right wing propaganda. This giving them cover, in their minds, to ignore or ridicule the film.

All ignoring that that's no basis for the claims and human trafficking remains a massive global issue.
21st Century Fox didn't drop it; Disney did after they acquired it from Fox. Just to correct the record.


Appreciate the clarification!
LoudestWHOOP!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kenneth_2003 said:

American Hardwood said:

Kenneth_2003 said:

LONG slap fight on feet on entertainment about this movie.

Long story short, the main actor has some off screen kookyness and that's just enough excuse for some to lame the whole thing as Q-Anon conspiracy theories.

No mention, no hints, no references, or innuendo to any of that in the film.

21st Century Fox produced it but then dropped it. Angel picked it up and marketed it as they were able in the best way they could. From there, with limited release it has done very well.

But others use that as just the excuse again to decry right wing propaganda. This giving them cover, in their minds, to ignore or ridicule the film.

All ignoring that that's no basis for the claims and human trafficking remains a massive global issue.
21st Century Fox didn't drop it; Disney did after they acquired it from Fox. Just to correct the record.


Appreciate the clarification!

Back in the Disney Vault
ashleyschaeffer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm with a ya, I misread your previous note.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.