There is a recent trend of women to whine and moan about something or other all the time. The more you give them what they ask for, the more they complain.
This is the latest issue they are beaching about.
If you let the sit on their couches eating bon-bons all day while sending them a sizable paycheck every 2 weeks, they will still complain that their checks aren't weekly.
Motherhood Shouldn't Stifle Women's Income
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-07-11/motherhood-shouldn-t-stifle-women-s-income
By Sarah Green Carmichael
July 11, 2023 at 7:30 AM EDT
This is the latest issue they are beaching about.
If you let the sit on their couches eating bon-bons all day while sending them a sizable paycheck every 2 weeks, they will still complain that their checks aren't weekly.
Motherhood Shouldn't Stifle Women's Income
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-07-11/motherhood-shouldn-t-stifle-women-s-income
By Sarah Green Carmichael
July 11, 2023 at 7:30 AM EDT
Quote:
American mothers typically earn less than childless women, while fathers earn just as much as childless men. The "motherhood penalty" has been documented for years, and it's the primary reason for the overall gender gap in earnings between men and women. But a just-published study throws open new questions about why it exists and why it's been so hard to eradicate.
The earnings discrepancy creates a problem for moms and their families. Children put extra financial pressure on a household, and the motherhood penalty makes it harder for women to help their families meet those needs. Moreover, the hit to earnings leaves women vulnerable should their partner's income disappear.
Quote:
Previous research has suggested that mothers might earn less because they switch to smaller or lower-paying firms that offer more flexible schedules. Other scholars have suggested that households are making a rational decision to prioritize the higher-earning partner's career and that in opposite-sex partnerships, the higher-earning parent tends to be the father.
But the new study, by economists Douglas Almond and Yi Cheng of Columbia University and Cecilia Machado of Brazil's FGV EPGE School of Economics and Finance, suggests that's not what's happening.
Drawn from two decades of data from 1990 through 2010 for more than 800,000 parents, the study first confirms what so much other research has shown: The birth of a first child doesn't meaningfully affect men's earnings but leads to a substantial drop in women's earnings. On average, mothers lose about $2,000 a quarter $8,000 a year. That amounts to a relative drop of about 51% compared with their pre-child earnings.
That drop doesn't meaningfully change at big versus small companies; in other words, women aren't switching to smaller or more flexible firms. Nor are couples making a calculated choice to maximize the household's earning potential because, the researchers conclude, the motherhood penalty persists in households where the woman earns more. In fact, in households with bread winning moms, the penalty is even larger. These women experience a drop of 60% in their pre-child earnings relative to their lower-earning male partner.

